^ "In this household we believe in the Standard Model of Physics". How many times have we seen that image?
Divert attention from my retort any way you like, Steve, but your reputation as a top physicist is oan a shoogly peg after that song entry!
Divert attention from my retort any way you like, Steve, but your reputation as a top physicist is oan a shoogly peg after that song entry!

Ah yes, I remember Steve telling us Einstein's field equations represented 10 dimensions.
Steve, String Theory and GR field equations are different! One is real, the other is er, smoke and mirrors
😉
Steve, String Theory and GR field equations are different! One is real, the other is er, smoke and mirrors
😉
I have never chickened out of answering a difficult question:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/apr/23/john-horton-conway-obituary
The Mathematicians will find the answers.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/apr/23/john-horton-conway-obituary
The Mathematicians will find the answers.
Last edited:
All theories in that area are up a creek without a paddle.theory of gravity
Who revisited Maxwell's equations? Those date from 1865. It took a good number of years for someone bothered - a rather unusual type of "scientist" as well.
Who revisited Maxwell's equations?
Oliver Heaviside?
Probably best known for the Heaviside Layer.
Last edited:
Lorentz also reformulated them into the present form AFAIKOliver Heaviside?
Lorentz
I read that Maxwell’s equations and the Lorentz force law together encompass all the laws of electricity and magnetism.
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshe..._Maxwells_Equations_and_Electromagnetic_Waves
Lorentz transformations can also be used to illustrate that the magnetic field B and electric field E are simply different aspects of the same force — the electromagnetic force, as a consequence of relative motion between electric charges and observers.
Our gravitational mathematicians will not find any answer: Because they do not adapt their incorrect equations to the observations, but the observation to their incorrect equations: see e.g. "Dark Matter"-).I have never chickened out of answering a difficult question:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/apr/23/john-horton-conway-obituary
The Mathematicians will find the answers.
This is not how science works;-)
So you would attribute universe to wear red jackets because parts of the universe wear red jackets;-?
;-)
;-)
Ohh, the well bespoken good ol' Far-T effect....
He will protect us from the plasmoid full of ionised hydrogen gas which is leaking from Uranus.
....
//
So you would attribute universe to wear red jackets...
I would certainly advise against the wearing of red shirts while exploring the universe!
Einstein revisited them.
Indeed: "Later application of Einstein’s theory of relativity to Maxwell’s theory showed that electric and magnetic forces are not separate but are different manifestations of the same thing - the electromagnetic force."
"Oliver Heaviside's contribution was to greatly simplify Maxwell's 20 equations in 20 variables, replacing them by four equations in two variables. Today we call these 'Maxwell's equations' forgetting that they are in fact 'Heaviside's equations'."
Attachments
I atempted to explain the link between relativity and electromagnetism by way of Lorentz contraction back on page 62.
There's a full explanation, including frames of reference, here: https://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/rel_el_mag.html
"We are forced to the conclusion that whether a particular force on an actual particle is magnetic or electric, or some mixture of both, depends on the frame of reference - so the distinction is rather artificial."
There's a full explanation, including frames of reference, here: https://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/rel_el_mag.html
"We are forced to the conclusion that whether a particular force on an actual particle is magnetic or electric, or some mixture of both, depends on the frame of reference - so the distinction is rather artificial."
Last edited:
I have always been a good Physicist:
Some ability in Chemistry too:
But then I glimpsed something Rotten in Physics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239
Which has driven me back to Purer Mathematics:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/two-students-unravel-a-widely-believed-math-conjecture-20230810/
A much nicer problem:
And one I prefer. 🙂
Some ability in Chemistry too:
But then I glimpsed something Rotten in Physics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239
Which has driven me back to Purer Mathematics:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/two-students-unravel-a-widely-believed-math-conjecture-20230810/
A much nicer problem:
And one I prefer. 🙂
Last edited:
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Does this explain what generates gravity?