• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

KT88 PP - Dotting the Is, crossing the Ts

Chris Hornbeck,

The CCS impedance needs to be compared to:
(1/Gm + ((1 + u) x Plate load Z)); Where the plate load Z, is the parallel of: plate resistor, RL and the next stage's grid resistor, Rg.

That simply means the cathode impedance is larger than 1/GM (sometimes much larger).
It works in the favor of the CCS being 'more effective' in that circuit.

I love your posts!
 
Curse all of the myriad of simulations, I built this one in 2001 as an experimental Circlotron.
And tried three different OPT systems.👍

This project was originally published in the Volume 33, Issue 5 of AudioXpress magazine in May of 2002. It describes a high fidelity vacuum tube amplifier based the Circlotron from the 1950s. The circuit appears to be somewhat involved, but a closer look will reveal all. The primary object is to show what is possible with off the shelf parts & at reasonable cost.

The D% results, with & without NFB speak for themselves. And without the multiple delays as simulations get in the way.
The AC balance Pot is a Mil Spec thing that is able to handle the 2nd Diff Amp plate current.🙂
 

Attachments

  • Circlotron3.jpg
    Circlotron3.jpg
    111.8 KB · Views: 86
  • CirclotronPS.jpg
    CirclotronPS.jpg
    110.5 KB · Views: 86
  • CirclotronA 6.jpg
    CirclotronA 6.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 77
  • Table One.jpg
    Table One.jpg
    213.4 KB · Views: 72
  • Table Two.jpg
    Table Two.jpg
    182.8 KB · Views: 82
  • Like
Reactions: 6A3sUMMER
Baudouin0,

Thanks for the feedback! (Post # 245)

In my next amplifier that I use a CCS, I will try with, and without, the cathode resistors that go to the CCS (and with no resistors).

I may have to use a battery as a simple way to get a negative supply for the CCS. Usually my CCS are at ground at one end.
I barely have enough cathode bias voltage (and the cathode's negative swing with signal) to keep the CCS within its minimum burden voltage limit.
No simulation necessary, mother nature will give me the answers.

Once I do that test, I bet I take the battery out, and take the cathode resistors out, and go back to a grounded end of the CCS.
 
Last edited:
OK for me the output power is a little low for the HT. Could be screen resistors 220R or could be the driver output hitting the HT rail or the OPT ratio. May not matter. I have 2 pairs of 6550A operation (UL) on 430V HT and this gives 120W rms so 60W per pair @ 430V. So 1 pair of KT88 at 520V maybe 70-80W. It may not matter to you but just check nothing is amiss. You maybe hitting saturation on the driver plates with 33k + 100k and the plate voltage. You may need to increase the CCS a little to lower the plate voltage.
 
Last edited:
OK. I think your running the LTP cold. The result of this is I think is that the non linearity in the LTP stage and the non linearity approaching 0V on the grid of the KT88 start to cancel. This could of course be total rubbish. The danger is you may not drive the KT88 grid quite fully. The advantage is you won't get blocking.
 
OK but I would aim to drive the KT88's fully. If the LPT is running out of current then you will get different results depending on the KT88 fitted, your bias and the HT voltage. In my books the design needs to be toleranced even it that means sacrificing some THD. Measuring the grid voltage on the scope of the KT88 will indicate if you have headroom or not.