do marketers lie to us too much?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Depending on what you're selling, where, and how, they're usually the most cost-effective type of advertising in existence.
Agreed. To some extent, it's like people just want to believe that companies simply throw money away or don't track the productivity of different channels through proper metrics. Bitching and moaning is much more effective, if not therapeutic. <my effort at sarcasm>

With that said... I empathize with many who are not pleased with targeted ads. However, I generally have no empathy for those that within the same breath will not pay to read an article or chat on a nice forum such as this.
Just because a few people wasted their money on mis-targeted ads because they were incompetent or not paying attention, they're notoriously poor?
All the above can be true, and sadly it's the bad actors that can ruin it for the rest. I'm sure there were a few honest lawyers and used-car salespeople, ya know? <one more try>

If this was a thread about engineering, we'd be calling engineers crooks because RCA jacks are only gold plated, not solid gold, and everyone would be wondering what ever happened to all of those free energy machines. The sheer richness and depth of misunderstanding here is incredible. I'm going to show myself out, nobody cares what really goes on in the marketing world anyway, we just want to whine about some crappy ad we saw once. 🤦‍♂️

It's a downer when people bash your profession.
 
It seems that everyone is going to the
subscription model.
I just saw this ad on Tv to remodel
Your bathroom tub to a walk-in shower
tub in one day. Only $99.00 dolars a month.
If you read the fine print, you pay for
180 months, $17820.00 Dollars For putting
a chunk of fiberglass in the smallest
room in your house with less than
8 hours labor.
 
It seems that everyone is going to the
subscription model.
I just saw this ad on Tv to remodel
Your bathroom tub to a walk-in shower
tub in one day. Only $99.00 dolars a month.
If you read the fine print, you pay for
180 months, $17820.00 Dollars For putting
a chunk of fiberglass in the smallest
room in your house with less than
8 hours labor.
I've seen those same ads all the time on tv here in Philadelphia.
Of course I think their nothing but garbage.
Besides.... I like a tub, once in a while to relax in.
 
It seems that everyone is going to the
subscription model.
I just saw this ad on Tv to remodel
Your bathroom tub to a walk-in shower
tub in one day. Only $99.00 dolars a month.
If you read the fine print, you pay for
180 months, $17820.00 Dollars For putting
a chunk of fiberglass in the smallest
room in your house with less than
8 hours labor.
That's just the old "rent to own" model. TV's, furnature, appliances etc.

jeff
 
I've seen those same ads all the time on tv here in Philadelphia.
At the MPLS airport now heading your way...

Love the used car ad... Glad I had headphones on and didn't have a mouthful of beer. 🙂

-------

On the line of 'subscriptions'. Personally, I don't lump 'rent-to-own' or absurd payment plans for bathroom remodels into 'subscriptions' per se. Related to car sales, there was a time when almost every customer was termed a 'payment buyer'. They (sometimes to their own detriment) never asked anything else about the financing of the vehicle other than, "What's my monthly payment?"

With subscriptions, in my general classification, which is probably not technically correct... the customer never winds up owning anything. It generally applies to services. More relevant to the conversation, yes, they do seem to be becoming more popular as companies attempt to diversify revenue streams and cut outdated models. As an example, I offer Software as a Service. I perfectly understand why companies do it, but for me, it's caused issues, and in the long-term, it always seems to cost more.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wiseoldtech
The sheer richness and depth of misunderstanding here is incredible.

You ought to be glad to see the perception of consumers that don't share your marketing professional's mindset. As an engineer I don't grouse about deficiencies in my designs; I address them.

The fact of the matter is that many people view marketing and its galling and tiresome cousin advertising as an annoying fact of life, like dandruff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wiseoldtech
@ItsAllInMyHead
Glad you enjoyed the used car ad, it's hilarious.
I like satire, sarcasm, and humor like that.
We need that these days to balance out and cope with the BS repeatedly tossed at us.

Regarding 'time payments' and financing, it's always been around, but most people don't 'look past their nose' into the future to see the reality/consequences of it all.
I'm of the type that buys things outright, to hell with having monthy installments and interest fees.

What people should do (in most cases) is to put aside money for future use like that.
But they don't, they spend spend spend...not my problem.
A good friend of mine is smart.... financially.... was able to buy a beautiful 2018 Honda Accord for $18K, loaded.... cash.
Paid off his mortgage years ago ahead of time too.
Has smart investments also.
Most people just don't think ahead like I said.
It's in part the results of the 'dumbing down of the people'.
 
@wg_ski

"It’s called a ’data center’ and they’re cropping up like weeds. This was about 6 years ago on my bike commute. There’s a whole row of them now - they installed a new substation just to handle the load."

Well, so much for the 'energy efficiency' blabbering, eh?
They'll push the public to use LED lighting, yet load down the grid with that garbage.
But then again, being two-faced and hypocritical seems to be all the rage these days.
The irony of someone posting this on a forum that is hosted in a data centre like that is not lost on me.

And if you could be bothered to do the wise thing and do some basic checking rather than just shooting off you would see that data centre power consumption is and has been a major concern for some years now. Some projections have 'the internet' which is a silly metric but basically all servers in data centres consuming up to 20% of the global electricity generation in a couple of years. Now the gold rush days are over electricity is the big ticket item in data centre costs so companies are spending a lot of time working out how to reduce that.

It also leads to great headlines to wind people up like the recent one where Nammo complained that they could expand their factory in Norway due to a Tiktok data centre using all the spare power. Tank shells or cat videos?
 
As promised, some interesting extracts from the NYT article hopefully a small enough %age to be considered fair use.

I've omitted the bits about how they work out the 20 or so items women in their second trimester all seem to buy and jump to when they realise they have hit jackpot in being able to accurately ascertain due date (I have read one report that claimed more accurately than the doctors but sack of salt needed there)

At which point someone asked an important question: How are women going to react when they figure out how much Target knows?

“If we send someone a catalog and say, ‘Congratulations on your first child!’ and they’ve never told us they’re pregnant, that’s going to make some people uncomfortable,” Pole told me. “We are very conservative about compliance with all privacy laws. But even if you’re following the law, you can do things where people get queasy.”

Big snip then he repeats himself

Using data to predict a woman’s pregnancy, Target realized soon after Pole perfected his model, could be a public-relations disaster. So the question became: how could they get their advertisements into expectant mothers’ hands without making it appear they were spying on them? How do you take advantage of someone’s habits without letting them know you’re studying their lives?

After Andrew Pole built his pregnancy-prediction model, after he identified thousands of female shoppers who were most likely pregnant, after someone pointed out that some of those women might be a little upset if they received an advertisement making it obvious Target was studying their reproductive status, everyone decided to slow things down.

The marketing department conducted a few tests by choosing a small, random sample of women from Pole’s list and mailing them combinations of advertisements to see how they reacted.

“We have the capacity to send every customer an ad booklet, specifically designed for them, that says, ‘Here’s everything you bought last week and a coupon for it,’ ” one Target executive told me. “We do that for grocery products all the time.” But for pregnant women, Target’s goal was selling them baby items they didn’t even know they needed yet.

“With the pregnancy products, though, we learned that some women react badly,” the executive said. “Then we started mixing in all these ads for things we knew pregnant women would never buy, so the baby ads looked random. We’d put an ad for a lawn mower next to diapers. We’d put a coupon for wineglasses next to infant clothes. That way, it looked like all the products were chosen by chance.

“And we found out that as long as a pregnant woman thinks she hasn’t been spied on, she’ll use the coupons. She just assumes that everyone else on her block got the same mailer for diapers and cribs. As long as we don’t spook her, it works.”

Clearly the article did not go down well with Target

When I approached Target to discuss Pole’s work, its representatives declined to speak with me. “Our mission is to make Target the preferred shopping destination for our guests by delivering outstanding value, continuous innovation and exceptional guest experience,” the company wrote in a statement. “We’ve developed a number of research tools that allow us to gain insights into trends and preferences within different demographic segments of our guest population.” When I sent Target a complete summary of my reporting, the reply was more terse: “Almost all of your statements contain inaccurate information and publishing them would be misleading to the public.

For context this article was written in 2012 talking about stuff that happened 2002/3 timeframe. There was also an interesting discussion on how febreze realised they had their marketing all wrong and fixed it, but that is for another time 🙂. But the historical interest, at least for me is that this is where the wider public first started to find out that their supermarket knows more about them than they do. From this was a short jump to the likes of facebook and google where you are now the product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vinylkid58
And for some light reading, hopefully not blocked abroad https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64801683 Not sure if many of those adverts were shown outside UK, but sure the levi's ones must have been. They made button flies cool again, which annoys me as I fumble with them. But some interesting and balanced comments from one of the old guard. Particularly resonant is "One of the most profound and fundamental things you can say about the value of a brand is that it is made by people who will never buy it." Bears thinking about.

Right I'm off to reminisce watching some flat Eric adverts from a simpler age of dial up modems and no facebook 😀
 
  • Like
Reactions: vinylkid58
I have to admit that some marketing is amusing, and relatable.

1682460170587.png
 
At the MPLS airport now heading your way...

Love the used car ad... Glad I had headphones on and didn't have a mouthful of beer. 🙂

-------

On the line of 'subscriptions'. Personally, I don't lump 'rent-to-own' or absurd payment plans for bathroom remodels into 'subscriptions' per se. Related to car sales, there was a time when almost every customer was termed a 'payment buyer'. They (sometimes to their own detriment) never asked anything else about the financing of the vehicle other than, "What's my monthly payment?"
Not sure if this is what you mean, but I've heard that about NEW car buyers. The dealer line is something like "We'll take your old car in trade, pay off your old loan [roll it into the new loan], and your monthly payment will be only ..."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.