Explendid amplifier designed by Michael Bittner, our MikeB

Good to know that you believe that this is not a Myth.

So...i will be more carefull when next testing were done, i will search for better cables too.

I was thinking this as a Myth, as i have tested many years ago, without something very different in sonics.

But as Pavel and you Michael, both respectable guys are telling this, i will reduce myself to my insignificance and i will try to listen what you are perceiving.

thanks.

Everyday learning something...this is good.... can be better than the shame of my own ignorance.

regards,

Carlos
 
Hi all.
Congratulations MikeB. It is great amp. J have build 5.3 version in oryginal and version with two pairs output devices (supply +/-45V, bias 150mA, mpsa18 replaced by mps42). Sound is just like just to say my predecessors who build this amp - great!

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
 
Hi MikeB. Yes I'm borysgo2. (http://pszyszka.googlepages.com/)
I am waiting for silver mica's for two weeks and can't wait to collect them. Benefits, hmm, maybe higher output power and posibility to use low spl speakers, that is all I think.
One chaneel I build using only mpsa (92/42), the other one just like in 5,3 project except mps18 (I used mpsa42). I'm not sure but this with mpsa only sounds better. I must listen to it a bit longer. Maybe this is result of higher harmonic distortion level. I'll try to measure it in spectralab.
 
MikeB
My Engilsh isn't good enough, but I'll try.
Sound is little bit brighter and has a more of detail, specially on the bacground.
I suppose that this could be result of more harmonic distortion (2,4,6,...). If measurments do not confirm this, it will mean that mpsa realy improve the sound.

My friend have made a measurments (with souncard), amp was made with mpsa. He sed that this meas. was only to check how the program works, so it could be nothing important.

http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=19v5r1khzpe7.png
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=19v5r1khzpe7.png

Load 5R, output amplitude 19V.
 
Hi Pavel, yes, it shouldn't hurt, no ringing visible... The output devices do look like Toshibas !

Borys, something is wrong with the measuring, symasym normally does not produce these levels of 7th harmonic, but might be caused by soundcard. The even harmonics are "normal", it's caused likely by pcb layout. Brighter sound is mostly an indicator for increased distortions.

I attached one of Pavels measurings.

Mike
 

Attachments

  • sym5_44w_4o_1k_.gif
    sym5_44w_4o_1k_.gif
    35.8 KB · Views: 726
I mean VAS and driver stage, all whitout output devices, sory (ups).
Now is all clear. As I supposed, that is result harmonic distortion. Level of the harmonic in this print screans is not important becouse I have cheap soundcard.
As input I have temporary 2x47k.


An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
 
borys said:
I mean VAS and driver stage, all whitout output devices, sory (ups).
Now is all clear. As I supposed, that is result harmonic distortion. Level of the harmonic in this print screans is not important becouse I have cheap soundcard.
As input I have temporary 2x47k.

It's hard to read, but it looks like version with mpsa42/92 has 20db higher distortion (factor 10). This might prove 2n5551/5401 as very suitable audio transistor. I guess that mpsa42 is also bad choice here as input transistor.

You mean sum of vas and driver stage ? On my symasym-page at the bottom is a chart of currents, you can use that as guide. It matches quite good real world measurings.

"Cheap soundcard"... You meant very cheap ? Onboard sound ? 😉 It has ~30db higher distortion than symasym... :bigeyes:

What do you mean with input you have 2x47k ?

Mike