TBH, if you mention Ayesha to me, it comes out as some hammer-horror fantasy film about She who must be obeyed.
A ripping yarn, IMO. IIRC, tasty actress Ursula Andress played a very dangerous Queen back in Africa. She'd cast you into the pit as quick as look at you. 😱
Back in the Real World, I was reviewing some of my friend Wayne's pictures of 1987.
Everything seemed to be mooching along happily, until in October 1987, our World in London (and particularly Holland Park) was ripped apart by the unexpected Hurricane of 100 mph winds.
Not often you see system7 in the wild. Looking very Oxford-Don, IMO. I was smitten by my friend David Bagley's Down's Syndrome daughter. Such a sweet kid. Whatever did she do to be dealt such a dumb deal of cards? Life is cruel. 🙁
A ripping yarn, IMO. IIRC, tasty actress Ursula Andress played a very dangerous Queen back in Africa. She'd cast you into the pit as quick as look at you. 😱
Back in the Real World, I was reviewing some of my friend Wayne's pictures of 1987.
Everything seemed to be mooching along happily, until in October 1987, our World in London (and particularly Holland Park) was ripped apart by the unexpected Hurricane of 100 mph winds.
Not often you see system7 in the wild. Looking very Oxford-Don, IMO. I was smitten by my friend David Bagley's Down's Syndrome daughter. Such a sweet kid. Whatever did she do to be dealt such a dumb deal of cards? Life is cruel. 🙁
Attachments
I'd rather mention the lovable Ayshea than the feared Ayesha of H. Rider Haggard fame! 😉TBH, if you mention Ayesha to me, it comes out as some hammer-horror fantasy film about She who must be obeyed.
Did you miss the UFO action that took place in 1987, Steve?Everything seemed to be mooching along happily, until in October 1987, our World in London was ripped apart by the unexpected Hurricane of 100 mph winds.
- 19 November 1987 at 7 pm: the Black Country. UFO - a large UFO was seen at close quarters hovering over houses in Brierley Hill.
- 1 December 1987: Philip Spencer (not his real name), a retired policeman, took a picture on Ilkley Moor, which is claimed to be of an alien creature, and then saw a white coloured craft leaving the area. The object in the photograph was examined by Kodak Laboratories at Hemel Hempsted and they decided that the object was not superimposed. This was one of the few British close encounters of the third kind. Under hypnosis he claimed to have been abducted and medically examined.
As Arthur C. Clarke said: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."Clearly all this Flying Saucer stuff is hoey. Personally I can't think of anything that goes faster than light, or backwards in time. A belief in psychic powers isn't my idea of a good bet either.
Advances in high-frequency switching power supplies and Class D amplification have made amplifiers and cell phones possible now that would have seemed like magic or "alien technology" to most, had they been released 50 years ago.
Any common "smart phone" has far more processing power than computers used for calculating our first forays into space. Fractal based antennas used in them have also reduced size and material use by "unbelievable" amounts.
Processors are fast enough now that for practical intents, FIR filters could almost be considered to "go backwards in time", correcting phase problems before we have a chance to hear them.
Personally, I can conceptualize faster than light travel, or time traveling backwards, though have no more chance of making a practical version of either technology than I would of duplicating the many devices we use daily.
If you were to see a Levitron "Anti-gravity" top floating above a wood base (patent #4382245), and were unaware of the hidden torus-shaped magnet beneath it, your insight of how it works would be a guess.
Reading patents that do little to explain unknown technologies also leads to guesses, some of which may eventually turn out to be correct 😉
Art
Attachments
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
...saw a white coloured craft leaving the area.
ah yes, the white van man 😀
I was probably distracted by the Hurricane of 1987. It actually turned into the great "Property Crash" of 1987. The Far Eastern markets disintegrated the next day.
AFAIK, Japan has never recovered. An odd coincidence. 😕
My London friend, Wayne, in the first photo, is high on good looks, hopeless with women, and low on common-sense. As gifted an artist as I have ever met. I have offered him huge sums for his paintings. But he has yet to bite. 🙂
One of his finest moments, IMO: the second photo which he took. "What (quoth he) is noticeable about this picture of the flagpoles at the Commonwealth Institute?"
I didn't get it, TBH. I thought it was something about Nations. In fact, all our vanity is just about providing perches for DUMB BIRDS! 😀
AFAIK, Japan has never recovered. An odd coincidence. 😕
My London friend, Wayne, in the first photo, is high on good looks, hopeless with women, and low on common-sense. As gifted an artist as I have ever met. I have offered him huge sums for his paintings. But he has yet to bite. 🙂
One of his finest moments, IMO: the second photo which he took. "What (quoth he) is noticeable about this picture of the flagpoles at the Commonwealth Institute?"
I didn't get it, TBH. I thought it was something about Nations. In fact, all our vanity is just about providing perches for DUMB BIRDS! 😀
Attachments
I think these flying saucer designers were taken in by the child's toy:
Levitron -- Spin stabilized magnetic levitation
All the stuff about superconductors and microwaves and inertial reduction is just hoey.
Eugene Podkletnov - Wikipedia

Levitron -- Spin stabilized magnetic levitation
All the stuff about superconductors and microwaves and inertial reduction is just hoey.
Eugene Podkletnov - Wikipedia
There's a video from Duke University on metamaterials here:
YouTube
As i understand it, what metamaterial are good for, is bending a wave similar to what a prism can do.
The waves that are being bent are simply microwaves.
Here's a description of how the UFO uses microwaves to generate a polarized vaccuum around the craft, as described in U.S. Navy patent US20170313446A1:
"A craft using an inertial mass reduction device comprises of an inner resonant cavity wall, an outer resonant cavity, and microwave emitters. The electrically charged outer resonant cavity wall and the electrically insulated inner resonant cavity wall form a resonant cavity. The microwave emitters create high frequency electromagnetic waves throughout the resonant cavity causing the resonant cavity to vibrate in an accelerated mode and create a local polarized vacuum outside the outer resonant cavity all."
The microwave emitters are an electromagnetic field generator, as described in U.S. Navy patent US10135366B2:
That patent leaves a breadcrumb, describing "Their research involves the use of high Radio frequency/Microwave driven resonant cavity Q-thruster technology within the context of Quantum Vacuum Plasma physics."
Here's some info on "microwave driven resonant cavity Q-thruster technology:"
Quantum vacuum thruster - Wikipedia
Here's some stuff to think about, from someone who's grasp on physics is poor:
In a ported subwoofer, we know that we can tune the subwoofer for a very narrow high Q peak.
From reading the patents, the electromagnetic field generators are doing something similar, but instead of generating audio waves they're generating microwaves. The microwaves are exceptionally small. For instance, the microwaves that we used to use for cel phones were a third of a meter long. The microwaves described in the Navy patent are 60 microns long. That's 6/100ths of a millimeter.
The "waveguide" of the meta material has an even smaller aperture, just 3 microns, or three one-thousandths of a millimeter.
I still have lots of questions:
2) why are such small microwaves ideal for this?
1) is the resonant cavity, described in the patent, in the metamaterial? Or in the gap between the inner and outer hull of the UFO?
I haven't written about gravitational waveguides in five years, but someone on Reddit wrote this description which is eerily similar to what's in the patents:
"So if you are talking about a typical flying disk/rotating lenticular-body spacecraft, the outer shell itself is made of a dielectric (typically a doped aluminum alloy), this dielectric 'skin' is directly applied over the interior shell of the craft, it is self-assembling and adheres to the craft, creating a gap (a vacuum) between itself and the inner shell (you just spray the skin on to apply it, its made of microspheres) - so in a very real sense the skin of the craft is 'alive' (hence the 'self-healing', it has shape memory). That being said, it is a metal - a shiny gray more than a silver.
Now the craft looks like a torus wrapped around a sphere, flying saucer (very thin rotating outer disk, that gets thicker near the spherical cockpit). Not-fancy ones utilize the spinning disc as a magnetorquer(only works on earth/using a magnetic field like earths), enabling buoyant in-orbit flight, where the craft stays spin-stabilized against inertia/gravity, and then propulsion is done through a sliding mass system inside the craft, put the mass where you want to go). These are also the same ones that you see tilt their craft at the angle in the direction they are about to move (the bob lazar saucer).
These ones just look like saucers most the time, though a system of two spherical shells is also possible to make work with this.
More advanced craft utilize a ferromagnetic skin(for parametric resonance), enabling them to utilize an RF emitter and apply an electric field to polarize the vacuum in between the skin @ the inner shell, which is now producing entropy (particles, photons in this case), and then those photons get trapped inside the cavity (thanks to the em field), which generates a torque on the spin-2 tensor that provides 'thrust' through an applied field. A mems device then rapidly oscillates the emission of microwaves into the nanocavities, utilizing the application of them to control the craft. Thrust is merely limited by energy production, through utilization of a fission-fusion fast reactor, Δv >10,000m/s is possible. You will see plasma flowing all around the craft as it is stabilizing and thrusting itself, with the brightest area being opposite of where it is moving (the craft technically pulls itself along).
If you catch a lenticular one, it'll stay aligned to the vertical-plane (altitude) through the continuous spinning of its disc, and will move much more erratically as stopping/starting are very easy for it. That being said, any craft that typically uses these methods also tend to instead utilize a morphing body design. These craft - especially the very advanced ones - are able to edit their skin/shape in real time in order to best match whatever task it is they are doing. Normally this means that if its not accelerating, then its pretending to be a cloud, or a plane.. or anything else that doesn't catch your eye. When it moves however, it quickly illuminates all over the skin and around the craft, depending on where and what its doing to move. It doesn't emit much light, but is very bright (the photons are trapped by the vacuum around the skin of the craft).
The first craft won't harm you if you are near it - as far as propulsion technologies go. The second type will cause physical harm if its too close, if you ever see a spacecraft that is emitting plasma (you see plumes of colored 'flame') or something similar, don't approach, you'll get seriously sick and even potentially die.
If its triangular, and it's not 1000+ meters long, it's probably ours so just stop worrying about it. Even if we didn't have any 'antigrav' we HAVE had hypersonic spaceplanes in orbit for 50 years now, so triangles are very likely to be us.
I mean, we don't even 'have' this yet: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269071185_The_Morningstar_Energy_Box
BTW there are another type of craft, they look similar but are completely differently designed. They utilize type-II superconductors to produce an enhanced 'Gertsenshtein' effect, or in essence - allow the conditions for certain types of travel to be met. These are the super advanced ones, they are able to remotely manipulate spacetime (meaning manipulate a position of spacetime that is not locally connected to the craft), enabling technologies like portals (Einstein–Rosen bridges), and likely some form of time travel. They should be able to move around the world line/time line in some way, I couldn't tell you exactly how though.
The author's reference here : "If its triangular, and it's not 1000+ meters long, it's probably ours so just stop worrying about it. Even if we didn't have any 'antigrav' we HAVE had hypersonic spaceplanes in orbit for 50 years now, so triangles are very likely to be us."
Are these, which have been appearing all over the world with great frequency this month:
(Note the video is twelve years old - these have been around a while.)
Are these, which have been appearing all over the world with great frequency this month:
Attachments
I guess no one cares that the disc is spinning at Mach 10? That’s like space craft re-entry speed. And it would probably take several Megwatts of power to get it to spin that fast.
I am not seeing how this is even related to audio.
Waveguides 🙂
I have one anecdotal account from a close friend at work. He was my office mate for years and I trust his word. He never lies (know from 10 years experience of being his friend). He told me that when he was young he lived on a tobacco plantation in NC. One day he and his brother were watching TV in the afternoon after school. Suddenly the TV flickered and went off. All lights in house stopped working. He heard a faint sound like whirring machinery outside. He stood at the doorway and saw a 20 ft diameter silver disc with a round mid section. It was levitating about 10 ft above the ground and 15 ft away from front door. Very close. There was no rush of air like a helicopter but just floated. It gave off a faint pink glow like a plasma. There was a window and he could see the occupants inside. They were not human - but humanoid like. Large heads and large eyes. It reads like out of a movie script with the description. It hovered for several minutes. Then floated higher and zig zagged abruptly back and forth then a flash of bright light and it disappeared like that. It returned the next day about the same time and similar experience. But never returned after that. Since his family was quite poor they had no cameras. This would have been circa 1978 or so.
Typical. What Einstein at the patent office awarded a patent for that indecipherable gibberish written in an alien language? 🤣So here we go... Gravitational Waveguides.
![]()
I may have seen one of these in San Diego. I am not sure. I will describe what I saw.
Almost every night in SoCal, the cool air rolls in from the ocean, caused by the temperature differential between the cool air above the Pacific Ocean, and the warm air about Southern California. This leads to overcast skies. Not clouds, just a big ol' blanket of fog, and a lot of humidity.
The light generated on the land is reflected off of the overcast skies, and it causes the sky too like quite bright, even at 10pm or 11pm at night.
Hold that thought...
The city of San Diego is ringed by military bases. There's Camp Pendleton to the north of Carlsbad, and a big chunk of downtown San Diego is basically a sprawling military base. Miramar (from the Top Gun movies) is located Northeeast of downtown San Diego. The San Diego airport is bracketed by the former SPAWAR facilities just north of the airport, along with former SPAWAR facilities out on Point Loma, west of the airport.
Due to the crazy amount of military bases, you just get accustomed to crazy military stuff flying overhead. It's like you just 'tune it out' after a while. There is nearly always something crazy flying overhead. (When I say "crazy" I don't mean black triangles. I mean things like an Osprey; I never saw one in my life until I moved to San Diego, then when I moved I started seeing them every week. There is ALWAYS something flying over your house if you live in San Diego. You just get used to it.)
The attached pic is not my house, but that's what the sky in San Diego looks like on a lot of nights. Grey and overcast.
One night, I was in my backyard. Although the sky was grey, there was a big chunk of the sky that was just blacker than the blackest black that you've ever seen. And it was a triangular shape.
In the second pic, I made an attempt to provide a visual of what the sky looked like that night.
In the movies, they always make UAPs appear to be absolutely astonishing or mind bending or frightening... but I didn't feel any of those emotions at all.
This will sound macabre, but the closest thing to describe how I felt, was when I once saw a fatal motorcycle accident that had just occurred on the freeway. Basically I was driving on the freeway, and traffic came to a screeching halt. Cars began to file into a single lane, to pass a motorcycle that had just crashed. I drove past what I assume (in hindsight) was a fatality. But my brain simply could not process it. It was no more than three feet away from my car, and I could see it as clear as day, but I just couldn't "compute" what I was seeing because I had never seen it before. This will sound absolutely ridiculous, but when I saw it, my brain jumped to "Why is there a styrofoam head on the asphalt over there?" If you put me on a lie detector test an hour later, and asked me to explain what I saw, I would have earnestly stated "I saw a styrofoam head laying on the freeway today and I don't know how it got there." I think our brains are wired in such a way that we try and rationalize the things we see, that are beyond what we can understand. (Obviously, that wasn't a mannequin, the motorcyclist had lost his life in an extremely violent way. But my brain could not compute what I was seeing.)
A couple of years later, I saw three lights doing weird things above Area 51, as I was driving in the desert at one of the highest points in elevation. That was downright serene, it was just like "hey that's neat." Wasn't scary, it was just a curiosity.
The same year, I saw something flying over March Air Force Base that was far more bizarre than either of these sightings. The one over March Air Force was almost completely inexplicable. It looked like some type of craft that was about the size of a 747 and it was doing something like figure eights in the air above the base. It was lit up like a Christmas tree; around a hundred lights that were uniform in color, a red that had a bit of orange in it. As with all the others, this was late at night. The most logical explanation is that it was a swarm of remote controlled drones. IE, the size of the 'swarm' was about as big as a 747, but I could not discern if the lights were independent objects, or if the lights were attached to a craft that was obscured by the light pollution produced by said lights. I refuse to call them 'orbs' like everyone in New Jersey is describing, because I was completely unable to discern if they were independent objects. The lights moved in perfect lockstep, which would indicate that they were either communicating with each other and following an identical flight path, or they were physically attached to something which was not visible. (I'm not sayin the craft was "invisible." I am saying that if a craft is black enough, it will disappear into the night sky and all you'll see are the lights. The Triangle in San Diego was visible BECAUSE of the fog. If it was a clear and cloudless night, I would have had absolutely no idea at all that it was there, because it was as black as black gets.)
This video is somewhat similar to what I saw, except the colors were orange-red, they flew in a repeating figure eight, and they were in perfect lockstep:
https://www.pond5.com/stock-footage/item/93681571-autonomous-drone-swarm-4k
Before anyone says "it's ALIENS," keep in mind there are a ton of unclassified articles that describe drone swarms. For instance, the US Navy has programs where they can set up wireless networks in the air using drones. Basically:
1) imagine the wifi network at an airport or office building. Hundreds or even thousands of wireless access points that communicate with each other to create a wireless mesh network.
2) Now put those wireless devices on a drone, and put the wireless network in the sky. Very useful in warfare; your team no longer has to rely on satellites for communication exclusively, it can bring a wireless network wherever it goes. Combine this with GPS and cameras and you have one heck of a surveillance system. Imagine being able to bring the wireless camera network that people have in their houses, put it up in the sky, and then multiply the size by a hundred.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=84039
"In recent years, researches of disseminating wireless network have been conducted for areas without network infrastructure such as disaster situation or military disputes. However, conventional method was to provide a communication infrastructure by floating large aircraft as UAV or hot-air balloon in the high air. Therefore, it was difficult to utilize previous method because it requires a lot of time and cost. But it is possible to save money and time by using a drone which is already used in many areas as a small UAV. In this paper, we design a drone that can provide wireless infrastructure using high speed Wi-Fi. After reaching the target area, the drone can provide Wi-Fi using wireless mesh network and transmit the situation of local area through attached camera. And the transmitted videos can be monitored in the control center or cell phone through application in real time. The proposed scheme provides wireless communication of up to 160 Mbps in a coverage of about 200 m and video transmission with a coverage of about 120 m, respectively."
P.S.
I'm sure many will find it suspicious that one person has (possibly) seen UAPs three times. I've been driving from SoCal to Las Vegas for 34 years almost continuously. I generally drive in the middle of the night; the traffic backup is so bad, if you drive during the daytime, it's not unusual to blow twelve hours making that trip. Do it at midnight and you can get to Vegas by 5am, missing all the traffic. So I've spent MANY a late night driving in the middle of the desert at 3am. For 30 years, I never saw ANYTHING unusual, and then these weird sightings began to happen to me, about once every two years or so.
Almost every night in SoCal, the cool air rolls in from the ocean, caused by the temperature differential between the cool air above the Pacific Ocean, and the warm air about Southern California. This leads to overcast skies. Not clouds, just a big ol' blanket of fog, and a lot of humidity.
The light generated on the land is reflected off of the overcast skies, and it causes the sky too like quite bright, even at 10pm or 11pm at night.
Hold that thought...
The city of San Diego is ringed by military bases. There's Camp Pendleton to the north of Carlsbad, and a big chunk of downtown San Diego is basically a sprawling military base. Miramar (from the Top Gun movies) is located Northeeast of downtown San Diego. The San Diego airport is bracketed by the former SPAWAR facilities just north of the airport, along with former SPAWAR facilities out on Point Loma, west of the airport.
Due to the crazy amount of military bases, you just get accustomed to crazy military stuff flying overhead. It's like you just 'tune it out' after a while. There is nearly always something crazy flying overhead. (When I say "crazy" I don't mean black triangles. I mean things like an Osprey; I never saw one in my life until I moved to San Diego, then when I moved I started seeing them every week. There is ALWAYS something flying over your house if you live in San Diego. You just get used to it.)
The attached pic is not my house, but that's what the sky in San Diego looks like on a lot of nights. Grey and overcast.
One night, I was in my backyard. Although the sky was grey, there was a big chunk of the sky that was just blacker than the blackest black that you've ever seen. And it was a triangular shape.
In the second pic, I made an attempt to provide a visual of what the sky looked like that night.
In the movies, they always make UAPs appear to be absolutely astonishing or mind bending or frightening... but I didn't feel any of those emotions at all.
This will sound macabre, but the closest thing to describe how I felt, was when I once saw a fatal motorcycle accident that had just occurred on the freeway. Basically I was driving on the freeway, and traffic came to a screeching halt. Cars began to file into a single lane, to pass a motorcycle that had just crashed. I drove past what I assume (in hindsight) was a fatality. But my brain simply could not process it. It was no more than three feet away from my car, and I could see it as clear as day, but I just couldn't "compute" what I was seeing because I had never seen it before. This will sound absolutely ridiculous, but when I saw it, my brain jumped to "Why is there a styrofoam head on the asphalt over there?" If you put me on a lie detector test an hour later, and asked me to explain what I saw, I would have earnestly stated "I saw a styrofoam head laying on the freeway today and I don't know how it got there." I think our brains are wired in such a way that we try and rationalize the things we see, that are beyond what we can understand. (Obviously, that wasn't a mannequin, the motorcyclist had lost his life in an extremely violent way. But my brain could not compute what I was seeing.)
A couple of years later, I saw three lights doing weird things above Area 51, as I was driving in the desert at one of the highest points in elevation. That was downright serene, it was just like "hey that's neat." Wasn't scary, it was just a curiosity.
The same year, I saw something flying over March Air Force Base that was far more bizarre than either of these sightings. The one over March Air Force was almost completely inexplicable. It looked like some type of craft that was about the size of a 747 and it was doing something like figure eights in the air above the base. It was lit up like a Christmas tree; around a hundred lights that were uniform in color, a red that had a bit of orange in it. As with all the others, this was late at night. The most logical explanation is that it was a swarm of remote controlled drones. IE, the size of the 'swarm' was about as big as a 747, but I could not discern if the lights were independent objects, or if the lights were attached to a craft that was obscured by the light pollution produced by said lights. I refuse to call them 'orbs' like everyone in New Jersey is describing, because I was completely unable to discern if they were independent objects. The lights moved in perfect lockstep, which would indicate that they were either communicating with each other and following an identical flight path, or they were physically attached to something which was not visible. (I'm not sayin the craft was "invisible." I am saying that if a craft is black enough, it will disappear into the night sky and all you'll see are the lights. The Triangle in San Diego was visible BECAUSE of the fog. If it was a clear and cloudless night, I would have had absolutely no idea at all that it was there, because it was as black as black gets.)
This video is somewhat similar to what I saw, except the colors were orange-red, they flew in a repeating figure eight, and they were in perfect lockstep:
https://www.pond5.com/stock-footage/item/93681571-autonomous-drone-swarm-4k
Before anyone says "it's ALIENS," keep in mind there are a ton of unclassified articles that describe drone swarms. For instance, the US Navy has programs where they can set up wireless networks in the air using drones. Basically:
1) imagine the wifi network at an airport or office building. Hundreds or even thousands of wireless access points that communicate with each other to create a wireless mesh network.
2) Now put those wireless devices on a drone, and put the wireless network in the sky. Very useful in warfare; your team no longer has to rely on satellites for communication exclusively, it can bring a wireless network wherever it goes. Combine this with GPS and cameras and you have one heck of a surveillance system. Imagine being able to bring the wireless camera network that people have in their houses, put it up in the sky, and then multiply the size by a hundred.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=84039
"In recent years, researches of disseminating wireless network have been conducted for areas without network infrastructure such as disaster situation or military disputes. However, conventional method was to provide a communication infrastructure by floating large aircraft as UAV or hot-air balloon in the high air. Therefore, it was difficult to utilize previous method because it requires a lot of time and cost. But it is possible to save money and time by using a drone which is already used in many areas as a small UAV. In this paper, we design a drone that can provide wireless infrastructure using high speed Wi-Fi. After reaching the target area, the drone can provide Wi-Fi using wireless mesh network and transmit the situation of local area through attached camera. And the transmitted videos can be monitored in the control center or cell phone through application in real time. The proposed scheme provides wireless communication of up to 160 Mbps in a coverage of about 200 m and video transmission with a coverage of about 120 m, respectively."
P.S.
I'm sure many will find it suspicious that one person has (possibly) seen UAPs three times. I've been driving from SoCal to Las Vegas for 34 years almost continuously. I generally drive in the middle of the night; the traffic backup is so bad, if you drive during the daytime, it's not unusual to blow twelve hours making that trip. Do it at midnight and you can get to Vegas by 5am, missing all the traffic. So I've spent MANY a late night driving in the middle of the desert at 3am. For 30 years, I never saw ANYTHING unusual, and then these weird sightings began to happen to me, about once every two years or so.
Attachments
Last edited:
The Navy patent holder Dr. Salvatore Pais has done a couple interviews. I think this was the first one:
Wikipedia has an article about Pais, I haven’t read all of this thread’s last 6 pages so not sure if this has already been said, but the guys output fails the most basic due diligence check:
Starting in 2015, he began filing patent applications on behalf of his employers with futuristic-sounding names suggesting potential military and energy-producing applications. No working prototype of any of these concepts was ever developed. These attracted attention, as well as speculation that they may be disinformation intended to mislead the United States' strategic adversaries about the direction of United States defense research.
Here’s my favorite. A, so-called, space-time modification weapon. I don’t know WTF that is, but it sure sounds cool. Suicidal, but cool.
https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/t...vy-experiment-spacetime-weapon-hydrogen-bomb/
https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/t...vy-experiment-spacetime-weapon-hydrogen-bomb/
It all looks to be the basis for an exciting new audio cable offering...
😉
😉
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Gravitational Waveguides