Lateral CFA 120W - BSA

hi Damir, hi thimios,

after 2 days of rest from from discussions and and measuring of the prototype build from thimios, i am interested in the actual state of the Lateral CFA 120 BSA ( my name is Black Superb Amplifier; since the pcb has a black mate soldermask).

My planned DC supply is about +/- 52 V. What are the actual pcb modifications, changes in values, additonal equipped parts, parts not to equip? i followed the discussions in the thread, but i am not sure, which is the actual parts list for thimios working prototype.

Damir, BOM of the class A type misses R0= 10R. Is it possible to reduce the LP R1C2 to a smaller frequency, since the 3db-pint is about 1,5 MHz (C2new at 1nF or 2,2nF?)

BR
Günni
Hi Gunni,
I expect Thimios to tell what was last configuration for +-50V PS and then I will suggest BOM changes, or additional caps if needed.
You can increase LP cap, with 1nF 3dB point is around 1.1MHz and with 2n2 around 360kHz but phase shift at 20kHZ is 3.5 deegre.
Increasing LP resistor will increase input distortion and noise. You know that source output impedance is part of that LP filter.
 
Hi Gunni,
I expect Thimios to tell what was last configuration for +-50V PS and then I will suggest BOM changes, or additional caps if needed.
You can increase LP cap, with 1nF 3dB point is around 1.1MHz and with 2n2 around 360kHz but phase shift at 20kHZ is 3.5 deegre.
Increasing LP resistor will increase input distortion and noise. You know that source output impedance is part of that LP filter.

I will post schematic as built for +/-50v power supply soon.
Regards.
 
Ok here you are.
 

Attachments

  • Damir lateral 120W as built.png
    Damir lateral 120W as built.png
    519.6 KB · Views: 706
Last edited:
Understanding it correct , Q5 and Q6 is designed for 2N5551/2N5401 or BC550/BC560 (turned bei 180°), but not for SA992 and SC1845. Anything against the use of 2N5551/5401 or BC546/BC556 or BC550/BC560 (Class A version). C8 and C11 can be used in the Class A versiin (35V DC) ? i have here 330nF and 470 nF Wima MKP4 or should they remain unequipped? Damir, do you agree to the layout issues i sent before? Which layout program did you use?

BR
Günni
 
Understanding it correct , Q5 and Q6 is designed for 2N5551/2N5401 or BC550/BC560 (turned bei 180°), but not for SA992 and SC1845. Anything against the use of 2N5551/5401 or BC546/BC556 or BC550/BC560 (Class A version). C8 and C11 can be used in the Class A versiin (35V DC) ? i have here 330nF and 470 nF Wima MKP4 or should they remain unequipped? Damir, do you agree to the layout issues i sent before? Which layout program did you use?

BR
Günni

Nothing against 5551,5401 just i have change those because i can't trust the UTC label especially when looking for the source of oscillation.
It seems that C8,C11 not affect the stability at +/35v
 
Last edited:
I hope everyone understand that the 1uF emitter load bypass is what makes Dadod's amp unique and interesting. Without it, I can't see any possibility this will sound as good as my simpler CFA. Could you please try higher capacitance instead of lower? No more than 3.3uF may be?

Hi Johnego,

From my perspective, this is the wrong assumption.
Emitter load bypass you mention above is very frequency-dependent, becoming a bypass at rather high frequencies. In the worst case, it may influence the loop characteristics somewhere above 10KHz.

Damir's amplifier has got a good ("short") harmonics profile (mainly harmonics 2, 3), so whatever part of the bandwidth we take, there will be no big difference in the spectrums with or without those capacitors in the frequency range we are able to hear.

Those caps definitely influence stability margins, however, depending on a particular design, they can either increase or decrease them. One of my designs becomes stable as soon as they are in place (small value, 150-220pF). Most of the other designs - become unstable.

I have never experienced any influence on the sound quality from these caps though.

Cheers,
Valery
 
Those caps definitely influence stability margins, however, depending on a particular design, they can either increase or decrease them. One of my designs becomes stable as soon as they are in place (small value, 150-220pF). Most of the other designs - become unstable.

That's why I mentioned that these caps were problematic. I actually meant to say to remove it. Simulation is not accurate so for this kind of 'compensation' where 'bigger not always better' we have to be careful (and always start without the cap). I used this technique but never for stability compensation. My similar amp has better thd performance but stable with ONLY one cap across FB. Never found such RC technique necessary for stability.

In this amp I guess Dadod wanted a 'wideband' open loop performance so he used those caps. I'm curious myself if it can add something to the sound. If the purpose is only THD20K, I can achieve better without it.

But the thd spectrum on page one is interesting. Mine is not like that and I'm curious to find out what has shaped that hd spectrum. I'm sure it is any of the small/compensation caps. Do you know?
 
Soon ready for test

Both versions of the Lateral CFA 120W BSA (Black Superb Amplifier) are soon ready for test. Some capacitors , resistors and the coils still missing and ordered already. i am really excited, how they will sound both.


If someone is interested in remaining empty PCBs, PM me. Due to high shipping costs, only european users will be preferred

Günni
 

Attachments

  • PICT0457.JPG
    PICT0457.JPG
    728.2 KB · Views: 610
  • PICT0458.JPG
    PICT0458.JPG
    753.4 KB · Views: 601