B1 Rev. 2

Thanks Pico. I think the 500 Ohm V dropper sounds simple enough.
Unfortunately, I have no space in my chassis for any additional components or transformers. I have some 28V switchers in place already in place for a solid state power amp stage. Additionally, I have some B+ stuff happening for a tube pre stage. I just need the B1 because I'm using a 100K pot after the tube stage and before the power stage, and need the buffer to clean up some voltage loss because of the impedance mismatch.

As an alternative, does the attached caveman approach work ok, from a B1 input impedance and also performance perspective? I don't care about the wasted heat of the divider. Actually, the SMPS works better (resonant type) with a little extra load on it, and I have power to spare.

View attachment 1128558

The idea is totally fine but you will be pulling a lot more current across the first resistor so the voltage drop will be larger than expected.

If that’s driving both channels then something like 470/1500 is probably closer to what you might want.
 
Even if the IP is double as good, this simple sloppy thing I threw together with pin sockets is still pretty impressive. Smooth as mothers milk 🤱

A bit lacking in the bass, but need to revise the PSU. We’ll see :)

I know you are already working on this but if you need further encouragement, I will say this: A preamp or buffer is no place to make compromises on the powersupply, we just don't need to, or should make compromises here.

You haven't truly heard the pre/buffer circuit until the supply is at least 10 times better than it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The idea is totally fine but you will be pulling a lot more current across the first resistor so the voltage drop will be larger than expected.

If that’s driving both channels then something like 470/1500 is probably closer to what you might want.
Thanks! I hadn't considered the draw across the first resistor in calculating. Just used the dumb resistor divider equation. :spin:
I can play with some values.
Do you consider this a compromise in power supply (as per your response to Andynor). Seems that a 100-500R and 4700uF have a pretty good low pass filter response across the audible range especially because with the SMPS the 60 and 120Hz components are already way down below -100dB (from previous measurements)
 
Member
Joined 2010
Paid Member
The idea is totally fine but you will be pulling a lot more current across the first resistor so the voltage drop will be larger than expected.

If that’s driving both channels then something like 470/1500 is probably closer to what you might want.
Could do away with the voltage divider and just use a series dropping resistor. Combined with the decoupling capacitor at the buffer pcb will make a nice RC filter.
 
Thanks! I hadn't considered the draw across the first resistor in calculating. Just used the dumb resistor divider equation. :spin:
I can play with some values.
Do you consider this a compromise in power supply (as per your response to Andynor). Seems that a 100-500R and 4700uF have a pretty good low pass filter response across the audible range especially because with the SMPS the 60 and 120Hz components are already way down below -100dB (from previous measurements)

Yeah this is one benefit of a switcher, it's easier filtering out high frequency noise with RC filtering compared with getting rid of 100Hz of rectified ripple.

I would include additional RC filtering per channel - say 5 Ohms and 4700uF per channel after the main supply you have illustrated.

Taking it one step further would be adding shunts or a loaded series regulator per channel after that additional dual mono RC filtering step.
 
Could do away with the voltage divider and just use a series dropping resistor. Combined with the decoupling capacitor at the buffer pcb will make a nice RC filter.

Yes that will also work, but I think it is preferable having less series resistance and more capacitance, rather than more series resistance and less capacitance.
Adding a little extra load on the supply is also beneficial, so I like his idea a little more.
 
When I powered up and gave a listen, my first thought… “where did the bass go?”
I was impatient and used a 24V wallwart.
Good Gemini will be next ;)
What would be the mechanism such that the frequency response would be altered so significantly by a 24VDC wall wart? I understand it might be noisy as hell but how would the bass be impacted, unless it’s was severely underpowered in terms of wattage? I’m genuinely curious, not at all trying to bust balls.
 
An IP board with a selectable trafo bypass would be ideal. Three settings:
Bypass/6dB/12dB
Removed some stuffing from my overstuffed Superpencils yesterday, and fine tuned the F2J’s output impedance, and re-removed degen on the B1R2 boards. Bass is now pretty decent.

Have been having dialogue with Pico lately, and will make some adjustments to the power supply and then add RC filters for both chans, not far from what the original schem calls for. Still, clarity is the best I have had. With no hint of harshness.

My ultimate goal is the Iron Pumpkin. But I really like finding out what this circuit is all about first. Then go to maybe shunt and or other form of dual mono, then inductive attenuator.

Mighty made the ultimate, so can’t reinvent that wheel for that and Iq reasons :rofl:

But I can still follow the path and experience the steps, step by step.
 
Last edited: