reading reviews of rounded baffles, the sound image is better compared to it “sticking” to the baffle…. Think revel salon vs f206.
I find felt around a dome tweeter makes the highs “sharper”, clearer.
But a ball enclosure has a huge internal standing wave internally due to wavelength vs diameter. I think the egg would be best to randomize internal freq pressures….
I like the idea of a tall column. You would still need to address the circular standing wave, but maybe you can use the height to your advantage similar to a mltl……
Think the kef blade for a shape…..
I find felt around a dome tweeter makes the highs “sharper”, clearer.
But a ball enclosure has a huge internal standing wave internally due to wavelength vs diameter. I think the egg would be best to randomize internal freq pressures….
I like the idea of a tall column. You would still need to address the circular standing wave, but maybe you can use the height to your advantage similar to a mltl……
Think the kef blade for a shape…..
You do not hear the wavefront following the baffle because there are no disturbances to make a sound 😉
Continuation of a correct baffling arrangement doesn't result in diffraction..
Not that all diffraction is unavoidable, and nor does all diffraction have to be a problem.
Narrow baffles are about dumping all the diffraction as soon as possible, counting on mitigating circumstances. Unfortunately it also forgoes controlling directivity.
Not that all diffraction is unavoidable, and nor does all diffraction have to be a problem.
Narrow baffles are about dumping all the diffraction as soon as possible, counting on mitigating circumstances. Unfortunately it also forgoes controlling directivity.