DAC AD1862: Almost THT, I2S input, NOS, R-2R

I am using WIN 10 LTSB and a separate PC for audio only. Everything works normally, except that when I use Album Player free, the volume control in the player does not work, regardless of which driver I use (ASIO, KS, WASAPI). I select the option to have variable volume in the player, but it doesn't work, it's always at max. volume. That player gives me the best sound of all the ones I've tried.
Volume never worked with JLS + Album Player. Maybe with old WIN driver version.
 
@NIXIE62 Perhaps a good time to test my headphones amplifier with potentiometer volume control and leave digital pot on 100%? 😁
I'm not much of a fan of headphones, I prefer loudspeakers. I find headphones very harmful, and I don't like music in my head. 🤣
I have a few pieces, nothing particularly high quality, I rarely use them. I leave it to the younger ones to try it out. 😎
 
Last edited:
Ok, I understand that. But I have several preamps, two with tubes (one is buffer Gain=0.95) and one SS. I think the preamp has to be with tubes, if everything else is SS, to bring some life to the music.

SS preamp is with OPA and then Mosfet source follower, to get Class A and Single ended mode. Tube premp is Broskie Aikido with Tesla 6CC42, buffer Aikido cathode follower with Amperex E88CC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: floyd89gr
Yes, it does indeed, because it reduces dynamic range, if I'm correct most (if not all) SW volume controls work by floating point conversion of samples and division (or less than 1 factor multiplication), followed by another floating point integer conversion. When you reduce volume by 6 dB, for example, you drop from -32768 to 32767 range to -16384 to 16383 (assuming a 16 bit file), to get half the voltage (or current) at the DAC's output, if I understood right how it works. Now imagine 10 dB or more of attenuation, I rest my case 😏
 
Last edited:
Yes, it does indeed, because it reduces dynamic range, if I'm correct
I don't know if it's because of that, it depends a lot on the player, how the digital volume is done. And the classic analog potentiometer has a bad effect on the sound, probably more than that digital control. That's why I switched exclusively to rotary switches with SMD resistors. I didn't notice much degradation with digital volume, when not correcting too much. When I listen dedicatedly, the digital volume is at 100%. When I listen casually, I use digital volume.
 
Here the Gerber files and the BoM :

1x IC1 AD797 SOIC8
facing downwards

1x Riv Susumu 0805 27R 0.5%
1x Rs Susumu 0805 27R 0.5%
1x Rf Susumu 0805 2.7k 0.5%

2x Cs Murata C0G 0805 10nF 25V
1x Civ Murata C0G 0603 2.2nF 50V (solder between Pins 2 & 3)
1x C8 Murata C0G 0603 51p 50V (for AD797 only)

Many thanks to Fran for verifying PCB.


Enjoy,
Patrick

Civ Murata C0G 0603 2.2nF 50V (solder between Pins 2 & 3)
<=
I don't know which pins 2 & 3 are?
Is there anyone who might show me a picture of soldered PCB?


20230726_225820.jpg
20230726_225738.jpg
 
We'll, this Gerber was posted here, so right thread.
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...st-tht-i2s-input-nos-r-2r.354078/post-7319860

The half circle cutout is the same as in a DIP8 package, indicating pin orientation.
Pin 2, 3 are where Riv is connected.
And Civ is in parallel with Riv, without saying.

You cannot solder Civ at the SOIC opamp.
You need to solder directly next to Riv at the round pads for the DIP8 pins.


Patrick
 
Last edited:
I hope the following picture help.

The "1" on the underside of the board is for alignment to pin 1 of the AD797. Then the cut-out notch shows the orientation for plugging it into the op-amp socket in the DAC board. You can see how I used a melf resistor for Riv and a ceramic cap for Civ in between the pins for 2&3. The only cap I had to hand for C8 was a little large, so it hangs off the side a bit!

I mounted mine in an op-amp socket and then can easily plug that into the DAC board.

Don't forget - you must remove Riv and Civ if they are installed on the DAC board!!!

My original post is here

fran
 

Attachments

  • PHO00044 (2).JPG
    PHO00044 (2).JPG
    259.2 KB · Views: 113
  • PHO00045 (2).JPG
    PHO00045 (2).JPG
    242.4 KB · Views: 127
  • Like
Reactions: miro1360 and EUVL