• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

GB: for 2SK389 and 2SJ109

Status
Not open for further replies.
ppl with enough xperience in parts trading knows that fakes are everywhere .

I know that - , because I make my living from repairs almost two decades .

and 95% of parts which I bought (till 3-5 yrs ago) were from western vendors ;

in last 3-5 yrs , my local vendors finds a way to trade without western middleman , and situation regarding fakes is BETTER than before , even if imports are directly from east!

judging those things based on experience with few minor GB is :xeye:

if someone have doubts - ask Jaccovitty .......... chasing obsoletttties is his hobby , passion , whatever .
 
Please note that many of both the real and the fake are produced
in East Asia. Problem is that some of the worldwide suppliers are
not taking the real caerfully, or they have no ability to distinguish
them. Or, they just buy the fake for better profits.

Don't say Asian bad Western good. Are you all Western good . . . ?
Simply, I don't think so.

Your own falts some parts in GB, in my opinion.
diyAudio's own falts some parts in GB, in my opinion.

Sigh . . .


:darkside:
 
As these are actually devices as such, it appears to me that those which are not what they should be were removed from boards for just that reason. It seems that they then fell into the hands of someone who is crooked in the chain of people who have handled them prior to becoming available to the GB facilitator (who should have been perhaps more suspicious than he was). There again he may well have been shown a few samples of the real McCoy.
 
> Don't say Asian bad Western good.
> Simply, I don't think so.

Spot on.
Aren't we all trying to scout the world for remaining 2SK389#s and 2SJ109's ?
I would have thought that they were manufactured by a East Asian company in East Asia ??


Wishing you all Happy New Year.
Patrick
 
Hi,

Purely for the record, and as A'af requested this, my package of both types of devices ( J & K) arrived today.

I have checked them with a component analyser and both types are NPN dual bi-polars with HFE varying between 340 & 535.

Measuring the plastic packages with a micrometer, and inspecting them under a microscope, suggests to me that these are genuine Toshiba 'packaging', as it is not easy to *precisely* replicate such things with moulding flashes even being identical, for example.

Accordingly, my guess is that they are 're-marked' 2SC3381 'BL's for what this matters, but there is no clear evidence that any original lettering has been erased. Fakes I have seen in the past have not been so carefully replicated as these, and it is usually immediately obvious with even a casual inspection with just the naked eye.

The state of the leads is a puzzle, as several of mine are full length (compared with known genuine types), and if they had been soldered in a circuit board normally and the excess protruding lead cropped from under the PCB during production, some reduction in length would be obvious here.
Others have very irregular leads both in shape and length, and all have been liberally coated with solder, unlike 'fresh' Toshiba devices of this type.

I hope that this might help A'af when he is in contact with his suppliers, and await the outcome after 5th Jan.

Although it would have been wiser not to have distributed these devices after realising that the leads were suspect ("ugly pin"), I personally don't believe that A'af was a witting party to a scam in this case. He does apparently have a good reputation over several years as a supplier of similar parts, and if he simply wished to rip everyone off, why go to the trouble which he has in sending out all these parts to us, knowing that before long the truth would come out, anyway? He could have saved himself a lot of work, avoided obtaining any devices and international postage costs etc., and simply disappeared.

Regrettably, it is hard to see a truly happy ending for everyone involved here, and especially for A'af, but in spite of this I wish all Forum Members a Happy New Year.

Regards,
 
IF all parts are like mine, then these continued statements about mislabeled parts can be stopped now. It's a simple matter of math. Mine show a current of 200mA at 5 V - what power dissipation do you get?

1 W.

How much is the maximum power dissipation of that package?

0.2 W.

Anybody remember a previous posting of someone with an exploded part? Is now clear why?

Anyway, how would you want to use such a part? Use it with a U_DS below 1 V? In the not-saturated region?

By the way, the 2SC3381 has a collector current of max 100mA.

All the best, Hannes

They just are not dual-JFETs but dual-transistors (maybe someone could test his parts to really verify this). This and because both types have the same housing, the idea that a batch of them has simply been mixed up before labeling is not too far off IMO.
 
I could buy the thought that *maybe* they were labelled wrong by accident. But it seems most unlikely to me, that the same transistor would be split in two parts, again by accident, and the one part being labelled 2sj109, and the other part 2sk38.
In my mind there is no doubt that it's a fraud, problem is just to find out where, or by whom they were sold. If A'af's supplier is a weel known one, he will take responsibility and refund them to A'af. If not....... Well, i haven't thougt that through.

Anyway, happy new year everyone, i'm out of the house now, won't be back before next year 😀
 
Please be reminded that the pinout of the dual JFET (2SK389) and dual BJT (2SC3381) are different, please see the attached pinout diagram for the 2SC3381. If you test the faked parts as a K389 for IDSS surely you would get uncontrolled current as you are actually measuring the forward current of a diode!

If you test them as 2SC3381 you do get sensible outcome (like NPN configuration, hfe 250~550), reflecting these parts are functional as NPN BJT (but not as JFET). I think by now no one would disagree that these parts were all faked, all were tinned, and at least some seemed to be pulled from circuit boards.

I agree that A'af should be more cautious when he saw the outlook of the pins of these part. But that was history now, and testiing the parts do requires some knownledge in electronics.

I am actually thinking of what I would use these parts for (as 2SC3381) if I have to live with them, as otherwise it would be a total lost. Current mirror, current sink, LTP for power supply regulator are some of my ideas. But I keep wanting the complement part (2SA1349) for full complementary topology.

Happy new year,
Edward Tam


h_a said:
IF all parts are like mine, then these continued statements about mislabeled parts can be stopped now. It's a simple matter of math. Mine show a current of 200mA at 5 V - what power dissipation do you get?

1 W.

How much is the maximum power dissipation of that package?

0.2 W.

Anybody remember a previous posting of someone with an exploded part? Is now clear why?

Anyway, how would you want to use such a part? Use it with a U_DS below 1 V? In the not-saturated region?

By the way, the 2SC3381 has a collector current of max 100mA.

All the best, Hannes

 

Attachments

  • c3381.jpg
    c3381.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 790
kf_tam said:
If you test them as 2SC3381 you do get sensible outcome (like NPN configuration, hfe 250~550), reflecting these parts are functional as NPN BJT (but not as JFET). I think by now no one would disagree that these parts were all faked, all were tinned, and at least some seemed to be pulled from circuit boards.

Hi,

Although it is academic since none of us wanted nor paid for dual bi-polars, I couldn't agree more with this comment and it reflects exactly what I found and mentioned in my earlier post. I used a component analyser which immediately indicates on a readout what the connected device actually is, which pins are which, and gain etc., and as it doesn't matter which way the DUT is connected to this tester, there cannot be any mistakes.

I presently don't feel inclined to waste any more time to check any other parameters like collector currents which have been stated to be unusual, but in view of the accuracy of the packaging compared with genuine Toshiba devices, and the close matching from one side to the other of those I already checked, I still think that they are *most likely* to be 're-marked' 2SC3381s.

No fakes I have ever seen before have been so well and carefully replicated in all material ways like these have, and if you ever check the individual gains of any batch of small signal bi-polars, the chances of getting such close matches between any 2 single randomly chosen transistors as I measured earlier on these dual BJTs, is just about zero.

Therefore, unless these were originally made as 'duals', the "fakers" must have gone to great lengths to match each single device in pairs before re-packaging them in this format, which does not seem very likely to me.

I am sure that we are all similarly disappointed and upset by what has happened here, but I still feel that A'af has been duped by his suppliers and that he must be given the opportunity to take this up with those people. Hopefully, the feedback which he now has from posters will help in this respect, and I will await the outcome of these discussions.

Something untoward has clearly happened with these devices (I still think) before they were supplied to A'af, and this should be resolved by him and whoever his suppliers are. If my beliefs here are correct, this could have happened to almost anyone who is genuinely trying to help others with a GB, but it would have been more sensible if on seeing the "ugly pins" he mentioned, A'af had taken this matter further before distributing these transistors all around the world.

Regards,
 
Whatever they are they aren't 2sk389 so why are we agonizing over what else they might be - A'f or his supplier's got screwed and will we see a refund is likely the only question worth agonizing over. The way the group buy was run with the shipping delays and the time to ship them put us out of the PayPal coverage period . . We can likely forget about ever seeing 2sk389's of any gain group.
 
ticknpop said:
Whatever they are they aren't 2sk389 so why are we agonizing over what else they might be - A'f or his supplier's got screwed and will we see a refund is likely the only question worth agonizing over. The way the group buy was run with the shipping delays and the time to ship them put us out of the PayPal coverage period . . We can likely forget about ever seeing 2sk389's of any gain group.

Hi,

I, for one, am not "agonising" over anything if you are referring to my comments.

As with kf_tam and some others, I have merely tried to provide some unemotional and factual information relating to the devices which I only received today, in the hope that it might be of some help to A'af when he talks to his suppliers, and to let others know what they have most likely ended-up with in this GB.

Also, I believe in being fair to others and giving anyone a chance in life when something as unusual as this happens. Unlike the earlier 'reference' to another GB which went wrong and nothing was ever apparently sent to participants in this other GB, A'af went to a lot of trouble in sending out these parts, and other members had already said in this thread that he was a trustworthy supplier of these kinds of parts, and had been so for some years.

We must all have realised that some risk was attached in a GB for these parts which are known to be 'as rare as hen's teeth', but because this was a 'once in a lifetime opportunity' we put our faith in an apparently-respected source. It is still my belief that A'af was not aware that these devices were obvious fakes, and rather unwisely he distributed them, but in good faith, in my opinion.
If my beliefs are correct, and only time will tell, I feel some sympathy for A'af as he has got himself into an invidious position, quite accidentally, and there is no likelihood that this can be resolved amicably for everyone concerned.

I am not suggesting that this applies to you, but to suddenly forget all the earlier cries of "what a great person A'af is" which were rife in this thread until this very unfortunate mishap occurred, is not in the spirit of fairness or being reasonable in my book, and he deserves the chance to put matters right before being condemned by anyone.

I trust that this makes my feelings on the matter quite clear, but I am not any more happy about this unsatisfactory position which we are all in, than anyone else.

Regards.
 
Before we go further into politics in passing the blame for what has happened here on communists, Asians, Africans, nazis, Jews, KKK, mafia, Belzebub, aliens or whatnot, it might help to remember that A'af has been a member since 2001. He has devoted his past 6 years here almost exclusively to selling electronic parts. He apparently did so well in earning people's trust that most members considered him to be a legitimate DIYAUDIO SELLER. He has also donated to diyaudio.com and as such was granted a special title (Audio Aficionados) by the management of this site to distinguish him from "ordinary" members. Many people here, me included, were led by these facts when they were making their decision to purchase the parts in question from A'af. We are not the victims of just another crook from the Far East as it has been implied here. We are talking about A'af - a successful and trusted diyaudio seller and donator. All this makes it a diyaudio problem too so please refrain from global politics. Gloating does not help either.

Happy New Year!

Regards,
Milan
 
As you well know, anyone who donates, amateur, friend, foe, vendor, hobbyist, butcher, baker, or candlestick maker, is entitled to a custom title. I've even got one. Why would you read anything special into that? If that's what gives someone credibility in your mind, I don't pretend to understand what you're thinking.

Looking back, I'd agree on the track record, though, and if I were involved in this, that might give me some hope. Just sayin', I don't know anything that anyone else doesn't know- these aren't tubes, so are of much less interest to me.😉
 
AudioFreak said:
The ex-soviet block and east asia do indeed seem to be the worst areas for fake semiconductors but I have encountered them in the retail channels in both Australia and USA.

I'm from the far east, have lived abroad in 3 different continents and I believe where ever human is involved the possibility of getting duped by another human is always possible...if you watch Discovery or National Geo channel you'll find out the animal world has their version too.
 
What is the problem? These parts are apparently RE-LABELED Toshiba devices that are actually bipolar transistors. There are only a FEW parts made with this PACKAGE. One is a pair of bipolar transistors. Someone, somewhere, got parts from old circuit boards that LOOKED like Toshiba dual fets and RELABELED THEM. This has been proven by measurement. This is what I was first concerned about, WHEN such a SELECTION of devices was offered, by the distributor. It is easy to change a label.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.