John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet, where are the measurements?

Jan

I have the equipment still in storage... did it years ago. For your entertainment, I could do it again I suppose.

I recall the field radiated from speaker cable (music source) was easy to measure 3 feet from cable. I watched the meter needle kick to the bass notes (higher current flow).

One of the reasons I have so much test equipment is curiosity and to learn what 'things' really, actually do in a system. In this case, afterwards, I went to shielded cords/cable.



Thx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
What I mean is that without a LISN you cannot properly compare different power cables.

true ... you need a standard. Not sure the LISN is the appropriate model for audio. But something which captures the 20-20KHz freqs in the comparison.

In my case, I wasn't looking for which one to purchase or best one etc. But to just reduce what I had as much as possible.




-RM
 
Last edited:
WOW! The new BenchMark DAC-3 is way better (listening-wise) than the -1 or -2 previous model.

The DAC 1 was good. The DAC-2 was slightly better. But the DAC-3 is a whole 'nother thing. Truly, Excellent now.


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
I recall the field radiated from speaker cable (music source) was easy to measure 3 feet from cable. I watched the meter needle kick to the bass notes (higher current flow).


Thx-RNMarsh

I can accept that. I have spend hours receiving stray emissions from PC-to-display and keyboard-to-PC in military facilities at 100m outside of the fence, to the point that we could hand over email printouts to the consternated commander.

And I noticed that you switched from mains cables to speaker cables.

Jan
 

If we left-click on the enlarge arrow left lower corner, the image goes full screen. No need for anything more elaborate.

George
 

Attachments

  • Ed1.PNG
    Ed1.PNG
    113.7 KB · Views: 205
  • Ed2.PNG
    Ed2.PNG
    167.4 KB · Views: 202
  • Ed3.PNG
    Ed3.PNG
    606.4 KB · Views: 194
I would like to point out something that I am attempting to do here on this tread, and have tried to do for more than 10 years. I am trying to keep peoples' response to audio component sound quality open for discussion. I also would like to promote more serious measurement efforts that actually give us more insight as to why we appear to hear better than most measurements show significant difference.
Measurements are not always taken very seriously, when they go outside the typical norms such as IM or harmonic distortion.
Historically, I remember when Walt Jung did a long research article on SID with two other guys. One was a former CAL Berkeley classmate of mine who then worked at Sound Technology, and another guy who worked at Signetics (I think). Both got cold feet about publishing this excellent article at the time due to pressure from mid fi manufacturers, who did not like to 'rock the boat'. These 'heads of industry' didn't think much of me, either. Today, if we read this series of articles, most of us would say something like: 'Of course, it should be obvious'. Well it wasn't back in the late 70's, but that is how we progress over the decades.
 
There are many ways to test for noise on/in/from cables. A CT or Current transformer, an inductive probe and even wide band transformer.

Just what is it you want to see? The speaker wire field radiated used a TriField meter. calibrated at 60Hz. The fields of interest were the magnetic field with this unit.

THx-RNMarsh
 
Yes, I would say it's clearly better than DAC-1. Never tried a DAC-2. But, as I said before after getting a DAC-3, I'm still not sure it's transparent. It's certainly closer though. Found a good home for the DAC-1 too, somebody who will make good use of it.
This morning I took out the DAC 2 and replaced it with the DAC 3 without telling my lady. I started playing music and as she walked by the speakers, she paused and listened and said, you can hear the string vibration. She did not know I even bought the DAC3.

This is good example of people who are very familiar with a system over a long time period and hear a change easily .... but probably would not be able to tell better than 50-50 between the two in DBLT.

her comments afterwards all confirm my listening impressions also that the DAC 3 is a significant audible improvement.


-RM
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.