Boundary control BC subwoofer BC218/2 Design

Does Hornresp do a simulation of step response - I'd be fascinated to see what such a long tract does to dynamics.
You could probably see what you are looking for in the Hornresp "Impulse Response" screen, and compare different cabinet designs.
As far as the impulse response, a sealed cabinet will have the least "junk", followed by bass reflex, front loaded horns, and tapped horns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I did this stepped model a couple of days ago.
It's for my next Panther (Ford Crown Vic, Mercury Grand Marquis, Lincoln Town Car) since my son is getting my current Crown Vic.

1722536081910.png

1722536098316.png
1722536114417.png

1722536168878.png
1722536244195.png

1722536282719.png
1722536301127.png
 

Attachments

  • 1722536193322.png
    1722536193322.png
    83.8 KB · Views: 18
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
We can see the decay of energy in the system following a short pulse
Bass strings and a foot on the speaker works for me very well too. Two parallel channels and plugging in a custom PJ with TRS taking P-neck to channel one and J-bridge to channel two and routing to parallel two more channels. This is using a Yamaha console. Simultaneous heavy attack on muted strings creating percussive sounds, clean and a deep low shadow activating the port. If the driver can produce these 4 channels back into the mix with clarity and stop when you stop the string, then it's a legend

Currently, I have found two such drivers that eat up all the energetic thumb attack that I can muster and those found on recordings
 
For the Hornresp simulations, I think you're missing the final expansion. And that's what makes a BC horn a BC horn instead of a normal FLH. Tom posted some hints to this, where he described it as a "bubble". If you picture a wavefront "bubbling" out from the exit of the speaker, that wavefront then keeps expanding. It's boundaries are the ground, and the front face of the speaker. So this is like an additional conical horn section. This is a bit easier to picture with the BC215, BC412 and BC415. With the BC218, I picture that wavefront spilling/diffracting off the narrow side a bit. So I'm not sure what you do for the bubble surface then. Perhaps take an average of the two distances along each perpendicular direction it would expand. I did some Hornresp guesses of the BC415 at some point and convinced myself adding this extra expansion was a good approach (and backed that up with some ABEC3 sims). That is a cool thing about a BC horn -- you don't have to carry around structure for that final expansion. Still, this is a heavy beast and a whole lot of wood. For a DIY approach, I like the BC215 sized/shaped things instead. And that makes for a more obvious "bubble".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Here's an example of a 215-like something. Red line is the path. Blue is the horn structure. White is the "bubble". I did this stuff back in 2016 and never built anything.
 

Attachments

  • wire.png
    wire.png
    12.3 KB · Views: 46
  • bubble.png
    bubble.png
    17.2 KB · Views: 43
  • HRinputs.PNG
    HRinputs.PNG
    6.2 KB · Views: 46
  • HRschematic.PNG
    HRschematic.PNG
    4.1 KB · Views: 48
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Here's an example of a 215-like something. Red line is the path. Blue is the horn structure. White is the "bubble". I did this stuff back in 2016 and never built anything.
Interesting, could you share .stp file with me? I might be interested to build 2 or 4 of those in the future. Would it be possible to increase depth to use with 18 inch drivers? I can also go with something like 15SW115 but would prefer on staying on 18s. Bc215 seem quite popular and go low enough for 99% of applications. I started bc218 thread because I wanted something more extreme but something like BC215 definitely seem better for a lot of aplications.
 
It's DIY so you can use any size driver you want. What I did with 2x 15's was about 48" square and 24" deep externally. I was sizing things with 1.25" thick panels though. This was for 1/8" thick plywood skins on 1" thick cardboard honeycomb core with poplar edge closeouts for mass savings. You could certainly size something for a single or double 18 and normal plywood thickness construction. You pay a steep price in SPL for going lower and lower in frequency. Hoffman's Iron law is a nuisance like that. Making the front face bigger will get you more directivity lower in frequency, so I'd maximize the frontal area before doing deeper in size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Project update

Recieved plywood, now waiting in CNC workshop for cutting. They are kinda busy right now so it might take a while.
Recieved 4 pieces of 6mm aluminium plates used for cooling back chamber, they look sturdy but i might have to add some additional bracing

Will keep you updated
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users