Freq measurements and Hypex Filter Design adjustments

[AllenB]

Fedde, maybe you are suggesting the new response can be measured and re-converted back to passive for a self contained result that sounds the same as this. Good idea.

 

[Steve2111]

And 6 DACs. Worth the effort or cost? Well, if it sounds better...

Yes and 6 DACs
In the end was worth it
Next time with my cheaper speakers I will try MiniDSP. But I have to find 6 amps or 6 Channel amp?

 

[Steve2111]

I'm just starting and was able to do some measurements in HFD but did not find a way to combine near- and farfield measurements. There is a possibility to import measurements, did you look at that?
What I found usefull in HFD (4.9) is the possibility to set a flat frequency response. This way you can visualize different filters, Q factors etc.

Hi
I've just revisited this forum and came across your post. To set a flat frequency response in HFD 4.9 is very interesting. I have not found this in HFD???
What I will do when I have time is use REW to give me the "flattening" filters with their Q values, which I suppose I then manually feed into HFD.
I have not done any measurements with HFD, only ARTA. Maybe better in HFD?

 

[AlmaAtaKZ]

Hypex FA doesn't work directly, you must load settings every time, even better to reset to verify the changes. Only muting seems to have direct effect. I have used FA123.

Un/Muting, EQ de/activation, preset selection and volume level have direct effect (from the Filter Design window) as far as I now. Filters and different EQ settings need uploading to the connected unit.