+1. I'm hoping to implement RIAA with my Nadja to compare to an analogue RIAA. Other things to look into first though...
🙂
The option to include input processing on the output data is great. When I enabled this option I expected to "see" what I have been measuring. However, the impact of the analog gains is missing (I understand why). I forgot that I increased the overall analog gain while online. I would like to emphasize the need to make the entire gain structure "visible" offline.
The option to include input processing on the output data is great. When I enabled this option I expected to "see" what I have been measuring. However, the impact of the analog gains is missing (I understand why). I forgot that I increased the overall analog gain while online. I would like to emphasize the need to make the entire gain structure "visible" offline.
I was hoping for the possibility of pairing as "Ryssen" described, is that going to be an option or is the 1/5-2/6-3/7.......the only option planned ?
Why do you need to pair 1 and 2 (and so forth) rather than 1 and 5? Doesn't it make more sense to pair 1 and 5 in order for the processing load to always be perfectly distributed between the cores? After all the only difference is where you plug in your cable.
It would be easyer if like me going to use my own DAC´s,well a little easier to keep it all togethet on the opamp sockels..
Urban is right: the selected pairing is the most natural for the device architecture: it helps balancing the load between both cores.
Also, when you're using the onboard DACs, you'd want to keep one quadruple RCA for one speaker and the other quadruple RCA for the other speaker. It kind of makes sense, and the selected pairing is in line with that logic.
When you use your own DACs, then you're free to route the signals at your will to the expansion port (Menu Settings -> Expansion Port 0 routing). In other terms, nothing prevents you from having two paired channels on the same I2S line if this is what you want.
Also, when you're using the onboard DACs, you'd want to keep one quadruple RCA for one speaker and the other quadruple RCA for the other speaker. It kind of makes sense, and the selected pairing is in line with that logic.
When you use your own DACs, then you're free to route the signals at your will to the expansion port (Menu Settings -> Expansion Port 0 routing). In other terms, nothing prevents you from having two paired channels on the same I2S line if this is what you want.
Yes your right just desolder/resolder a couple of cabels.
to have them balanced between the cores.
to have them balanced between the cores.
Ake: I don't know how you have connected your DACs, I can't be behind your back 🙂
If your DACs are connected on the I2S expansion port, then I think you should be able to route the signals such a way that you benefit from pairing without the need to change your hardware.
I'm more than happy to help, but I need more details: what channels are you using, how are your DACs connected etc.
Best,
Nick
If your DACs are connected on the I2S expansion port, then I think you should be able to route the signals such a way that you benefit from pairing without the need to change your hardware.
I'm more than happy to help, but I need more details: what channels are you using, how are your DACs connected etc.
Best,
Nick
No I´m using the analog input of the opams(to be anle to use the analog voulme control)
And I have mono sub so theres 5 cables to the IC sockel,so I only have to move 1 Opamp holder and desolder/resolder I cable (the mono sub) to get it right,no problem. 🙂
I haven´t tested the filter in my rig yet,will do it soon now that the new software is out. 🙂
And I have mono sub so theres 5 cables to the IC sockel,so I only have to move 1 Opamp holder and desolder/resolder I cable (the mono sub) to get it right,no problem. 🙂
I haven´t tested the filter in my rig yet,will do it soon now that the new software is out. 🙂
I'm using spdif output since I don't belive in 30cm long I2s cables and those output are fixed as the pairs I described. If there is no plan to make these
kinds of pairs available, just say so and I will live that.
kinds of pairs available, just say so and I will live that.
One problem is when I want one of the 2 paired channels to be Right and one left,both turn to the same..or how do I fix that?
Edit:And if I do all the settings on this beta firmware,can they be used when the sharp verision comes,or do I have to do them all again?
Edit:And if I do all the settings on this beta firmware,can they be used when the sharp verision comes,or do I have to do them all again?
Last edited:
That would appear to be a bug as I can't really see why you would link two channels to the same side as I understood the pairing would be to make identical adjustment to both left and right channels at the same time.
Un-pair the channels, change your routing to what you want, then pair again.
This release is a beta version, it's not tested.
That worked.
Just remembered,my DAC´s are 2 different Spdif dacs,so I have to have the signal (Spdif) 1-2 and 3-4 and 5.
I guess that´s not possible with pairing then?
Did some beta testing.
Before, I had 42/41 % core usage on a three way 96khz
with a few eq's.
After, with the same project loaded it went to 47/42.
After dissabling channel 1-2 and channel 9-10 that
are not in use it went down to 37-38.
So far so god, but I now have indication of bass clipping
even if all channels are dissabled (inputs as well).
It indicates no clipping at the monitor meters.
Edit: The preset renaming function is of as well.
Edit2: If you want to save an old project under this beta version
save it as a new project otherwise it will not work with
the old Najda drivers. That way you could go back to the old
software/driver package without having to redo the project again.
Before, I had 42/41 % core usage on a three way 96khz
with a few eq's.
After, with the same project loaded it went to 47/42.
After dissabling channel 1-2 and channel 9-10 that
are not in use it went down to 37-38.
So far so god, but I now have indication of bass clipping
even if all channels are dissabled (inputs as well).
It indicates no clipping at the monitor meters.
Edit: The preset renaming function is of as well.
Edit2: If you want to save an old project under this beta version
save it as a new project otherwise it will not work with
the old Najda drivers. That way you could go back to the old
software/driver package without having to redo the project again.
Last edited: