JLH 10 Watt class A amplifier

Hello all,

This may be of some help, not sure, I always put one of these at the mains input it's an RFI/EMI filter
08.jpg

I'm going to do a screencast hence the warning
One of Steve Wagner's JLH test videos does show squiggly bits on a square wave, caused by the use of an SMPS, can't recall which one though
This is the one I'm using I did not put in R10 and C6 on Steve's drawing, he didn't either to begin with, a further test with both revealed no difference.

Cheers and thanks - I'm still a very Happy Listener Ooooo I can scarcely believe what I'm hearing now, just got in from my little room.
 
Last edited:
It can't do any harm, but I don't think there's any gain by using it,
Keep all ac primary and secondary far away from amp signal, twist them, make the short.
And don't use snubbers on rectifier if you don't have the quasimodo, the can produce bad ringing if incorrect values.
As for smps, a pi filter after DC output might be an idea, meaning a low pass filter that removes switching noise.
It's a simple filter and calculators are online, but you need a scope to see which noise to filter for.
 
Toooo much problems, I think;-)

All do complain, that the JLH, similar to the Hiraga, has no deeps. But it is not.

An other question: why an other amp, when it has to sound as all the other;-?

SE, or similar, sound much finer, with much more solution than a, every, complementary-pp. Has "space". The Hiraga, similar, has not. In the deeps too. That, in my mind, is one reason. The most misunderstand as less bass. The "build of" of the amp does influence very much the sound. SE much much more. But too complex the know-how to convey.

All these speakers are to tune. All these speakers are roaring. I am very sure;-)

In my mind, too, the damping factor is a problem very very very seldom. If, than higher the capacity of the psu;-) Or, better, tune the roaring speakers.-)

To get more "sound", as the Hiraga, in the deeps too, I would reduce the capacity.
Or, better, I would set 12 x 10 mF: sounds more fluid.
I would remove the bypass-100 nF.
Do you use lugs or crimps or other gray sounding stuff?
And I would use just 2 windings of the trafo. May be, than the deeps are just 2 meters behind;-)
I would connect the 2 psus. I would get a cleaner sound, more "one voice", one corpus, less rumpus;-)
I would not use lace. I would use solid core, 2 x 0,8 mm, or so: less noise.
I would reduce the distance speaker - speaker. To get ONE Voice, ONE corpus, ONE room. May be: 1,5 m or less!!!
I would focus the speaker 50 cm ahead the tip of my nose;>)
...
and so on, and so on, and so on;-)

LG
what is lace? painted copper wire?
 
Just Google "shielded wire". I think LG refers to this (i.e. a braided wire sheath over insulated wire cable) when he says "lace". It really should be used on all wired runs of signal connections that are prone to noise radiated by AC conductor leads of any kind, power or audio circuits. Without redesigning the circuits, your alternatives are to just endure any environmental or locally generated noise, rebuild the amp. with greater separation between power and signal level conductors or substitute for the cable with ground-connected, sheet metal plates between noise sensitive sections.

Not all shielded wire cable is suitable. Small sizes may have high capacitance/meter which cumulatively affects bandwidth - particularly high impedance circuits. You can measure and compare the capacitance if your instruments are capable of some accuracy in the range of 5-50 pF, which should cover most needs.

Claiming that shielded cable is bad without qualification though, is rather naive when the signal has already passed through enormous lengths of it in multiple circuits of various impedances. The problem with applying shielded cable is in misunderstanding what is meant to do, the type and the conditions for best use, since its not a single product of only one specification, nor is it a universal fix for noise ingress.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cumbb and Wik
It's been mentioned many times in this everlasting, recycling thread, that speaker protection with almost all power amplifiers is primarily about blocking DC voltage from being present at the output terminals. DC melts bass speaker voice coils unless the speaker crossover also contains a huge series cap. which doubly eliminates any DC risk. That fault is usually caused by a failure (i.e. short circuit) of one or both output transistors but it could have started with overheating rather than overdrive or because of other failures, parts sourcing and construction errors or just sloppy assembly work.

Thankfully, since the output is polarised at half the single supply voltage, we already have that thumping great output capacitor on board and caps don't pass DC, right? - JLH '69 Protection solved....no nasty relay contacts to cause trouble either 👌
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cumbb
I've used 3,900 or 4,700 uF caps for some years now. The extra capacitance doesn't make a lot of difference to low bass performance - almost none at all, if your speakers are bookshelf size which many of us will be using because of cost, space restrictions for a second system or maybe yours will be a desktop application etc. Anyways, I have some sensitive, floorstanding speakers that only need a few watts to let the neighbours hear what I like. The convincing bass from just a 10W amplifier never sounded so good to me, at least.
 
Load impedance and output capacitance requirements are related. The lower the actual speaker impedance, the more capacitance needed for a given bass response. Check JLH's suggestions covering 3-15 Ohm speakers in the parts tables provided in the original magazine article and referenced many times here.