Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
Perhaps you'll go for the silver version at $1,350.00 for 3.3uF - you'd need two per board so 4 for the stero pair = $5400, which is £2900.
£722 per cap
rowemeister said:
Ill have ten LOL
Brent
Perhaps you'll go for the silver version at $1,350.00 for 3.3uF - you'd need two per board so 4 for the stero pair = $5400, which is £2900.
£722 per cap

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
Could you imagine which cdplayer you could buy for the price of a few caps?
allan
SimontY said:
Perhaps you'll go for the silver version at $1,350.00 for 3.3uF - you'd need two per board so 4 for the stero pair = $5400, which is £2900.
£722 per cap![]()
Could you imagine which cdplayer you could buy for the price of a few caps?
allan
Re: Coupling Caps
A capacitor /condenser diminishes reproduction because of losses inherent to construction and used materials. These negative properties are a function of the size and art of the plates, the dielectricum, chemicals and winding technique used.
Despite the good effort the writer gives a report for his loudspeakers only. Practice in speakerbuilding is to compensate one weakness with another. Not so for coupling amplifier stages, where the least loss is preferable.
In case one is ordering at Farnell, take a look at the Revox Rifa SMR series. In 63V there are 2.2 and 3.3uF metallised Polyphenylene Sulphide (PPS) caps with very low loss. These are not too expensive (3 - 4 euro) and what's the need for golden pins?.
Regards, Jaap
PS I used these for the HF filter but they measured quite diverse, so matching a few from a large stock was necessary. I don't think a 2-3% mismatch in the larger value will be of importance.
pantera6 said:I found this link that talks about coupling caps and how they sound.... may be of interest to anyone considering building Ray's FET output stage:
http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Cap.html
Champi
A capacitor /condenser diminishes reproduction because of losses inherent to construction and used materials. These negative properties are a function of the size and art of the plates, the dielectricum, chemicals and winding technique used.
Despite the good effort the writer gives a report for his loudspeakers only. Practice in speakerbuilding is to compensate one weakness with another. Not so for coupling amplifier stages, where the least loss is preferable.
In case one is ordering at Farnell, take a look at the Revox Rifa SMR series. In 63V there are 2.2 and 3.3uF metallised Polyphenylene Sulphide (PPS) caps with very low loss. These are not too expensive (3 - 4 euro) and what's the need for golden pins?.
Regards, Jaap
PS I used these for the HF filter but they measured quite diverse, so matching a few from a large stock was necessary. I don't think a 2-3% mismatch in the larger value will be of importance.
Re: Re: Coupling Caps
To 'BLING' them up LOL
Brent
disco said:
A capacitor /condenser diminishes reproduction because of losses inherent to construction and used materials. These negative properties are a function of the size and art of the plates, the dielectricum, chemicals and winding technique used.
Despite the good effort the writer gives a report for his loudspeakers only. Practice in speakerbuilding is to compensate one weakness with another. Not so for coupling amplifier stages, where the least loss is preferable.
In case one is ordering at Farnell, take a look at the Revox Rifa SMR series. In 63V there are 2.2 and 3.3uF metallised Polyphenylene Sulphide (PPS) caps with very low loss. These are not too expensive (3 - 4 euro) and what's the need for golden pins?.
Regards, Jaap
To 'BLING' them up LOL
Brent
Re: Re: Coupling Caps
best capacitor for coupling is no cap.
or in speakers active crossovers
allan
ps well thats just my opinion
pps
Jaap are the fet's and transistors pin compatible?
disco said:
A capacitor /condenser diminishes reproduction because of losses inherent to construction and used materials. These negative properties are a function of the size and art of the plates, the dielectricum, chemicals and winding technique used.
Despite the good effort the writer gives a report for his loudspeakers only. Practice in speakerbuilding is to compensate one weakness with another. Not so for coupling amplifier stages, where the least loss is preferable.
In case one is ordering at Farnell, take a look at the Revox Rifa SMR series. In 63V there are 2.2 and 3.3uF metallised Polyphenylene Sulphide (PPS) caps with very low loss. These are not too expensive (3 - 4 euro) and what's the need for golden pins?.
Regards, Jaap
best capacitor for coupling is no cap.
or in speakers active crossovers
allan
ps well thats just my opinion
pps
Jaap are the fet's and transistors pin compatible?
Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
I fully agree to that statement. DC-coupling !
Yes Allan, they are pincompatible.
awpagan said:best capacitor for coupling is no cap.
or in speakers active crossovers
allan
ps well thats just my opinion
pps
Jaap are the fet's and transistors pin compatible?
I fully agree to that statement. DC-coupling !
Yes Allan, they are pincompatible.
Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
Marketing!
But.... how about my little problem reading discs?
Something to do with zero tracking?
Regards, Jaap
rowemeister said:To 'BLING' them up LOL
Brent
Marketing!
But.... how about my little problem reading discs?

Something to do with zero tracking?
Regards, Jaap
Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
thanks Jaap
now i'll see if i can find some 2sk170's locally
or the LSK170's might be easier.
allan
disco said:
I fully agree to that statement. DC-coupling !
Yes Allan, they are pincompatible.
thanks Jaap
now i'll see if i can find some 2sk170's locally
or the LSK170's might be easier.
allan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
You can order them matched at Vacuum State in Australia. They are used @ 4mA, right Ray?
Jaap
awpagan said:thanks Jaap
now i'll see if i can find some 2sk170's locally
or the LSK170's might be easier.
allan
You can order them matched at Vacuum State in Australia. They are used @ 4mA, right Ray?
Jaap
I have just tapped my discrete pcb onto my mates KI running opa2134 and compared sound here at work.
Considering the pcb was running on bodged up 12v regs and lots of flying leads and on a crap nad amp and mission / mordaunt short hybrid speakers here the sound was more open and the bass was tighter.
Vocals were much clearer indeed.
If i can hear that now then the gains at home are going to be much much more. Ill fit pcb when my Fets arrive.
PS Can I not stick with these 3.3uF caps. I have the feeling the 6uF are going to be too big.
Brent
Considering the pcb was running on bodged up 12v regs and lots of flying leads and on a crap nad amp and mission / mordaunt short hybrid speakers here the sound was more open and the bass was tighter.
Vocals were much clearer indeed.
If i can hear that now then the gains at home are going to be much much more. Ill fit pcb when my Fets arrive.
PS Can I not stick with these 3.3uF caps. I have the feeling the 6uF are going to be too big.
Brent
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
No, only 1mA. The current sink is supposed to be at 2mA.
Regards,
Ray.
disco said:You can order them matched at Vacuum State in Australia. They are used @ 4mA, right Ray?
Jaap
No, only 1mA. The current sink is supposed to be at 2mA.
Regards,
Ray.
rowemeister said:I have just tapped my discrete pcb onto my mates KI running opa2134 and compared sound here at work.
Considering the pcb was running on bodged up 12v regs and lots of flying leads and on a crap nad amp and mission / mordaunt short hybrid speakers here the sound was more open and the bass was tighter.
Vocals were much clearer indeed.
If i can hear that now then the gains at home are going to be much much more. Ill fit pcb when my Fets arrive.
PS Can I not stick with these 3.3uF caps. I have the feeling the 6uF are going to be too big.
Brent
Nice 😀 ! Guess the LCR caps are pretty ok.
3u3 is fine, as long as the input impedance of the following stage is not too low. 20kR will give you a ~2.4Hz/-3dB point with this cap. Shouldn't be a problem. I really have to replace the caps I use at the moment...
Ray.
Hi guys,
I wanna know, before ask for it, the diffrence between AD8620AR, AD8620ARZ and AD8620BRZ ? Each time many letters...
I'll also order the stuff from Ray's list.
After I'll look for the choice of opamps, clock ( the Flea ? )...
For the OPA627BRG4 , they won't send it to me, delayed...
Update : no way to order from Farnell's, because they said I do not order enough of each... another way ?
Update II : I can order the caps that are numberous on the board... also, Ray what is +100n PPS ? Caps ? And ferrites are used in wich way ?? Thanks !!!
I wanna know, before ask for it, the diffrence between AD8620AR, AD8620ARZ and AD8620BRZ ? Each time many letters...
I'll also order the stuff from Ray's list.
After I'll look for the choice of opamps, clock ( the Flea ? )...
For the OPA627BRG4 , they won't send it to me, delayed...
Update : no way to order from Farnell's, because they said I do not order enough of each... another way ?
Update II : I can order the caps that are numberous on the board... also, Ray what is +100n PPS ? Caps ? And ferrites are used in wich way ?? Thanks !!!
Malefoda said:Hi guys,
I wanna know, before ask for it, the diffrence between AD8620AR, AD8620ARZ and AD8620BRZ ? Each time many letters...
I'll also order the stuff from Ray's list.
After I'll look for the choice of opamps, clock ( the Flea ? )...
For the OPA627BRG4 , they won't send it to me, delayed...
Hi, the 'Z' at the end means the product is lead free. What the difference is between AD8620AR and AD8620BR can be read in the datasheet. In case you can't find it, it's located here
Jaap
PS Do you think it's wise to order these ICs? They are very small and it takes knowledge to solder these on the expensive Brown Dog sockets. Why don't you start modding the player and keep the opamps?
Farnell might not accept orders below 50 euro from private customers ...
Tonight i did the coax mod for Dac pin 4 to decoder.
RD14 was originally 220 in my cd67se, I lowered that one to 68 ohm. placed a 1n capacitor in series.
Also did the sat and slk (dac pin 11 and 12) to the cpu, didn't cut traces yet because I first wanted to listen to what it does. For these two coaxes I used a very thin silver coax wire.
Just listening now
RD14 was originally 220 in my cd67se, I lowered that one to 68 ohm. placed a 1n capacitor in series.
Also did the sat and slk (dac pin 11 and 12) to the cpu, didn't cut traces yet because I first wanted to listen to what it does. For these two coaxes I used a very thin silver coax wire.
Just listening now

disco said:
Hi, the 'Z' at the end means the product is lead free. What the difference is between AD8620AR and AD8620BR can be read in the datasheet. In case you can't find it, it's located here
Jaap
PS Do you think it's wise to order these ICs? They are very small and it takes knowledge to solder these on the expensive Brown Dog sockets. Why don't you start modding the player and keep the opamps?
Farnell might not accept orders below 50 euro from private customers ...
You are right ! I'm a bit stupid... shame on me !
I'll se the opamps later. And for 2 channels ones.
Right now my problem is how to order the caps and such somewhere on the Internet...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
This is good to know - Thanks! So before I go out and spend more on a pair of coupling caps than I bought the CD63 🙁, I've got 2 questions for those of you in the know:
1. Can this FET/Transistor stage be DC Coupled?
2. (Maybe related to 1.) What would be the effect of taking out the high-pass filter (C5 & R12)?
Just trying to understand this circuit better (and learning about basic electronics at the same time) 🙂
Cheers,
Champi
disco said:
A capacitor /condenser diminishes reproduction because of losses inherent to construction and used materials. These negative properties are a function of the size and art of the plates, the dielectricum, chemicals and winding technique used.
Despite the good effort the writer gives a report for his loudspeakers only. Practice in speakerbuilding is to compensate one weakness with another. Not so for coupling amplifier stages, where the least loss is preferable.
In case one is ordering at Farnell, take a look at the Revox Rifa SMR series. In 63V there are 2.2 and 3.3uF metallised Polyphenylene Sulphide (PPS) caps with very low loss. These are not too expensive (3 - 4 euro) and what's the need for golden pins?.
Regards, Jaap
PS I used these for the HF filter but they measured quite diverse, so matching a few from a large stock was necessary. I don't think a 2-3% mismatch in the larger value will be of importance.
disco said:
I fully agree to that statement. DC-coupling !
Yes Allan, they are pincompatible.
This is good to know - Thanks! So before I go out and spend more on a pair of coupling caps than I bought the CD63 🙁, I've got 2 questions for those of you in the know:
1. Can this FET/Transistor stage be DC Coupled?
2. (Maybe related to 1.) What would be the effect of taking out the high-pass filter (C5 & R12)?
Just trying to understand this circuit better (and learning about basic electronics at the same time) 🙂
Cheers,
Champi
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coupling Caps
You don't want to feed your amplifier with DC as it will destroy the loudspeakers (a.o.). The last capacitor leaves out the DC offset presented by the DAC. Another way to couple to your amplifier and get rid of the DC is by replacing the coupling cap by a transformer. Good ones are expensive though.
The HF-filter attenuates unwanted frequencies originating from the digital domain.
Jaap
pantera6 said:This is good to know - Thanks! So before I go out and spend more on a pair of coupling caps than I bought the CD63 🙁, I've got 2 questions for those of you in the know:
1. Can this FET/Transistor stage be DC Coupled?
2. (Maybe related to 1.) What would be the effect of taking out the high-pass filter (C5 & R12)?
Just trying to understand this circuit better (and learning about basic electronics at the same time) 🙂
Cheers,
Champi
You don't want to feed your amplifier with DC as it will destroy the loudspeakers (a.o.). The last capacitor leaves out the DC offset presented by the DAC. Another way to couple to your amplifier and get rid of the DC is by replacing the coupling cap by a transformer. Good ones are expensive though.
The HF-filter attenuates unwanted frequencies originating from the digital domain.
Jaap
6h5c said:
Nice 😀 ! Guess the LCR caps are pretty ok.
3u3 is fine, as long as the input impedance of the following stage is not too low. 20kR will give you a ~2.4Hz/-3dB point with this cap. Shouldn't be a problem. I really have to replace the caps I use at the moment...
Ray.
Ray are you refering to R1 and R2 on your FET diagram. Change from 2.4K to 20K?
Brent
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- Marantz CD63 & CD67 mods list