anatech said:The belt will move at increasing speed to oppose the rotation of the wheels.
That is stipulated
The plane accelerates normally with respect to the ground, the wheels are stationary with respect to the belt. [/B]
Chris, Please try and explain that one. I can't get my head around what the wheels and belt will be doing at the point of takeoff in your scenario. ie: the speed and rotation of each.
Here we go again! 😱 [/B]
Indeed.
Hi Cal and Al,
Didn't you have enough the first time around??🙄 😀 😀
Cal, in my version, the belt moves to oppose the rotation of the wheels. So when the wheels begin to rotate, the belt must move in the direction that the fuselage is moving to stop that motion. Therefore, the rotation of the wheels is replaced by the forward motion of the belt. Plane is happy and off it goes.
Sorry, just had to respond.
-Chris
Didn't you have enough the first time around??🙄 😀 😀
Cal, in my version, the belt moves to oppose the rotation of the wheels. So when the wheels begin to rotate, the belt must move in the direction that the fuselage is moving to stop that motion. Therefore, the rotation of the wheels is replaced by the forward motion of the belt. Plane is happy and off it goes.
Sorry, just had to respond.

-Chris
anatech said:Therefore, the rotation of the wheels is replaced by the forward motion of the belt. Plane is happy and off it goes.
How is the belt moving if the wheels are not?
Surely with Chris's interpretation of the problem, the wheels are moving at half the airspeed, and so is the belt...
Hi Cal,
In answer ...
Tell you what, send me a ticket (round trip) and we'll discuss this over a beer, maybe a few. Then we'll celebrate!
Al,
The wheels are not rotating and the belt is moving to ensure the wheels do not turn.
-Chris
In answer ...
The question is in the point of reference. I am making the assumption that the situation is plausible in that nothing that defies physics is allowed to occur. Otherwise, it's a rather pointless question as a mind exercise. The question is pointless as it relates to our reality.Cal, in my version, the belt moves to oppose the rotation of the wheels. So when the wheels begin to rotate, the belt must move in the direction that the fuselage is moving to stop that motion. Therefore, the rotation of the wheels is replaced by the forward motion of the belt. Plane is happy and off it goes.
Tell you what, send me a ticket (round trip) and we'll discuss this over a beer, maybe a few. Then we'll celebrate!

Al,
The wheels are not rotating and the belt is moving to ensure the wheels do not turn.
-Chris
anatech said:The wheels are not rotating and the belt is moving to ensure the wheels do not turn.
Ah, but if the wheels are not rotating, then the belt can't move...
Hi Al,
Sure the belt can move. With respect to the ground, not the wheels. Otherwise you have an impossible situation. All that thrust and only magic to hold everything back!
-Chris
Sure the belt can move. With respect to the ground, not the wheels. Otherwise you have an impossible situation. All that thrust and only magic to hold everything back!
-Chris
Hi Cal,
I posted too.
Please forgive me for this ....
A snippet, if you will ...
-Chris
I posted too.
Please forgive me for this ....
I had to.Imagine a plane is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation.
A snippet, if you will ...
Okay, a smaller piece of the above ....The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation.
I interpret this to mean the belt opposes the rotation of the wheel. Is this okay?moving in the opposite direction of rotation.
-Chris
Hi John,
Unlike myself, you are too intelligent to post in this thread!
I guess you are here to enjoy the show?
-Chris
Unlike myself, you are too intelligent to post in this thread!

-Chris
BTW, A commersial jet cannot lift stationary(and to whoever said that)...that was the stupid thing i've ever heard in my life.
seriously.
seriously.
bottom line. the jets push the plane, not the wheels. therefor the plane will take off and the conveyor belt will loose traction because the plane is lifting itself in movement. if will fly, will take a long-asss time because the conveyor is stealing all of the planes potential momentum....like as if the plane was loaded with way more weight then it should have. but once its in the air. it'll take off no problem. (assuming the wheels dont have terrible bearings, creating drag)
well...in that theory the wheels could increase speed indefenantly and the rubber would explode when they wear down and rub up against the aluminum landing gear...so the plane would meet face to face with the conveyor at thousands of MPH and be thrown back into a giant fireball. 

Have you considered that if the plane has moved along the belt that it means the wheels are moving faster than the belt, which we know to be incorrect. The plane goes nowhere, it can't make progress regardless of thrust.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Calling all clever people :) What do you make of this?