• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

anyone interested in a jung regulator pcb group buy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Digital app's

How about digital applications?

Well, since most digital apps are 5V or lower, the AD825 and AD797 are excluded for that reason.

I've not used many reg's for digital stuff, so my experience is more limited here, but certainly there are some newer, low voltage, op-amps worthy of investigation, as an alternative to the AD817, try looking to some of the THS series from TI. Most of the newer AD parts that are recommended for other apps (e.g. AD8065) are also unsuitable for a 5V reg, due to the common mode input range limitations of the FET part of the front end.

They may work with a lower reference voltage than the 2.5V I spec as standard for a 5V reg?

I'd recommend starting with the AD817 as a reference, then moving from there; many of the alternatives may not be as quiet either, since the high speed parts have much higher noise corners than some of the noisier looking alternatives, which may be important in some app's.

The AD8021 looks interesting, for example, but has a high noise corner and would almost definitely need additional compensation to work.

Andy.
 
Re: Digital app's

ALW said:


Well, since most digital apps are 5V or lower, the AD825 and AD797 are excluded for that reason.

I've not used many reg's for digital stuff, so my experience is more limited here, but certainly there are some newer, low voltage, op-amps worthy of investigation, as an alternative to the AD817, try looking to some of the THS series from TI. Most of the newer AD parts that are recommended for other apps (e.g. AD8065) are also unsuitable for a 5V reg, due to the common mode input range limitations of the FET part of the front end.

They may work with a lower reference voltage than the 2.5V I spec as standard for a 5V reg?

I'd recommend starting with the AD817 as a reference, then moving from there; many of the alternatives may not be as quiet either, since the high speed parts have much higher noise corners than some of the noisier looking alternatives, which may be important in some app's.

The AD8021 looks interesting, for example, but has a high noise corner and would almost definitely need additional compensation to work.

Andy.

Hi Andy,
The AD829 has low noise and has the speed of the AD817. But I would not power the opamp from the digital regulated +5V supply for obvious reasons:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=34795&perpage=15&pagenumber=1

😉
 
Re: Re: Digital app's

Elso Kwak said:


Hi Andy,
The AD829 has low noise and has the speed of the AD817. But I would not power the opamp from the digital regulated +5V supply for obvious reasons:
----------------------------------------------------------------
I am building one to see what happens. If it doesn't work, one can always power the IC from another superegulator!!! Then you should be able to use the AD825.
 
Re: Please read the data sheets!

ALW said:
The AD829 is not unity gain stable, or specced for anywhere near 5V operation, so it won't work (without some work).

Andy.

Hi,
As I said I would not power the opamp from 5V but something near 10V.
I just read the datasheet and it claims "Specified for +/- 5V to +/- 15V operation". Also the datasheet gives custom compensation making it possible to use the part as a unity gain follower or inverter. But a gain of two would be possible with a 2.5V reference.
Now who does not read the datasheet...............?
🙄
 
Elso,

I knew that!

I posted in reply to fmak, who seemed to be considering the AD829, without any sanity checking whatsoever.

As I said, it will not work, without some work, you've nicely re-iterated that - thanks 😉

Andy.

P.S. Why wouldn't you run the op-amp from the reg o/p (beyond the supply limitation problems)?
 
Clock spikes would enter the feedback loop.

They'll enter it anyway, unless you deal with them, since they will be present on the supply feed to the clock, which comes from the reg o/p, which in turn is where the feedback connects to...

That can all be dealt with by optimising decoupling, I'd have thought, plenty of clues in other threads for that.

Here wouldn't be a bad place to start: -

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=29259

Andy.
 
Clock Spikes

Hi Andy,
Yes you are right.
Besides that I tried that approach for a analog supply i.e. using the output as supply for the opamp, and it did not give any audible improvement.
For a supply for a clock circuit I don't believe any feedback from the output is good. Well that rules out the opamp..... Back to Jocko's follower?😉
The thread you advised a good place to start? It was one of the most confusing threads I ever participated in......
 
Feedback and stuff

For a supply for a clock circuit I don't believe any feedback from the output is good.

For all feedback amps (regs / audio / anything) you need to be careful of the bandwidth of the signals you feed into it, via any of the inputs.

That's what good design is about, and why many people find non-feedback systems easier to get working at their best. Open loop systems may in some circumstances be the best solution of all, there's plenty of examples out there.

Andy.
 
Re: Clock Spikes

Elso Kwak said:
Hi Andy,
Yes you are right.
Besides that I tried that approach for a analog supply i.e. using the output as supply for the opamp, and it did not give any audible improvement.
For a supply for a clock circuit I don't believe any feedback from the output is good. Well that rules out the opamp..... Back to Jocko's follower?😉
The thread you advised a good place to start? It was one of the most confusing threads I ever participated in......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I shall soon settle this, by powering a Tent or Valpey Fisher clock with the 5V version, and measuring then listening to the combied units.

The Audiocom 5V regulator totally collapse when feeding 30mA or so to a XO; even though it is excellent with a resistor!

Spews out harmonics like a sick man; clearly not stable.




:dodgy: :dodgy: :dodgy:
 
Re: Clock Spikes

Elso Kwak said:

Hi Andy,
Clock spikes would enter the feedback loop.:idea:

Hi Andy,
Actually I meant entering the powersupply pin(s) of the opamp. But feedback taken from the output would also be bad. There is a way around with a follower after the opamp and the feedback taken from the base of the transistor. This will of course make load regulation worse but I don't see that as a problem for a supply for a clock circuit.
😎
 
Status
Not open for further replies.