I would like a sanity check on this configuration that I would like to order:
Buffalo-IIISE
IVY-III output stage with Placid HD BP power supply
Placid HD power supply
TOSLINK input board
4-channel SPDIF input board
USB DAC receiver
Metronome
Transformers: 9V and 15V
Will all of this play together?
The USB DAC, 4-Ch SPDIF, and Metronome are an interesting combination. How did you want to connect these all?
I would skip the USB DAC receiver personally. Its based on an older chip and limited to 48 kHz IIRC.
You are correct about the 48kHz limitation. Thank you. Scratch that one from the list.
The USB DAC, 4-Ch SPDIF, and Metronome are an interesting combination. How did you want to connect these all?
I would skip the USB DAC receiver personally. Its based on an older chip and limited to 48 kHz IIRC.
4-channel SPDIF input board
USB DAC receiver
Metronome
Will all of this play together?
- The 4-channel S/PDIF board WILL NOT WORK with the Buffalo-IIISE. It is designed for the Buffalo-III (8-channel).
- We do not plan to restock the old USB module.
- You do not need the Metronome with the Buffalo, unless you are using an older source with less than 64fs PCM (such as the CD-Pro transport).
Perhaps the Buffalo-IIISE isn't the right DAC for me. All of my music sources are FLACs ripped from (RedBook) CDs. Certainly the output filters get better at higher sample rates, but how much will upsampling to 88.2 or 176.4 improve things?
- The 4-channel S/PDIF board WILL NOT WORK with the Buffalo-IIISE. It is designed for the Buffalo-III (8-channel).
- We do not plan to restock the old USB module.
- You do not need the Metronome with the Buffalo, unless you are using an older source with less than 64fs PCM (such as the CD-Pro transport).
What leads you to that conclusion? I'm quite puzzled why you would think that...Perhaps the Buffalo-IIISE isn't the right DAC for me. All of my music sources are FLACs ripped from (RedBook) CDs.
Perhaps the Buffalo-IIISE isn't the right DAC for me. All of my music sources are FLACs ripped from (RedBook) CDs. Certainly the output filters get better at higher sample rates, but how much will upsampling to 88.2 or 176.4 improve things?
The Buffalo's ES9018 chip has an ASRC built-in, which takes care of re-sampling. That's why you do not need a Metronome.
My main music source (well, the one I listen to most often), is a Squeezebox transcoding FLAC, feeding a Buffalo. The difference is quite noticeable.
My main music source (well, the one I listen to most often), is a Squeezebox transcoding FLAC, feeding a Buffalo. The difference is quite noticeable.
And the result is stunningly good.
If you are just connecting SPDIF sources to the 3SE it sounds like all you need is a source selector.
I have a SqueezeBox-3 Classic and was planning to use its S/PDIF output into the Buffalo-IIISE to drive a balanced input Pass F5 amplifier.
The Buffalo's ES9018 chip has an ASRC built-in, which takes care of re-sampling. That's why you do not need a Metronome.
My main music source (well, the one I listen to most often), is a Squeezebox transcoding FLAC, feeding a Buffalo. The difference is quite noticeable.
I guess I do not understand the implications of BrianDonegan's statement:
"You do not need the Metronome with the Buffalo, unless you are using an older source with less than 64fs PCM (such as the CD-Pro transport). How is the SqueezeBox-3 S/PDIF output characterized?
"You do not need the Metronome with the Buffalo, unless you are using an older source with less than 64fs PCM (such as the CD-Pro transport). How is the SqueezeBox-3 S/PDIF output characterized?
What leads you to that conclusion? I'm quite puzzled why you would think that...
I examined the S/PDIF output from my SqueezeBox-3 Classis with an oscilloscope. With idle output I see "mostly" a square wave with an approximately 700ns period with means a frequency of 1.428 MHz. That is approximately 32 times the 44.1kHz sample rate output from the SqueezeBox. When I play music, I see transitions at twice that frequency, ie. 350ns between negative pulse transitions. Does that mean the output is 64fs and does not require using the Metronome?
Last edited:
Ihquam...
You do not need the metronome with the Buffalo-III, in fact, using it would be redundant, and would likely result in worse performance. The Buffalo-III includes its own (better) masterclock and upsampler, and it upsamples to a much higher rate than the metronome is capable of.
There will be no problem running the SPDIF output of your Squeezbox directly into the Buffalo-IIISE, in fact, this approach will result in the best perfromance possible from an SPDIF source.
You do not need the metronome with the Buffalo-III, in fact, using it would be redundant, and would likely result in worse performance. The Buffalo-III includes its own (better) masterclock and upsampler, and it upsamples to a much higher rate than the metronome is capable of.
There will be no problem running the SPDIF output of your Squeezbox directly into the Buffalo-IIISE, in fact, this approach will result in the best perfromance possible from an SPDIF source.
Thank you, that is (part of) the answer I was looking for. I have been trying to understand the 64fs part of the response from BrianDonegan: "You do not need the Metronome with the Buffalo, unless you are using an older source with less than 64fs PCM (such as the CD-Pro transport)."
You do not need the metronome with the Buffalo-III, in fact, using it would be redundant, and would likely result in worse performance. The Buffalo-III includes its own (better) masterclock and upsampler, and it upsamples to a much higher rate than the metronome is capable of.
There will be no problem running the SPDIF output of your Squeezbox directly into the Buffalo-IIISE, in fact, this approach will result in the best perfromance possible from an SPDIF source.
Brian...
Was talking about I2S, not SPDIF. The Buffalo-IIISE is ready to go for any SPDIF source. In fact, it is easier to use than the Opus because the Buffalo-IIISE automatically switches its filters and upsampling to suit any incoming sample rate from 44.1 to 384.
So, you do not need a metronome, and for best performance, just run a single SPDIF input directly to the board. If you want to add USB, this will be easy to do as well when TPA releases their (long awaited) asynchronous USB receiver-to accommodate a single SPDIF and the USB receiver (which will output I2S to the Buffalo) you do not need any additional input board, you just need the I/V stage and power supplies to suit...
Was talking about I2S, not SPDIF. The Buffalo-IIISE is ready to go for any SPDIF source. In fact, it is easier to use than the Opus because the Buffalo-IIISE automatically switches its filters and upsampling to suit any incoming sample rate from 44.1 to 384.
So, you do not need a metronome, and for best performance, just run a single SPDIF input directly to the board. If you want to add USB, this will be easy to do as well when TPA releases their (long awaited) asynchronous USB receiver-to accommodate a single SPDIF and the USB receiver (which will output I2S to the Buffalo) you do not need any additional input board, you just need the I/V stage and power supplies to suit...
There is no problem using S/PDIF with the BIIISE. In fact, it's easier and cheaper to do with the BIIISE than with the BIII.I guess I do not understand the implications of BrianDonegan's statement:
"You do not need the Metronome with the Buffalo, unless you are using an older source with less than 64fs PCM (such as the CD-Pro transport). How is the SqueezeBox-3 S/PDIF output characterized?
There are some gaps in the BIIISE configuration, like how to get AES/EBU input or how to cheaply get 3-4 S/PDIF inputs (the classic Receiver/Mux is $129) but perhaps modules that offer this functionality will be introduced later on.
Having an Opus with Metronome, is a Buffalo III SE a big step forward?
Trying to open a Paypal account seems to take a couple of days. In the meantime a short answer to my question would be appreciated. 🙂
I also have a WavIO board (WaveIO | Luckit). I guess it is no problem connecting that for USB input...
Yes...
But only you can determine how big a step up the B-III will be. Additionally, how you do your build will have some impact on the sound quality.
Yes, the WaveIO will be very easy to hook up, especially with the B-IIISE, as you can use u.fl cables for the I2S lines.
Trying to open a Paypal account seems to take a couple of days. In the meantime a short answer to my question would be appreciated. 🙂
I also have a WavIO board (WaveIO | Luckit). I guess it is no problem connecting that for USB input...
But only you can determine how big a step up the B-III will be. Additionally, how you do your build will have some impact on the sound quality.
Yes, the WaveIO will be very easy to hook up, especially with the B-IIISE, as you can use u.fl cables for the I2S lines.
Well, I was planning a set up with an Ivy en two Placids. I know it 's difficult to discribe the differences, personally I hope the step up is as big as the financial differences between the Opus and Buffalo 😀
Hi
I use an IDE drive (pc) as a source for my cd, which I added a 75ohm transformer sc947-02 to convert the TTL-out to "real" SPDIF-out. If I understand correctly, the SPDIF-in is converted by the Buffalo so I think removing my sc947-02 and connect directly the drive and the dac in TTL level, is it okay?
My drive is a asus E818A4 with a dedicated psu
I use an IDE drive (pc) as a source for my cd, which I added a 75ohm transformer sc947-02 to convert the TTL-out to "real" SPDIF-out. If I understand correctly, the SPDIF-in is converted by the Buffalo so I think removing my sc947-02 and connect directly the drive and the dac in TTL level, is it okay?
My drive is a asus E818A4 with a dedicated psu
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- More Vendors...
- Twisted Pear
- Buffalo III - SE