audio grade vs general purpose capacitors

Status
Not open for further replies.
As usual, I see this thread has gone the typical way that always results when the word "Capacitor" is in the title.
It always brings out the critics, the obsessed, the nitpickers, in an endless parade.
And so with that.... I'm gone.
 
There are measurable differences shown decades ago. And the levels measured are far below any human audibility. A well known fact as well -
:shhh: You are destroying the marketing material for boutique audio business. Expect retaliation. :smash:

except for golden ears that hear distortion below noise level and improve sound by applying Bye-Byes.
They claim to hear but not proven.
 
Humans brain activity is none of those so-called 'buzzwords.' For example, EEG is not stationary.

To quote from: Everything you wanted to ask about EEG but were afraid to get the right answer "...human brain are complex nonlinear systems generating nonstationary nonlinear signals, and that appropriate analysis of such signals does need new nonlinear methods."

What makes some overly simplistic engineers so sure the same doesn't apply to brain activity such as is involved in hearing?
 
Last edited:
i have not tried exotic costly electrolytic caps, but everytime i change a cap to a nichicon kz that suits circuit requirements, it is always for the best, either signal or psu decoupling. Really a bang for buck wonder for audio. I also tried it in a video card and PC SMPSU and the dipslay image did looked better, mind you!
 
Hi John,
I hate to say it guys, but audio caps are made differently, and serious audio designers of the highest quality equipment take care to use the best caps we can find. IF, any of you critics of cap differences actually found out from the cap manufacturers what the cap differences actually are, you might be surprised.
All due respect, I knew this is what you would say, but I didn't expect you to participate.

So what makes an audio signal different to any other signal John? Nothing.

Good capacitor manufacturers produce excellent products that pass signals faithfully. The marketing silliness that boutique capacitors come out with is pure hype. I've auditioned, and tested part for decades with equipment that has improved as time went on. The only thing I have found is that boutique capacitors are always pretty much too large to fit where the original part went. Therefore they cause problems when retrofit into otherwise very good equipment and sometimes impair the performance measurably. Of course the installers of those parts always hear an improvement even when you can prove they caused a problem.

Face it John, boutique parts are used purely to differentiate a product from the rest of the crowd, an advertising gimmick only. As a person that utilizes these marketing techniques, you will go down fighting on this subject. However there isn't one shred of real evidence that has ever been offered to support your position.

-Chris
 
Humans brain activity is none of those so-called 'buzzwords.' For example, EEG is not stationary.

To quote from: Everything you wanted to ask about EEG but were afraid to get the right answer "...human brain are complex nonlinear systems generating nonstationary nonlinear signals, and that appropriate analysis of such signals does need new nonlinear methods."

What makes some overly simplistic engineers so sure the same doesn't apply to brain activity such as is involved in hearing?

I have not see such an amazingly absurd shift of focus (from capacitors properties in an AC filter, to the properties of the EEG signal) in a very long time.

Only your expectation to be taken seriously is more amazing 😀.
 
Coupling caps are the most important, and eq caps as well, but even power supply caps can make a difference in the best designs.


What makes a design in that context "best"? One that uses lots of LC filters and totally ignores time constants and poles? One that has a myriad of unstable nodes that are so sensitive that their various oscillations can be tuned by something like the parasitic inductance of a resistor?
 
The main differentiation between an audio grade capacitor for power supply filtering or decoupling is an ESR (or more correctly an effective series impedance) that is relatively consistent versus frequency in the range of audio frequencies.


With "relatively consistent versus frequency" do you mean it stays constant or that change of impedance vs frequency is linear? The first would mean the capacitor is shorted, the graph of the latter, well is something I have never seen in the datasheet of an "audio" capacitor.
 
Last edited:
Capacitors, especially physically large capacitors used for power supply filtering, have far from idealised pure capacitance. The method of construction introduces complex distributed LCR networks within the capacitor which will have resonant modes that may or may not be within the audio band.

Eddy currents flow within the folded foil conductors. Slit foil capacitors commonly used for audio amplifier power supplies are designed to limit/reduce these parasitic eddy currents and the effect they have on dynamic performance.

Mechanical resonances also occur within capacitor structures, both self-induced and externally driven in by noise and vibration where the capacitor is installed in some applications.

Ionic insulators (polymers that have molecules with positively and negatively charged ends) introduce nonlinearity in the static transfer function of capacitors, and the capacitor's insulator dialectric properties are affected by AC and/or DC bias across the plates to a greater or lesser extent depend on the choice of material.

All of these effects are at least in part application and environment dependent, therefore difficult for a manufacturer to quantify when they don't control either. It's much easier to pretend they don't exist. It is up to the designer to take into account the needs of a given application and chose an appropriate design.
 
Capacitors, especially physically large capacitors used for power supply filtering, have far from idealised pure capacitance. The method of construction introduces complex distributed LCR networks within the capacitor which will have resonant modes that may or may not be within the audio band.

Eddy currents flow within the folded foil conductors. Slit foil capacitors commonly used for audio amplifier power supplies are designed to limit/reduce these parasitic eddy currents and the effect they have on dynamic performance.

Mechanical resonances also occur within capacitor structures, both self-induced and externally driven in by noise and vibration where the capacitor is installed in some applications.

Ionic insulators (polymers that have molecules with positively and negatively charged ends) introduce nonlinearity in the static transfer function of capacitors, and the capacitor's insulator dialectric properties are affected by AC and/or DC bias across the plates to a greater or lesser extent depend on the choice of material.

All of these effects are at least in part application and environment dependent, therefore difficult for a manufacturer to quantify when they don't control either. It's much easier to pretend they don't exist. It is up to the designer to take into account the needs of a given application and chose an appropriate design.

Standard Operating Procedure:

Step 1. Correctly describing general properties of (here) capacitors.
Step 2. Inferring that any or all of these properties have any significant impact in audio reproduction, disregarding the (capacitor) type and role under discussion.
Step 3. Subliminal message: trust me, I am a recognized expert, look how much I know about capacitors.

Step 2 is also known as FUD, the most common High End Audio marketing/propaganda method, almost always used when facts and truth no longer serve the purpose.

Myself, I am much more comfortable with people flat claiming audible differences, then with those explicitly and knowingly attempting to distort information and facts, to justify those differences.
 
Amazingly the hifi collective website says abot slit foils


Conventional capacitors, being made of large, coiled, thin strips of aluminium, are prone to induce eddy currents across their conducting surface. These currents prevent the capacitor from doing its job optimally, thus degrading subjective sound quality. By introducing a series of tiny slits in the foil conductors these eddy currents are dramatically reduced, therefore, improving the subjective and measured performance.


So it must be true that they sound better if two people on the internet say the same thing 😀
 
Capacitors, especially physically large capacitors used for power supply filtering, have far from idealised pure capacitance.
None does, weeeellll known fact, well studied too, google "capacitor equivalent circuit"
en-20110414-p1_img0003g.png

Any new facts we don´t already know?
The method of construction introduces complex distributed LCR networks within the capacitor which will have resonant modes that may or may not be within the audio band.
* SHOW them
* MEASURE them
* describe the Laws governing them
* CALCULATE them.
Copypasting smokey definitions you don´t understand won´t make you look brighter.
By the way: "may or may not" is a non affirmation or non statement which turns the whole phrase self cancellating (polite way of saying "useless")

Eddy currents flow within the folded foil conductors. Slit foil capacitors commonly used for audio amplifier power supplies are designed to limit/reduce these parasitic eddy currents and the effect they have on dynamic performance.
Again:
* SHOW them
* MEASURE them
* describe the Laws governing them
* CALCULATE them.
Mechanical resonances also occur within capacitor structures, both self-induced and externally driven in by noise and vibration where the capacitor is installed in some applications.
Again.
Sob far, what you copypasted has no content or applicability on the thread subject.
Ionic insulators (polymers that have molecules with positively and negatively charged ends) introduce nonlinearity in the static transfer function of capacitors, and the capacitor's insulator dialectric properties are affected by AC and/or DC bias across the plates to a greater or lesser extent depend on the choice of material.
Same useless fog and smoke.
All of these effects are at least in part application and environment dependent, therefore difficult for a manufacturer to quantify when they don't control either.
Manufacturers DO control their own production with high precision.
And as a service to the end user, they state USEFUL data in datasheets.
What´s not printed there, they probably consider useless or unneeded for 99.9999% of end users.
And for good reason.
It's much easier to pretend they don't exist.
See above,they are usually irrelevant to end user.
It is up to the designer to take into account the needs of a given application and chose an appropriate design.
This looks like a MAO Red Book phrase, looks reasonable and means nothing.

A few samples.
To Moderators: this is not a Political statement in any way, just showing a particular case of phrase structure.
In fact they are fully devoid of meaning, not even a Political one 😱

When we look at a thing, we must examine its essence and treat its appearance merely as an usher at the threshold, and once we cross the threshold, we must grasp the essence of the thing; this is the only reliable and scientific method of analysis.

That said, I was surprised by finding a lot of accurate and to the point phrases 😱
Again, I am carefully avoiding the "political" ones but quoting the "apply anywhere" type.

This one is actually very good, as it recommends staying away from the subjective, and concentrating on the objective, by learning and following "the laws of the World" ... which in a wide meaning will include Physics Laws:
If a man wants to succeed in his work, that is, to achieve the anticipated results, he must bring his ideas into correspondence with the laws of the objective external world; if they do not correspond, he will fail in his practice.

Here he backs the experimental Method, go figure:
Whoever wants to know a thing has no way of doing so except by coming into contact with it, that is, by living (practicing) in its environment. ... If you want knowledge, you must take part in the practice of changing reality. If you want to know the taste of a pear, you must change the pear by eating it yourself...
If we have a correct theory but merely prate about it, pigeonhole it and do not put it into practice, then that theory, however good, is of no significance.
Not much patience for endless empty discussions 😛
 
Last edited:
None does, weeeellll known fact, well studied too, google "capacitor equivalent circuit"

Any new facts we don´t already know?
Yes, ESL, ESR, IR and C in your schematic can be more or less nonlinear, time-variant and non stationary, which may or may not induce clearly audible effects when used in a power supply filter. Look at me how smart I am.

:rofl:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.