Hi Beau, the depth is the same as the main board, width is 35 mm but I'm looking at making that less.
Thanks Pete for letting me know.
Yes there will be a possibility to stack the boards - but the primary assembling option will be to keep them side by side at same height level.
Nick, just so you don't get to many days of 😉 😱
How far of is "Najda Control Application for Mac"?
How far of is "Najda Control Application for Mac"?
Ehmm... 😀
Alright: The expansion board is in the pipeline, the soft/firm revision is as well. Unfortunately there's no plan regarding the MacOS build (basically, there's not much demand)
Nick, any chance you could give us a wish list summary and an indication of how you have prioritised the items?
A small wish- What would make this a fully featured board( in my eyes ) is if the firmware could control the expansionport so that a digital select (fex over SPI) , 1 of 8 fex could be implemented. The purpose would of course to select audio input, stereo.
I can cope even if there is just a MS software but I'm using Mac
for music playback. Hmmmm, I would still like not having to plug
in the laptop just for doing some settings, please 😉
Hum, I just found something in the current software revision that is, at least for me, very annoying.
When you import a curve, let's say in output graph, the level is automatically normalized to 0 dB at 1 kHz. It seems that you can't adjust anything here.
So let's say you import a subwoofer response, it is not uncommon to be at -20 or -30 dB at 1 kHz... you can guess what the response looks
I would like be able either to be able to offset the all response or to choose the frequency at which the curve is normalized...
Jean Claude
When you import a curve, let's say in output graph, the level is automatically normalized to 0 dB at 1 kHz. It seems that you can't adjust anything here.
So let's say you import a subwoofer response, it is not uncommon to be at -20 or -30 dB at 1 kHz... you can guess what the response looks
I would like be able either to be able to offset the all response or to choose the frequency at which the curve is normalized...
Jean Claude
In the mean time, an easy fix would be to add a box to tick (or untick) to disable the 1 kHz normalization
Jean Claude
Jean Claude
Hi Shaun,
Priorities are as follow:
- Manual
- Soft/Firm revision
- Expansion board (not fully depending on me)
One of my work colleagues is from Cape Town. He doesn't know you - we never know 😉 Seems like a pretty place to be!
Can you please develop? What application would you have in mind?
Hmmm... Alright I take good note - but don't promise anything at that stage.
Indeed, there's normalization taking place at 1 kHz. It makes especially sense when you're loading several curves on the same graph panel. I had already long debates with Shaun on this topic. In the meantime you can zoom in/out and drag the graph. We'll see what we can do.
Best,
Nick
Sorry, I can't follow you on that. Let's take another example:
you want to design the crossover for a 4 way loudspeaker, so you want to load the curves for the sub, low mid, high mid and high drivers. What will be the look on the same graph panel if you load the 4 curves normalized at 0 dB at 1 kHz. no use at all specially for the sub and the tweeter curves...
Jean Claude
The system is actually a bit smarter than that. Relative levels are maintained when you load several curves: the system will select one curve as the normalizing reference, and will move all curves relative to that reference. Give it a try and let me know if it doesn't make sense.
Best,
Nick
Nick, perhaps now's a good time to have a squiz at my app note and see if it may be of use here.
Yes, you are right indeed, but I still think that it is a pain not to have control on the overall level... Let me give you another example: It is important to be able to load several curves of the same driver in box at different angle to differentiate what you need to correct and what not to. As you can load only one curve per channel, I use other channels just to visualize them. I like this better than just averaging curves all together.
Jean Claude