Preconditions before you're willing to fullfill your obligation? 😉
But anyway, yes, your words in there...and now for the evidence.....
I think he even does not understand the terms used, their meaning. It is difficult, then, to continue in any kind of discussion with him, as it is reverted to expressions like
not understanding that "dynamic nature of the music signals" is in fact a trivial stress and that a step change covers all the behavior of the tested regulator - just an understanding of control theory is needed, which can be hardly substituted by listening experience 😀
Have you ever argued against those with commercial interest? I find them to be the most persistent ones. After all, money is a big motivator.
You didn't and still haven't quoted my words like I quoted yours. Accusation
Not you, him 🙂 Not saying you don't of course 😉You got me.I admit. The question is, will they?
What I suggested was that stability of power was paramount for devices where a reference voltage or ground is essential. This is particularly evident in digital audio devices.
I premised that something in these devices seem to interact with the output stages of active regulators under conditions of dynamic current requirements & this seems not to be the case when passive devices, batteries or supercaps are delivering the current. Voltage regulators between batteries/supercaps & device being powered is detrimental to the sound would seem to be evidence of this.
Plots posted so far doesn't address this.
See my post above regarding reguators
Never met Ponty, but, yes, I feel the same. And, Lord, I prefer the music of Didier and his ... how to say ... dedication and modesty ?
Stop bending the truth.
I've quoted your post before when asking the first time for the evidence for your claims.
Now you did ask if it were your words and I answered as requested, so bring up what you've promised, it's just that simple.
You "premised" with no evidence and no understanding of how any of the devices involve behave.
When I am clueless about a topic I try not to propose hypotheses and I read and learn.
Are you for real? Have you read through the requirements? Do you have any idea what it means to go through admission and yearly exams? In particular for somebody that by self admission abandoned school at 17, before graduating High School?
Aerospace Engineering | UCLA Graduate Programs
Anyway, I will not further discuss this topic with somebody that hasn't ever seen a doctoral school from the inside. Alfred Jarry would be happy to take notes of such a discussion.
Tell you why, because I smell a scoundrel, of the kind is over populating this topic.
Last edited:
The evidence is my observations of having done such experiments & I read others on here who have done similar . I take it you never have & have no curiosity to do so.
As always, the arrogant self- regarding cognoscenti bask in their feelings of superiority & yet remain ignorant
I wonder why batteries are still used in instrumentation where sensitivity & stability of the measurements is paramount even when such stellar low noise voltage regulators are available.
I wondered how old y’all were....theres a bitterness that could only come with those numbers (loss of eyesight,hearing,motor skills and what not) I’m 54 and see these things catching me in the rear view......I do appreciate the insight to the future.😛
I am for real. I have read the requirements. I have gone through admission. We didn't have yearly exams (other than course exams in each course). Only the 3 PhD exams I mentioned. Are you saying you went somewhere with different requirements... shocking!
Who else were you discussing this with? Even though you are willing to further discuss with me, I'm unwilling to further discuss this with someone so pretentious and ignorant.
Hearing still holds to 13-14kHz, not too bad re my age. Eyes ok, mobility as well (going to Alps soon), however some coronary issues 😀
It's know as scientific relativism, someone randomly soldering circuits together relying on their "ears" as only test instrument is on equal ground with anyone else. More importantly we have to read 500 pages of literature on proper psycho-acoustic testing and religiously follow the protocol specified to even question their results.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.