How is harmonic distortion processed with regard to being encountered in a sweep. Eg is it recognised and reassigned to the fundamental, is it attached to the impulse at the start, or at some inappropriate time?
IIRC each harmonic appears as an impulse that precedes the main impulse, with the higher harmonics appearing earlier in time. Some papers on the topic here:
A. Farina | Semantic Scholar
A. Farina | Semantic Scholar
Hi Guys,
my HolmImpulse gets lost. I did not found a working download link. Can anybody help?
Leo
my HolmImpulse gets lost. I did not found a working download link. Can anybody help?
Leo
The 1st link I went to worked, though there was a slight delay and stopped it before it could finish since I don't want it: https://download.cnet.com/HOLMImpulse/3000-2170_4-75910359.html
thanks a lot - the above download link works finePM
I can email you 32 an 64 version
Under Windows 10 the 32 bit version is more stable for me. Try both, but 64 bit crashed a lot on my install.
I secured the files here, 32-bit and 64-bit versions, including .Net runtimes: https://rephase.org/dl/Holm/
That is good to know!Under Windows 10 the 32 bit version is more stable for me. Try both, but 64 bit crashed a lot on my install.
English please.
Unfortunately I don't think there will be. I live in hope that someone will become the new maintainer for this software.I would like to know if there will be a new version of HOLMimpuse?
As far as I can tell, there is no more Holm Acoustics company. Does anyone know?
It would be great for all of us if some of the powerful parts of HOLM code could be used in some other software.
It would be great for all of us if some of the powerful parts of HOLM code could be used in some other software.
Member
Joined 2003
Isn't that the exact content I collected (with microsoft runtimes) and made available a few posts above?
For me there are several things that HOLM does better than REW.What parts of Holm can you not achieve with REW or ARTA?
- Sound cards. HOLM is better than any measurement software I've ever used at dealing with sound cards. REW seems very clunky in that regard.
- Timing. HOLM needs no second channel or acoustic markers to measure time. It is very accurate and repeatable at measuring time offsets. The time lock feature is extremely useful and easy. This might be related to point #1
- Phase. Because of the difficulties in timing, I've never gotten a useful phase measurement from REW. In HOLM, it's just there and makes sense. This is probably related to point #2
- Measurement import. HOLM can compare any two files and show the FR difference. Unlike REW that needs a very specific format of sweep and even then often refuses to import even it's own sweeps. HOLM does care as long as the files are at the same sample rate. You can compare two sweeps, a sweep and an impulse, an impulse and a sound or even two songs. It's a handy feature.
- Impulses. It is called HOLM Impulse for a reason. 🙂 The way HOLM handles impulses feels more solid and useful than other softwares.
Hello, yes, it.Non è il contenuto esatto che ho raccolto (con i runtime di Microsoft) e reso disponibile in alcuni post sopra ?
- Home
- Design & Build
- Software Tools
- HOLMImpulse: Measuring Frequency & Impulse Response