gy21 said:
No problem
I used 33uF before and after each regulator, which isn't necessarily optimal, it's just what I felt like using.
Additionally there's a 2200uF before all of those, which is there for smoothing for when I feed it voltage from outside the box (future upgrade - toroid, schottky diodes, wire to cdp, wire to reg board).
Si
DAC output filter and supplies
Hi all,
I simulated the DAC output filter using PSpice with 1000p in C605 (original) and 470p (modified). I could see the reduction in group delay amounting to less then 3us, and when I compare it with some articles on the internet about the audiability of group delay at different frequencies being in the range of few miliseconds, I really find the improvement miniscule. It is still the loudspeaker that makes the bulk of the whole group delay and can make it exceed the ms range. On the other hand, about 1dB of gain is lost at 20kHz, maybe this is something we should worry about now???
A question about the same output filter: In the original Double-pole Multiple-feedback active filter topology, there is no inductance, like L601. What it does is, it adds a zero at around 400 kHz and obviously the attenuation of the DAC noise at higher frequencies is much lower than without it. This frequency corresponds well with the DAC sampling frequency, being 44.1 kHz X 8 times oversampling = 352.8 kHz. Do you have any clue why the designers have done it?
There have been much discussions about 5V regulators around the DAC, and I would like to share some of the things I have done. I use a single regulator for the digital section and two 5V regs for each of the analog channels. As you can see on the CD63 schematic, by removing some connections you can supply separate power to each of the audio channels and the ground connections of the right and left analog sections originally go to the star point separatelly - probably to avoid any possible crosstalk. I don't remember now quite well, but there was a chance that by installing a single reg for two channels, when connecting the ground to both of them, a ground loop is created extending to the star point. Therefore I removed the ground connections to the star point by removing some of the jumpers, and replaced them with the ground connections from the reg, taken from the 10V supply taken in a single point. Has anybody else done the same "mass"?
Cheers,
Petar
Hi all,
I simulated the DAC output filter using PSpice with 1000p in C605 (original) and 470p (modified). I could see the reduction in group delay amounting to less then 3us, and when I compare it with some articles on the internet about the audiability of group delay at different frequencies being in the range of few miliseconds, I really find the improvement miniscule. It is still the loudspeaker that makes the bulk of the whole group delay and can make it exceed the ms range. On the other hand, about 1dB of gain is lost at 20kHz, maybe this is something we should worry about now???
A question about the same output filter: In the original Double-pole Multiple-feedback active filter topology, there is no inductance, like L601. What it does is, it adds a zero at around 400 kHz and obviously the attenuation of the DAC noise at higher frequencies is much lower than without it. This frequency corresponds well with the DAC sampling frequency, being 44.1 kHz X 8 times oversampling = 352.8 kHz. Do you have any clue why the designers have done it?
There have been much discussions about 5V regulators around the DAC, and I would like to share some of the things I have done. I use a single regulator for the digital section and two 5V regs for each of the analog channels. As you can see on the CD63 schematic, by removing some connections you can supply separate power to each of the audio channels and the ground connections of the right and left analog sections originally go to the star point separatelly - probably to avoid any possible crosstalk. I don't remember now quite well, but there was a chance that by installing a single reg for two channels, when connecting the ground to both of them, a ground loop is created extending to the star point. Therefore I removed the ground connections to the star point by removing some of the jumpers, and replaced them with the ground connections from the reg, taken from the 10V supply taken in a single point. Has anybody else done the same "mass"?
Cheers,
Petar
SimontY said:
No problem
I used 33uF before and after each regulator, which isn't necessarily optimal, it's just what I felt like using.
Additionally there's a 2200uF before all of those, which is there for smoothing for when I feed it voltage from outside the box (future upgrade - toroid, schottky diodes, wire to cdp, wire to reg board).
Si
One more question
all three inputs for the 7805 can be connected to each other? same for grounds? only the output must be separated from each other.
correct?
Gooch said:
Nope. Fleas from PFM, see http://www.acoustica.org.uk/
And correct, they basically are HQ regulators set for 5V, and Tent labs XO just seems to fit.
Voltage can be changed if used without the XO.
6h5c said:
Hey, nice one avr! Looks good with christmas too!
Ray.
Christmas tree - get out of here. How would you mount these? Next version should be a blade edition connecting to a backplane.