I don't believe cables make a difference, any input?

Status
Not open for further replies.
yeah right...

GIGO? A quick scan of the first 50 pages of that title on Google Books suggests its focus is data analysis. Grind all the numbers you want, if the acquisition process is flawed the ony thing you'll get from it is comfort.

Cite cable tests you feel fully meet proper criteria. Why is it those incessantly banging the objectivity shoe on the podium never step up to the plate when asked for the most trivial of scientific supporting evidence: measurements vs. audibility thresholds or proper citations? Is a 30+ year old audio club demo the best you have?

Obviously, your reading and interpretation skills need improving...the 1st 50 pages are a review of statistics..then comes experimentasl design... I suggested that BECAUSE most of the subjective drivel in this thread has little merit beyond the beliefs of the posters... cite one cable test that definitively proves expensive designer cables and/or exotic designs and styles DO make a difference... the balls in your court, not mine...
 
I understand. The Preview went from page 50 to 400. From that even a 'believer' was able to deduce it had more than 50 pages.
I replied to this:

We should be discussing alpha and beta error, confidence intervals, confounded trial design criteria, etc....

A page and a half back, remember? Your post focused on data analysis. The larger GIGO point still stands, and still stands avoided. No worries, I've asked the same questions for 15 years and wasn't really expecting any different answer.
 
Hello Jacob2.

This is how the test was performed that SY's speaking of...
=========================================================================
3a) The same song, Steely Dan's Aja, was always used. I find this song to be invaluable, especially if I'm attempting to discriminate between two ICs I might be having difficulty with. When this happens I'll listen specifically to when the drummer stops his solo and hits his drumsticks together (4:56-4:57) into the song. I've found transients are often where ICs sound uniquely different and the striking of these drumsticks often helps me to deteremine if the IC has been changed or not!


~Rational Subjectivism. It's An Acquired Taste!~

This sounds uniquely unfun to me. It is difficult for me to envision listening for a high resolution artifact entering into a preference decision for listening to a broad range of music for enjoyment. In fact it borders on an objective measurment technique or worse fooling the ABX with its switch clicks.
 
Last edited:
jakop, the ABX is the most popular and i did not want to go into further detail.
Play your system to me and i can tell you if i like it. As i said before i have outgrown of that kind of tests a long time ago. For example look what the Boston Audio Society put into the AES magazine. A chain of AD/DA converter with 16Bit/44kHz sampling was indistingquishable from a straight wire bypass !
Now comes the rub ! Have you seen the picture what speaker they use and how the where placed ! I really got a shock ! 20 years of work done by me thrown in the waiste bin. I simply think that soudquality of that system was poor as always in "Scietific Tests".
 
That's terrible. There's too much money/politics in audio I think, they just design tests to fail. There's something wrong when you can get high resolution sound in most movies, but still main stream music companies are dragging there feet and riding the MP3 juggernaut.
 
The way I look at it is this. Even though in theory 44.1 16-bit is a "uncompressed" format in practice it is used as a lossy format in terms of CD-DA. To me the whole thing about me not being able to hear it is cool and all but I would just rather have something that is technically closer to the master recording and less messed with. There aren't many Engineers that will go straight to 44.1 from analog and there are even less that would mix that way directly in digital. 44.1 imo is just too close of a nyquist frequency to what we can demonstratively hear and 24-bit is a no-brainer since this seems to be the point where digital actually starts benchmarking better than hi end analog. So I am for hi res because I can take the hard drive and bandwidth hit just to get a little bit closer to the original.
 
LOL, if you say so. 😀

Wow they actually have specs on these things I think haha.

Horizon XLR Male to 1/4" TRS Audio Cable (Assorted Lengths)

In studio applications that require a balanced cable, these handmade ultra quiet cables set the standard. These cables are custom made for us using Neutrik and Switch Craft connectors.

Conductors (2) 24 Gauge Silver
Shield Pure Copper Spiral
Shield Coverage 95%
Jacket Matte PVC
O.D. 0.210"
Capacitance 37 pf/ft. @ 1 kHz
Resistance 23 ohm @ 20C / 1000'

I think I have 1 3ft, 1 6 ft, 1 10 ft and 1 15ft cable. Should I have matched them looking back in retrospect?:cheeky:
 
Last edited:
Edited by Key: cause that was just mean of me lol.

Anyway I guess I can understand that in a weird capitalistic sort of way. But er don't you want the public to just hear it the best it can be? Or the way it's supposed to be?
 
Last edited:
But do we really "create" music? Like conjure it up from nowhere? Or do we just find patterns? I have written a lot of music and I honestly can't tell where originality begins and ends at this point in the game.

Maybe some of my stuff uses unique chord progressions and harmonies or something (hard to be sure) but do I really own them once I play them in public?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.