Goodmorning Pavel
Please tell😉
To me it seems quite normal, if you make a connection between C of TR8 to B of TR10, and again from C of TR7 to B of TR11.....
Or did I miss omething ???? 😕
Please tell😉
To me it seems quite normal, if you make a connection between C of TR8 to B of TR10, and again from C of TR7 to B of TR11.....
Or did I miss omething ???? 😕
Pic of a "normal" biasing circuit...
Sorry but it has to wait, as it seems as the pics I got here at my labtop doesn´t show well when published here...
Sorry but it has to wait, as it seems as the pics I got here at my labtop doesn´t show well when published here...

To Jan : P.S. : If you will make a PCB, give capacitors on position CB of drivers and serial resistors to the basis of output devices - amp will be more stable 😉 .
P.P.S.: Try to think to give there a protector for overcurrent ( same as you have in your amp ) - amp without this circuit is crime 😎 .
Pavel
Thanks for your suggestions 😉
I will sure put in the output protection circuit, base resistors and CB caps on the drivers🙂
Thanks for your suggestions 😉
I will sure put in the output protection circuit, base resistors and CB caps on the drivers🙂
It was a "smart trick"
it hides the basic sound quality of the incredeble poor schematics......its called "floating ground"
Musical Fidelity used "floating ground" as well for there P270 and A370
Removed my comments on Krell engineering or lack of same 🙄
Should not spoile your fun 😉
it hides the basic sound quality of the incredeble poor schematics......its called "floating ground"

Musical Fidelity used "floating ground" as well for there P270 and A370
Removed my comments on Krell engineering or lack of same 🙄
Should not spoile your fun 😉
Hi all,
I have now drawn the KSA-50 mk.II schematic in my CAD software: http://www.delta-audio.com/temp_acd/Krell-Clone_KSA-50.pdf
Please let me know your comments before I start the PCB-layout 😉
To PMik:
I agree, however we do diy for fun 😉
I have now drawn the KSA-50 mk.II schematic in my CAD software: http://www.delta-audio.com/temp_acd/Krell-Clone_KSA-50.pdf
Please let me know your comments before I start the PCB-layout 😉
To PMik:
I agree, however we do diy for fun 😉
Can anybody comment on how much it'll cost to built this clone - using non-exotic parts and excluding chassis cost.
Yes, there is an obvious (symetrical) error on schematic that I gave link to. Base of TR10 should be connected with collector of TR8. As T11 with TR7. Thats, it. Waiting for suggestions on low power transistor replacements. Thanks all for contributing.
Regards,
Zoran
Regards,
Zoran
Pavel
You are absolutely right 😉
Please comment other errors, as I was drawing this schematic last night 😴
You are absolutely right 😉
Please comment other errors, as I was drawing this schematic last night 😴
Jan, it must to stay Krell, not to be DuDu ( Dupont - Dudek ) 😀 , so only little notices : Q 105 - MPSA 92, Q 106 - MPSA 42 - Pc in this position is not big, so there is 0,5 W Pc enough ( MPSA .. or MPSW .. family ). Q 111 - give there some transistor in TO 126 ML ( full insulated - easy mounting ), such as 2 SC 3955 or similar. C 109 - give bigger value ( cca M1 - 1 M / 63 V). Current sense ( R 301, 302 ) is better to lead from both emiters of power devices ( value 4*200 R ). Give on rails blocking capacity ( + to G, - to G and + to - ). Other improvement are not required, 'cos Daniel d' Agostino is boss 😎 .
Pavel
Your suggestions sounds ok to me 😉
And as you say, we must take care that we don't move the "project" too far away from original Krell (otherwise we could just make a new ourself a new amp) 😉 The "DU-DU Amp" 😀
Your suggestions sounds ok to me 😉
And as you say, we must take care that we don't move the "project" too far away from original Krell (otherwise we could just make a new ourself a new amp) 😉 The "DU-DU Amp" 😀
zcolic2
Sorry for this late comment to your input....
If you look at the schematic I have uploaded, you see that this error in the schematic provided by you has been corrected😉
Sorry for this late comment to your input....
If you look at the schematic I have uploaded, you see that this error in the schematic provided by you has been corrected😉
Pavel
By the way.............
Which Pc's do you suggest instead of MPSA 42 and MPSA 92 ???
😉
I think it's possible to choose between a lot of different Pc's with the same pin configuration as the 42/92's 😉 So the printed name in the schematic doesn't matter 🙂
By the way.............
Which Pc's do you suggest instead of MPSA 42 and MPSA 92 ???
😉
I think it's possible to choose between a lot of different Pc's with the same pin configuration as the 42/92's 😉 So the printed name in the schematic doesn't matter 🙂
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Krell KSA 50 PCB