I tried from the wav, now I am entering your settings and do it again.
Is the gain dynamic matched bit by bit? because I don't want to do this, the files are already gain matched and it would screw up completely the dynamic element that I want to analyze any deviation from gain.
Is the gain dynamic matched bit by bit? because I don't want to do this, the files are already gain matched and it would screw up completely the dynamic element that I want to analyze any deviation from gain.
With your new files I get same results as earlier in post #46. Computer DAC is closer to the original.
ok I looked closely,
you don't have the same version, maybe if you reinstall a new fresh version 2.0.17 we could get the same results.
you don't have the same version, maybe if you reinstall a new fresh version 2.0.17 we could get the same results.
I already noticed that but results are more or less the same with the new version as well. The difference comes from you not setting the "Match gain" option. Without it results will be way off if recordings have different gain.maybe if you reinstall a new fresh version 2.0.17 we could get the same results.
I was not clicking on 'match' I was clicking on preview.... FOUND IT
I still think the tube is better, on the frequency that matter it has a 2-3 db better match , it is from 4khz and up that it has a poorer performance, not important frequencies for me.
This is the type of test they should do on dacs in the review forums.
I am just using a very bad/basic setup and it is quite informative!
in reality the matching must be way better because I require to lower the digital volume to 40% or less in order not to clip the microphone input, even when I used the middle adaptor and not the barrel one (which lowers the sensitivity of the ADC)
I still think the tube is better, on the frequency that matter it has a 2-3 db better match , it is from 4khz and up that it has a poorer performance, not important frequencies for me.
This is the type of test they should do on dacs in the review forums.
I am just using a very bad/basic setup and it is quite informative!
in reality the matching must be way better because I require to lower the digital volume to 40% or less in order not to clip the microphone input, even when I used the middle adaptor and not the barrel one (which lowers the sensitivity of the ADC)
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Line Level
- E-MU 0404 AK4396 to Broskie Unbalancer Audible differences?