Scheduled for feasibility study Image is too big error without info on what you want from image size and type.

This issue is considered important and has been scheduled for further investigation or feasibility as time and priorities allow

PRR

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
testing... yes, waxx's file is under 4MB, runs to 90+%, and then says "The uploaded image is too big." Which disagrees with "10MB" in documentation found somewhere else.

However.... why do we need a 6000 pixel image IN a forum message? Are we studying image grain? The cone is larger than life. 1500px is plenty big for my screen.

20220110-DSC_0120-quarter-size.jpg


And is under 1MB, with minimal compression. 0.26MB with web-appropriate compression.
 
for me it's that i need to convert the files, not the size (that is determined by my reflex camera). It's still as unhandy as before (which is a minor issue) but it's mainly that there is not defined limit (which is the major issue). It was better before because i knew what the limits were.
 
I think you're all missing the point, the point is not the size, but the lack of definition of what size and format is wanted. If it needs to be smaller, it can, but tell me what size like on the old site.


Does it matter?
The example I've given works on several boards where a full 6MB photo is too large, which many other boards can handle.

No one else complains.