DIYA store "Wolverine" (Son of Badger) .... suggestions ??

What about a helper transistors for the current mirror to help keep the balance of the currents closer and improve the transfer functio. It also causes the collectors of both IPS transistors to be at the same DC potential. Screenshot_20210405-155228_Firefox.jpgScreenshot_20210405-155440_Drive.jpg
 
Last edited:
Final - all of it .... except for mistakes.

ALL the work. (below)

I appreciate the design suggestions , "diminishing returns" ....

This is why the project is open ended. With a 50 X 120mm addon board ,
design a 50 semi SMD - plug it in.

It was informative ....

- Really learned the Servo - got a better one.
- Added two pole compensation.
- Lifted ground , fat power terminals.
- MUCH better looking drafts !!

Any mistakes , please comment.
Below is LT/sprint + pix ..
I just did the servo section , still checking for errors.

OS
 

Attachments

  • wolverine 1.3.zip
    wolverine 1.3.zip
    19.3 KB · Views: 218
  • DIYAWolverine.zip
    DIYAWolverine.zip
    80.6 KB · Views: 223
  • wolverine PCB final.jpg
    wolverine PCB final.jpg
    680.4 KB · Views: 672
  • wolverine schema - final.jpg
    wolverine schema - final.jpg
    289.3 KB · Views: 678
Everybody wants everything !!

I do see Q10's collector not hooked to the rail. I suppose I must change
that.

10R for R19?? That would depend on the device , do we really need much
current ? This is not a EF2. Badger needs current , that EF2 can load mA's
from the VAS.
This EF3 loads at under 50uA /100Vp-p 2R. This why I see no change. VAS is unloaded and
pretty much isolated from any load.

Thank you , Hugh.

OS
 
PSRR

Dual mono with a cheap power supply....
VERY good PSRR. That is with max 100u/100v nichicon's for C102/3 - C106/7.
Ripple eaters = HB is no match. IPS w/servo just uses 12mA per rail - a
literal "cool" amp.

OS
 

Attachments

  • PSRR.jpg
    PSRR.jpg
    145.7 KB · Views: 494
hi wow that look so good I'm gonna spend time looking at it OS also I like this idea of PCB that can use other IPS designs there with stand off nice, so I see 120 mm x 49.500 mm 🙂 ohhh terminal screw I see you 😛 also no outline yet still on revision?



edited: ohhh got it "I just did the servo section , still checking for errors. OS"
 

Attachments

  • I love this idea of PCB.JPG
    I love this idea of PCB.JPG
    178.3 KB · Views: 523
  • nice lol.JPG
    nice lol.JPG
    377.7 KB · Views: 514
  • outline.JPG
    outline.JPG
    127.9 KB · Views: 275
Last edited:
Some questions while everyone is here.

1. What type, voltage, pitch capacitor is ideal for the Zobel. Capacitor rated for AC or DC.

2. As for the 100nF decoupling capacitors, is it better to use X7R here or Wima film caps ?

Regards
 
OS I think I found a little text error Q3 and Q6 bases are connected when I was looking at the schematic I got lost 😛, I saw Q5 and Q6 face to face and I be like ? I be like hold on Q5 should be with Q4 right?
 

Attachments

  • INVERTED  1.JPG
    INVERTED 1.JPG
    283.7 KB · Views: 200
  • INVERTED  2.JPG
    INVERTED 2.JPG
    174.8 KB · Views: 198
that can be done sure the pads, I notice this too, is Q10 emitter suppose to go to V+ rail right? is not connected there? I see Q10 emitter to C5 and stop right there 🙁, C5 =10uF and C7=100nF ID updated 🙂, the pads size can be change later, lets help Ostripper find little bugs the best we can ST 🙂
 

Attachments

  • checking the layout 2.JPG
    checking the layout 2.JPG
    235.2 KB · Views: 437
  • checking the layout 3.JPG
    checking the layout 3.JPG
    212.4 KB · Views: 445
Last edited:
OS I think I found a little text error Q3 and Q6 bases are connected when I was looking at the schematic I got lost 😛, I saw Q5 and Q6 face to face and I be like ? I be like hold on Q5 should be with Q4 right?

Layout - Looks right to me.

Q5/3 are reversed on the schema. Thanks.

Should Go 1/5/3 on the input side , 2/6/4 on the NFB side.

R8 is Q4's Re , R7 is Q3's
Q5/6 bases are buffer divider R5/6.

Updated Schema below.

OS
 

Attachments

  • wolverine schema - final corr..jpg
    wolverine schema - final corr..jpg
    286 KB · Views: 574
that can be done sure the pads, I notice this too, is Q10 emitter suppose to go to V+ rail right? is not connected there? I see Q10 emitter to C5 and stop right there 🙁, C5 =10uF and C7=100nF ID updated 🙂, the pads size can be change later, lets help Ostripper find little bugs the best we can ST 🙂

I got that one last night. Q10 C goes top foil to + of C3 then bottom side to rail.
Tiny 3mm trace was lost - oops.

Thanks.

OS
 
Why would you ask me this ??

450 uA per rail. They are not shunt regs. That is 25mW.
By that logic every KSA992 on the board would blow.

Cascode 992's use 92mW. 992 is rated 500mW.
Q8 = 3.2ma @ 58 Vce .... it runs cold at 185mW.
In the real world , I've built these regs- used with 45V rails..
1845/992's ran COLD !!
Previously used Zener shunts , those ran hot. Especially the resistor.

PS - You could even use TO-92's for the main ripple eaters. 2V drop/15mA - 30mW.
But I like overkill - TO126. Startup inrush might come closer to the 992's rating.

OS
 
Last edited:
What about a helper transistors for the current mirror to help keep the balance of the currents closer and improve the transfer functio. It also causes the collectors of both IPS transistors to be at the same DC potential.View attachment 939118View attachment 939119


OS you don't like this suggestion?

Also I cannot tell what the lead pitch is for C113. Can you make it variable like R127, that it's connected to? My preference is to use a large plastic cap at the output in case of oscillation etc?

Thanks for another wonderful design.