I see that the new Jones-Scanlon Baby Reds (approx $4400 USD, per pair) are based om PTT6.5 together with tweeter Faital Pro FD371.
Would Harsch XO be applicable to the FD371?
RAAL is seriously very good.
We used them (AG-version) in our "Bendit" Project.
Why is 4th order for RAAL compulsory ? (4th order is a recommendation for 1600 hz). I guess you are aiming for low xo avoiding beaming from PTT?
I am getting an extra set of baffles made for the PTT6.5 TL to allow mounting of a RAAL 70-20xr ribbon. It should be a simple LR4 XO with the RAAL in reverse polarity.
Attachments
The RAAL 70-20xr is supposed to be able to go down to 1600Hz according to factory data sheet. I agree a WG would be the cat’s meow but would require me to design one and 3D print it. I have made a foam core tractrix for it and had some issues with cancellation dips due to the sharp 90deg sidewalls. I suspect a shallow angle WG would be less likely to have those problems.
Nano-Trynergy - a Compact Tractrix RAAL Ribbon Point-Source Horn
Here is a quick attempt at 3 way with parallel sealed RS225-8 woofers and dual (highly attenuated) 3FE22-8 mids at injection ports.
Nano-Trynergy - a Compact Tractrix RAAL Ribbon Point-Source Horn
Here is a quick attempt at 3 way with parallel sealed RS225-8 woofers and dual (highly attenuated) 3FE22-8 mids at injection ports.
Last edited:
Yeah RAALs claims are more than a bit optimistic. The tweeter might not suffer damage when used that low but HD rises rapidly below 3k especially the high orders.
Measurements are here
RAAL 70-20XR | HiFiCompass
Note that this is even with a 4th order at 2k in place. They definitely can't be used down to 1.6k unless you like listening to distortion or only listen very quietly. I'm sure things look a lot better if they are only producing 70-80dB.
Measurements are here
RAAL 70-20XR | HiFiCompass
Note that this is even with a 4th order at 2k in place. They definitely can't be used down to 1.6k unless you like listening to distortion or only listen very quietly. I'm sure things look a lot better if they are only producing 70-80dB.
Hi jmpsmash;
I mean no disrespect but seeing the cable routed in through the port made me laugh my head off! That is a very practical approach.
Cheers
Matt
I mean no disrespect but seeing the cable routed in through the port made me laugh my head off! That is a very practical approach.
Cheers
Matt
6.5 cu ft. it takes up quite a bit of space!
I am not sure EQ’ng the PTT6.5 to get stuff above 3.5k makes sense. It’s a midwoofer. I would consider pairing it with a Scanspeak 10F. That might be very nice sounding. Cross around 1kHz.
I would think your TL cabinet would work well upside down with the 10F in an exposed penta-dagger above the Purifi, using your 1st order crossover. Would the driver centers be too far apart?
Skip
Hi jmpsmash;
I mean no disrespect but seeing the cable routed in through the port made me laugh my head off! That is a very practical approach.
Cheers
Matt
It is work in progress... for the past 10 months.
I tried crossing at 80Hz and then 120Hz. 120Hz has more grunt to the bass.
Can I ask what the filter slopes were.
That’s 3/4in BB plywood on exterior panels and 1/2in BB on interior walls. The templates for routing the holes was made of MDF - so that may have caused some confusion. I have a super experienced cabinet maker doing these for me as I don’t have a wood shop nor the skills to make fine joints like this. He tells me they will be delivered tomorrow in the PM. I will still need to install final stuffing, crossovers, and general buttoning up. Will be using square drive socket cap screws to secure the baffle. Should look great.
Here is a template:
Here is a template:
Last edited:
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Exploring Purifi Woofer Speaker Builds