Help with this amp? A patchwork product of simulation

Status
Not open for further replies.
MJL21193 said:
Hi Nico,
The magnified scale is 2.1uS. When I say 1MHz, that's really a ballpark figure. I'd like to know if it's possible that this is the result of parasitic inductance/capacitance between the output trace and the negative rail.

Here's a shot of the top half of the wave magnified 10X. No ringing.


Its bcs you use your 1MHz calibration on board scope gen? I see almost half a scale of your negative square ringing in your 21μs setting pic, so it must be a 100kHz problem?
 
MJL21193 said:
Hi Nico,
The magnified scale is 2.1uS. When I say 1MHz, that's really a ballpark figure. I'd like to know if it's possible that this is the result of parasitic inductance/capacitance between the output trace and the negative rail.

Here's a shot of the top half of the wave magnified 10X. No ringing.

John this could very well be the probe, it is probably 10 Meg at 1 or more PF, you are feeding it with a very low impedance. Try using simple wire and crocodile jaws in stead of the probe.
 
John also try a sine wave at high output, if you see ripple in the rising or falling this is oscillation in the amp. If you do not have a sine wave generator, use your PC card. I will email you a generator. It is pretty good for general purpose jobs.
 
salas said:



Its bcs you use your 1MHz calibration on board scope gen? I see almost half a scale of your negative square ringing in your 21¼s setting pic, so it must be a 100kHz problem?


Hi Salas,
The calibrator is variable. The oscillation is posted back in post#432. This is at 247nS/div giving ~500nS for the wave. That's close to 1MHz.
 
Nico Ras said:


John this could very well be the probe, it is probably 10 Meg at 1 or more PF, you are feeding it with a very low impedance. Try using simple wire and crocodile jaws in stead of the probe.

The input impedance to the amp is 500K (R15, across the input). Probe reads a clean squarewave though the connecting cable, not connected to the amp.

Nico Ras said:
John also try a sine wave at high output, if you see ripple in the rising or falling this is oscillation in the amp. If you do not have a sine wave generator, use your PC card. I will email you a generator. It is pretty good for general purpose jobs.

No sound card (see above)!! I'll need to go out tomorrow and pick one up.
Thanks Nico, but I already have a PC function generator.
 
salas said:
Yes, now I went back and saw what you mean. That high, it may well be the probe interaction you know. Examine and exclude that please.

Hi Salas,
I don't normally connect the scope unless I want to test or I think there's a problem. After I started on full power, I noticed it was heating up quickly, without any signal present. I checked the idle current - 190mA! too hot, but the Vbe pot will not decrease it. It's then that I believe it's oscillating. Cut power, connect the scope an sure enough, oscillation.

Don S said:
John, I have not seen the latest schematic. Are your outputs 3281's and 1302's for this version? What load are you using for testing?

Don S


Hi Don,
The outputs are MJL3281A/1302A for this build. The load is a 4 ohm coax car speaker in a smallish sealed box.
Schematic is here:
 

Attachments

No Oscillation at all with any reasonable idle current now with latest changes. The ringing in the bottom half of the squarewave is most it does now, but like I demonstrated a few posts ago, only at normal idle current.
Of course, this ringing is the key to the oscillation that I experienced before. I need to eliminate the source of it.
 
Hi,

About oscillation: what about changing C14's value - or completely remove it from circuit?

Your schematic shows R18 as 560r. I'd say that ~2mA (1.1V/560r) bias current for the drivers is too low. I'd rather try 50...200r as R18.
 
salas said:
In your schematic I would try C9=47uF, R10=4.7k trimmer pot, and R17+R24= single 2k7 resistor. And see if it cuts the bias effectively.


I will change C9 and see if this makes a difference. I realised too late that I should have configured the bias as you have detailed.
Oh well, there's always the new board revision. 🙂
 
The 47uF only substitution may work, if not, make a hardwired 'bug like' construction of the whole recommendation, just to test. Don't make any V2 board for such a small thing. I agree with the other guys to see about C14 too.
 
And the winner is....Donk! Removing the 15pF solved the ringing. I will now reduce R18 (no, not a typo Don) to a more sensible number.

Nice 20Khz square wave, NO? 🙂
 

Attachments

  • im001210.jpg
    im001210.jpg
    97.5 KB · Views: 343
salas said:
Bravo! THAT'S progress.


I'll say. All that messing around for one silly cap.

I have reduced R18 to down to 280 ohms (560R in parallel to the existing). No signs of instability. I will further reduce it to 220R a little later. I'm going to work on the resistor values for the Vbe also - Nico suggested that they may be too high.

Thanks for help, fellas.🙂
I'm very pleased with the results. It makes the time spent working on it worth it when it turns out well.

A little more tinkering and I'll post a revised schematic
 
MJL21193 said:



I'll say. All that messing around for one silly cap.

I have reduced R18 to down to 280 ohms (560R in parallel to the existing). No signs of instability. I will further reduce it to 220R a little later. I'm going to work on the resistor values for the Vbe also - Nico suggested that they may be too high.

Thanks for help, fellas.🙂
I'm very pleased with the results. It makes the time spent working on it worth it when it turns out well.

A little more tinkering and I'll post a revised schematic

ITS LIKE COOKING WITH GAS!!!!!
 
Its always a bit surprising from sim to bench. Typical stuff. I only patch the feedback after I see the finished real layout performance on the scope... I saw your thread only today. I see you use 30dB gain. What is the 8 Ohm power? How much is your feedback? Are you about to listen with those nicely curved 3ways with passive cross or you are building 6 channels to go straight to active?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.