Click this for the scientific paper.
This is the Abstract:
Quark movement is almost by the speed of light. Due to this speed their inertial mass-effect increases profoundly. That inertial effect is an accelerating force. Within the nucleon the force is the strong force. As quarks movements are back and forth movements, called zigzag or oscillating movements, there is movement in opposite directions. So the oppositely acting forces annihilate each other. However the force acting on objects receding from each other is a trifle stronger than that acting on objects approaching each other. This small difference between these forces is a “left over” force and “leaks” out of the nucleon. In previous manuscripts, formulae were presented to calculate these forces. In the present paper the “left over”, “leaking” force is estimated, and this force is gravity.
This is the Abstract:
Quark movement is almost by the speed of light. Due to this speed their inertial mass-effect increases profoundly. That inertial effect is an accelerating force. Within the nucleon the force is the strong force. As quarks movements are back and forth movements, called zigzag or oscillating movements, there is movement in opposite directions. So the oppositely acting forces annihilate each other. However the force acting on objects receding from each other is a trifle stronger than that acting on objects approaching each other. This small difference between these forces is a “left over” force and “leaks” out of the nucleon. In previous manuscripts, formulae were presented to calculate these forces. In the present paper the “left over”, “leaking” force is estimated, and this force is gravity.
That paper has only been cited twice. It hasnt really set physics alight, despite the promise to solve fundamental conundrums. A good theory like general relativity yields multiple predictions with experimental outcomes. Theoretical physicists can be very creative but ...
Its worth contemplating we still have no idea of the actualities of the most basic constructs like time, space and gravity. Most of the matter in the universe is dark matter. What is dark matter. Unknown. Space is expanding. How does space expand? Unknown. Time is dependent on the speed of light. What is light. A wave? A particle. Both? Neither? Matter is energy. Nothing is solid. Nothing is as it seems.
Its worth contemplating we still have no idea of the actualities of the most basic constructs like time, space and gravity. Most of the matter in the universe is dark matter. What is dark matter. Unknown. Space is expanding. How does space expand? Unknown. Time is dependent on the speed of light. What is light. A wave? A particle. Both? Neither? Matter is energy. Nothing is solid. Nothing is as it seems.
It is thought that quarks trace tiny orbits inside a nucleon and so contribute to the magnetic moment of the nucleon.
This is analogous to the way that an electron orbiting a nucleus makes its own magnetic moment.
Our understanding of nucleons is still progressing through better experiments and theoretical calculations.
Such understanding can account for the electromagnetic force and the strong nuclear force, but, and not surprisingly, I can find no link with gravity in other scientific publications.
Well...this presentation tellls that the quarck's individual components mass is apparently higher than the quarck's mass itself...so it points to that leftover force adding to gravity theory.
Somehow the first article makes sense.The leaking gravity cooling down a hot universe is a good analogy to Hawking infrared radiation leaking out of black holes.
Somehow the first article makes sense.The leaking gravity cooling down a hot universe is a good analogy to Hawking infrared radiation leaking out of black holes.
Last edited by a moderator:
A link between gravity and other physics would be so interesting. We really don’t understand what gravity is (blah blah spacetime curvature blah blah). But if you can find a physical process that can generate a spin-2 boson, then it must be graviton as it’s unique (blah blah blah that’s a hypothetical particle blah blah).
There was some esoteric measurements with superconductors that always interested me, the work of Eugene Podkletnov. He showed some anonymous gravity-like affects from spinning superconductors. Nothing seemed to happen with this work, so I guess it was not real in the end. But, superconductivity results from Copper’s Pairs which are two Boson quasiparticles. It always made me think, that a decay channel for the Copper’s Pair might be a graviton for this reason.
There was some esoteric measurements with superconductors that always interested me, the work of Eugene Podkletnov. He showed some anonymous gravity-like affects from spinning superconductors. Nothing seemed to happen with this work, so I guess it was not real in the end. But, superconductivity results from Copper’s Pairs which are two Boson quasiparticles. It always made me think, that a decay channel for the Copper’s Pair might be a graviton for this reason.
What the presentation mentions is that a proton (a nucleon) occasionally appears to be a quantum mixture of the usual three quarks, but with a small amount of additional momentum which appears to come from another quark and antiquark - "colossal elementary particles that each outweigh the entire proton by more than one-third".
Oh that’s interesting. So this is something other than virtual particles, if it can be measured.
But, how can a proton contain particles more massive than itself?
Researchers have to be sure that when they detect a particle inside a proton, it is intrinsic to the proton itself and not being detected as a result of the aftermath of an energetic interaction.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/proton-contain-charm-quark/
There presently isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that the result is not a fluke, so it shouldn't be taken as a given that the proton is 'extra heavy'.
Researchers have to be sure that when they detect a particle inside a proton, it is intrinsic to the proton itself and not being detected as a result of the aftermath of an energetic interaction.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/proton-contain-charm-quark/
There presently isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that the result is not a fluke, so it shouldn't be taken as a given that the proton is 'extra heavy'.
Speed of light is a structural constant of the universe. Speed of gravity is another structural constant. They appear to work in fundamentally different ways -- yet they are the same constant.
Ether -- like air trapped in fiberous spongy loudspeaker stuffing -- transmitts structurally with frictional terminal velocity c. Embedded rest-mass, moving through it expresses part (v/c squared) of its potential as frictional heat-like kinetic energy, generated against a CSA with radius proportional to v/c. In the reference frame of a moving mass through ether, this friction mathematically foreshortens physical dimensions hence time dilation. Ether is indeed 4-dimensional elastic sheet geometry, as frictional compression action-reaction intermediates between the physical dimensions and time. The mass-energy of ether is dark in ordinary interactions. Universe expands as spongy ether is pushed apart in counter-reaction to the structural friction especially of light and gravity waves that permeate it (and more so as it expands). --Wm
Ether -- like air trapped in fiberous spongy loudspeaker stuffing -- transmitts structurally with frictional terminal velocity c. Embedded rest-mass, moving through it expresses part (v/c squared) of its potential as frictional heat-like kinetic energy, generated against a CSA with radius proportional to v/c. In the reference frame of a moving mass through ether, this friction mathematically foreshortens physical dimensions hence time dilation. Ether is indeed 4-dimensional elastic sheet geometry, as frictional compression action-reaction intermediates between the physical dimensions and time. The mass-energy of ether is dark in ordinary interactions. Universe expands as spongy ether is pushed apart in counter-reaction to the structural friction especially of light and gravity waves that permeate it (and more so as it expands). --Wm
Last edited: