FTR, I wasn't suggesting doing 80dB rejection at one octave removed, just that having bandwidth (traditionally defined by -3dB points) much beyond 20kHz can only have bad effects. I get very suspicious when audio designers put out things like amps that are flat to MHz.
Actually these days I am seeing 50,000 hertz bandwidth for the -3 dB point with active filtering. Do-able with current technology and in unpublished ABX tests (Might be published soon though!) shows a difference.
Just after 100KHz, the noise level goes way up out to >500Khz. This is a BlueRay playing video test disk only and the output of one audio channel shown. The player also has an idle freq at 950Khz.
T
That peak looks like those you get from not decoupling voltage references and regulators properly. Just compare the 2 pictures. I think I have published my pic already, but could not find the post.
regards, Gerhard
Attachments
Last edited:
Of course, Richard and Esperado are correct. High frequency 'garbage' has been around virtually forever, and it is not getting better.
Waly, if you don't believe in improving audio quality, why do you bother us here?
For the record, it is difficult to make a low pass filter that will not be ACTIVE and therefore prone to adding distortion. It is simply easier to make audio gain stages that can handle high frequency 'garbage' and rely on a simple RC rolloff above 100KHz to reduce any real RF. It doesn't cost that much more, maybe a slightly faster IC will do it. Even better, a true class A discrete design.
Surely the garbage being talked about is generally common mode and there are plenty of well proven techniques for dealing with that? Or am I missing something?
Yes you've got it! Unfortunately AM radio starts at 540 kilohertz around here and we have 50 kW two miles away. The issue with RC is the series R adds noise and the C often self resonates. (Some power supply electrolytic's actually resonate in the audio band!)
The issue of attenuating just above the audio band effectively requires L & C if you want to do it passively. L comes with serious penalties, either over size air core and large loop area or distortion from a core material. So wider bandwidth in the amplifier and making it an active filter is one way to go.
Bipolar junction transistors as input devices can be a real problem, particularly when current starved.
So a JFET input with a wideband amplifier that has active filtering is one good approach. Of course JFETS are not where the money is for most manufacturers.
So my next project should be a time machine to allow purchasing the best parts that are now no longer made. 🙂
I would try, R,C and lossy ferrite bead for the very HF. No air core inductors. Resonating caps would require some damping resistance.
Ferrites don't saturate at lier level signals and K Ohm resistance loads - they really are fantastic devices. And, like myrtle block cable lifters, they are completely inaudible despite what the Oracle of Boulder aka the Sandman, has to say on the subject.
Just after 100KHz, the noise level goes way up out to >500Khz. This is a BlueRay playing video test disk only and the output of one audio channel shown.
This looks like remains of noise shaping to me.
I just love those lossy ferrites! High hysteresis, maybe some distortion. '-)
I know, drives everyone screaming out of the room with their hands over their ears. Hysterical exaggeration seems to be required in all these listening impressions.
Last edited:
^ I can't even walk into a room with those ferrite beads on DVI/HDMI cables. I can feel them from outside, their lossy magnetic-ness haunting me. 😉
That peak looks like those you get from not decoupling voltage references and regulators properly. Just compare the 2 pictures. I think I have published my pic already, but could not find the post.
regards, Gerhard
That could be a possibility. Or noise shaping, perhaps. But everyone ought to look at what is coming and going above the music signal itself. Esp as the amps can and will try to amplify it. In test reviews, a filter is often at 30KHz (AP). You only get good data that way but not realistic, practical data. Esp as a system of components in a mixed signal (home) environment. A few years ago here I also showed some spectrums of freq put onto the ac power lines due to different products on the ac line... like a computer or lamp dimmer or TV/video monitor, etc. It's Nasty.
THx-RNMarsh
Last edited:
That peak looks like those you get from not decoupling voltage references and regulators properly. Just compare the 2 pictures. I think I have published my pic already, but could not find the post.
regards, Gerhard
That could be a possibility. Or from noise shaping, perhaps. But everyone ought to look at what is coming and going above the music signal itself. Esp as the amps can and will try to amplify it. In test reviews, a filter is often at 30KHz (AP). You only get good comparison data that way but not realistic, practical data. Esp as a system of components in a mixed signal (home) environment. A few years ago here I also showed some spectrum's of freq picked up on the ac power lines due to different products on the ac line... like a computer or lamp dimmer or TV/video monitor, etc. It's Nasty.
THx-RNMarsh
Last edited:
IME ferrites do clean HF junk, BUT they also add a fatiguing and unnatural 'sharpness' to the overall sound.I know, drives everyone screaming out of the room with their hands over their ears. Hysterical exaggeration seems to be required in all these listening impressions.
Dan.
I just love those lossy ferrites! High hysteresis, maybe some distortion. '-)
John,
At audio frequencies and up to 1-2 MHz, lossy ferrite SMD's are almost entirely resistive at very low single digit Ohms. If you are using beads over device leads, the DC and LF resistance contribution is zero. The real work of ferrites is done at 5-10 MHZ and higher.
You will not hear anything at audio other than a significant reduction in HF ( i.e MHz) demodulated garbage on your system. I'd take ferrites over BQP's any day. And at a few pennies, they are a real bargain.
See the Murata website for more details.
Could it be that the HF junk was adding a soothing and unnatural smudginess to the sound, which you miss when it has been removed?Max Headroom said:IME ferrites do clean HF junk, BUT they also add a fatiguing and unnatural 'sharpness' to the overall sound.
Ferrites do, of course, have to be used with care. Externally they can be used to get rid of common-mode junk e.g. on speaker leads. They don't touch the differential mode audio signal. When used on a single wire, so subject to the audio signal, you need to choose the right ferrite.
Last edited:
Sure we all agree on this as theory and practical application.John,
At audio frequencies and up to 1-2 MHz, lossy ferrite SMD's are almost entirely resistive at very low single digit Ohms. If you are using beads over device leads, the DC and LF resistance contribution is zero. The real work of ferrites is done at 5-10 MHZ and higher.
Yes, I do hear reduction in garbage/demodulated garbage.You will not hear anything at audio other than a significant reduction in HF ( i.e MHz) demodulated garbage on your system. I'd take ferrites over BQP's any day. And at a few pennies, they are a real bargain.
I also hear an injection of a signature new sound that changes according to the ferrite example.
BQP gives a 'cleaning' but adds a signature of its own.
Yes much informative stuff....thanks for the pointer to revisit.See the Murata website for more details.
Basics of noise countermeasures [Lesson 8] Ferrite Cores
That return energy is not linear and I find that such ferrites do affect/effect baseband audio.<Principle by which ferrite cores remove noise>
Ferrite cores come in various shapes, but most are ring-shaped. By passing conducting wires through the hole of the ring, the conducting wires and the ferrite core form a coil (inductor). This coil (inductor) is based on the same principle as that of an electronic part inductor, so the impedance increases together with the frequency as shown in Figure 1. Therefore, the coil functions as a low-pass filter that blocks high-frequency current, enabling attenuation of high-frequency noise. Furthermore, the use of a ferrite core also provides an additional effect. When current flows to an inductor comprising a ferrite core, magnetic flux is generated in the ferrite core, and the current energy is converted into magnetic energy. However, when the current changes, this magnetic flux is converted back into current by electromagnetic induction. At this time, not all of the magnetic flux energy is returned to current energy, and some is lost as magnetic loss. (This is called "hysteresis loss.") As a result, part of the noise current passing through the conducting wires is lost as magnetic loss, reducing the energy. The right side of Figure 1 shows the impedance characteristics of a coil with conducting wires passed through a ferrite core. The impedance of a normal coil consists mostly of the reactance (X) component, but when a ferrite core is used, the resistance (R) component becomes extremely large. This is a result of selecting ferrite materials suitable for noise countermeasures, and causes the noise energy consumption effect due to magnetic loss to account for a larger portion of the noise removal effect of the ferrite core than the current limiting effect of high impedance.
Yes, HF junk can add a dithering/masking of sorts.Could it be that the HF junk was adding a soothing and unnatural smudginess to the sound, which you miss when it has been removed?
And No, I don't miss that extra layer of modulation.
Could you elaborate please.Ferrites do, of course, have to be used with care. Externally they can be used to get rid of common-mode junk e.g. on speaker leads. They don't touch the differential mode audio signal. When used on a single wire, so subject to the audio signal, you need to choose the right ferrite.
Dan.
You also get ferrite bead devices, where the component lead passes through the ferrite core, also available with multiple leads for common mode purposes... Used extensively with caps to form pi or t filters often on inputs to keep HF noise out...
The difference between ferrite beads and BQPs though is reality, on is based on reality on is based on BS.....
The difference between ferrite beads and BQPs though is reality, on is based on reality on is based on BS.....
Yes, I am well familiar with such devices/systems.You also get ferrite bead devices, where the component lead passes through the ferrite core, also available with multiple leads for common mode purposes... Used extensively with caps to form pi or t filters often on inputs to keep HF noise out...
The ad copy might be BS.... could be the maker does not fully understand his creation.The difference between ferrite beads and BQPs though is reality, one is based on reality one is based on BS.....
Either way I find that ferrites and BQP (and others) affect/effect baseband audio and I think in a way not fully attributable to HF/RF attenuation/absorption.
Dan.
Sorry but have to disagree on BQP, common how can he not understand it.... stretching the imagination somewhat....
Regarding ferrites I don't see fears of it affecting other analogue signals (or audio) in other walks of life, strange, but then they don't use BQPs, even stranger!!!😱
Regarding ferrites I don't see fears of it affecting other analogue signals (or audio) in other walks of life, strange, but then they don't use BQPs, even stranger!!!😱
If you put an audio current (i.e. a single wire, not a signal and return pair) through a ferrite then it is conceivable that the non-linear nature of the ferrite could reflect back on the signal. This would mean that the circuit was low impedance and the ferrite has high permeability. This could be the case if you were using the ferrite as an inductor to stop low frequency RF. Bad use of ferrite! To stop low freq RF you need a choke, which either uses ferrite with a good airgap or a dust iron core. To stop high freq RF you can use a lower permeability but higher loss ferrite. As always in engineering, you need to read and understand the datasheets and understand exactly what you are trying to achieve. Simply slapping on a ferrite to an existing circuit may cause problems. That doesn't mean that ferrite is bad for audio; just that poor engineering is bad for audio.Max Headroom said:That return energy is not linear and I find that such ferrites do affect/effect baseband audio.
You can, however, simply slap a ferrite on a signal and return pair as the audio signal seen by the ferrite is zero.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II