Here is my recommendation for CFA the LM1875.
The capacitor C2 is needed for lower Vdc offset on output.
Otherwise you end up with 4-5mV offset.
Attachments
Thanks lineup! Could you please indicate what to change if I's wanted the lowest gain possible.
I will experiment with this amp for a 18sound 1095ND CD and dont want to do to much digital attenuation.
These are 16 ohm version but I now run them with 24 ohm in series driven by a small Anaview amp but still need 9 dB digital att.
//
I will experiment with this amp for a 18sound 1095ND CD and dont want to do to much digital attenuation.
These are 16 ohm version but I now run them with 24 ohm in series driven by a small Anaview amp but still need 9 dB digital att.
//
The current sense resistor does not have to be in the speaker return/ground. It can be in the supply rails or between the output and the speaker.
https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifie...m/532277/constant-current-source-using-op-amp
https://www.edn.com/op-amp-can-source-or-sink-current/
This means that, yes, you can current drive a bridged amplifier. Since you are defining the current with the first amplifier, the second amp just increases the potential voltage available.
But I don't think actual current drive is a good idea. A better idea is a defined impedance that matches the speaker, which is also possible, but a bit tricky math wise, mixing negative and positive feedback. I did this years ago to match a 600 Ohms telecom application and modems did this.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...ed-with-current-mode-amplifier_fig2_271530002
https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifie...m/532277/constant-current-source-using-op-amp
https://www.edn.com/op-amp-can-source-or-sink-current/
This means that, yes, you can current drive a bridged amplifier. Since you are defining the current with the first amplifier, the second amp just increases the potential voltage available.
But I don't think actual current drive is a good idea. A better idea is a defined impedance that matches the speaker, which is also possible, but a bit tricky math wise, mixing negative and positive feedback. I did this years ago to match a 600 Ohms telecom application and modems did this.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...ed-with-current-mode-amplifier_fig2_271530002
Keep in mind the specified minimum stable gain of 10
(Or is that not applicable here?)
The gain-of-10 limit applies above the audio band. You could run unity gain at 500Hz as long as the gain is let-out above 5kHz. The usual voice-coil does that naturally. (No, you do not want unity gain, even for horns, just an example.)
The power BW I need is between 1k-20k. For a compression driver. Change my mind about 500 - my Xo is 1,6k but I would like some margin...
Situation now:
This matches my 4 4" basses.
I would like to get rid of the 24 ohms resistors and shave of a few of the DSP att dBs...
//
Situation now:
- 21 dB gain amp
- 24 ohm in series of a 16 ohm driver (10?)
- 9 dB attenuation in DSP.
This matches my 4 4" basses.
I would like to get rid of the 24 ohms resistors and shave of a few of the DSP att dBs...
//
R3 should be at least 2.62 Watt.
This is with +/-24 Volt supply and R3=0.47 Ohm and 8 Ohm speaker.
So I would say it should be a 5 Watt resistor.
The capacitor C2 can be anything from 10u to 100u.
It does not affect the upp bandwidth. It stays at 300kHz in any case.
C2 affects the lower bandwidth, -3dB.
10uF = 7Hz
100uF = 2 Hz
And between those C2 can be 22uF, 47uF, 68uF
Making a hard wired TDA2003 now.
Does anyone know, do I need the Zobel of 100nanofarad and 1 ohm for the TDA2003 if I never put a capacitive load like piezo tweeters on the output?
I only use fullrange drivers with a voice coil and nothing else. No network at all.
Can I leave the Zobel out then?
Does anyone know, do I need the Zobel of 100nanofarad and 1 ohm for the TDA2003 if I never put a capacitive load like piezo tweeters on the output?
I only use fullrange drivers with a voice coil and nothing else. No network at all.
Can I leave the Zobel out then?
Attachments
Last edited: