I have some more information for you;To be honest, the problem with standards is that everyone has their own standards.
AFAIK, Brüel & Kjær spec their capsules at 3% THD, and peak SPL at 10% THD.
Here's what I've gathered so far study on microphone capsules / phantom powered microphones:
In no particular order...
�
Brand Model Noise Floor Maximum SPL based on THD (%) dB Not listed 10% 3% 2% 1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.1% 0.03% Sonarworks SoundID Reference(2024)* 124 Merry Electronics MMA209-003* 133 130 128 120 110 94 Sonarworks Xref20/SoundID 24 128 miniDSP Umik-1 133 miniDSP Umik-2 20 125 Line Audio Omni1 18 133 iSEMcon EMX-7150 30 144 136 130 CPX-1212 155 micW M215 18 135 Earthworks(2022) M23 20 Earthworks M23R 140 Earthworks M30 20 140 Earthworks M50 20 140 Audix TM1/Plus 28 140 130 ACO Pacific 7502PH 18 150 PCB Piezotronics 376A31 40 165 156 376A33 22 150 376A32 15 137 Dayton AudioEMM-6 24 127 Behringer ECM8000 NL NTI Audio M2010 24 142 M2215 25 153
https://www.pcb.com/contentstore/MktgContent/LinkedDocuments/Reports/3P03218condensedreport.pdf
Attachments
I found this interesting item wrt HIGH SPL calibraton of microphones: https://bswa.oss-cn-shanghai.aliyuncs.com/202309/20230912143350179.pdf It does not look too difficult to make if somneone can work through the math. Use a compression driver to drive it.
Well here is something interesting.
Since I have some work coming up this week and most of my stuff is STILL in moving boxes, I though you know what, let's just do a fun comparison since I have everything out anyway.
This is all measured at 95±3 mm distance, with a sampling rate or 44.1kHz and a sequence length of 64k (important! )
Mics in this test:
Amplifier: LM3886
SPL was later checked and calibrated with the Dayton EMM6 with a B&K 4230 (just because of no particular reason) at a 115dB peak @ 95mm.
Although I will do another proper check again to make sure.
It doesn't really matter, it's about the relative differences! (but nice to have the right numbers there )
Speaker: no idea, some kind of Kenwood cheapo whatever, the rest is still in moving boxes
Don't pay attention to the exact differences at the higher frequencies, except for the distance, the mics were NOT 100% exactly lined up (so above a certain frequency you will see differences)
But hello H2/D2/K2, didn't see you coming.
The effect is much worse at even higher SPL's, will show you after dinner or so
btw; pixel peeping will be punished! ☝️
Since I have some work coming up this week and most of my stuff is STILL in moving boxes, I though you know what, let's just do a fun comparison since I have everything out anyway.
This is all measured at 95±3 mm distance, with a sampling rate or 44.1kHz and a sequence length of 64k (important! )
Mics in this test:
- Dayton EMM6
- Beyerdynamic MM1
- Line Audio Omni 1
Amplifier: LM3886
SPL was later checked and calibrated with the Dayton EMM6 with a B&K 4230 (just because of no particular reason) at a 115dB peak @ 95mm.
Although I will do another proper check again to make sure.
It doesn't really matter, it's about the relative differences! (but nice to have the right numbers there )
Speaker: no idea, some kind of Kenwood cheapo whatever, the rest is still in moving boxes
Don't pay attention to the exact differences at the higher frequencies, except for the distance, the mics were NOT 100% exactly lined up (so above a certain frequency you will see differences)
But hello H2/D2/K2, didn't see you coming.
The effect is much worse at even higher SPL's, will show you after dinner or so
btw; pixel peeping will be punished! ☝️
Attachments
Last edited:
I guess you refer to the low figures of the Line Audio eh? @ScottG has pointed that out a while ago. Here’s my quick and dirty comparison of the Omni1 and an ECM8000 from a while ago.
Oh I didn’t calibrate SPL here.
Oh I didn’t calibrate SPL here.
Attachments
Last edited:
If the circuitry inside the mic itself has proper regulation, this is not a problem at all.I wonder how much of the LF distortion is Phantom power circuitry compromises. Phantom power has always struck me as a compromise for convienence. One very difficult to maintain down to very low frequencies.
That being said, I also don't understand why we are still working with an ancient old standard that makes very little sense. Al major mic brands have their own power supply solution for this reason.
For phantom power stuff; just get rid of those silly 6k8 resistors, and give a proper regulated power supply and everyone is happy
Well not really, the Beyerdynamic and Line Audio are similar.I guess you refer to the low figures of the Line Audio eh?
Only the H2 of the cheap Dayton mic shoots up like crazy, while H3 stays basically the same between all of them.
I will try STEPS as well, especially with the higher harmonics.
Speaking of which, is swear that ARTA also used to do higher harmonics? 🤔🤔
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Distortion in Measurement Microphones - actual measurements