"a thread dedicated to our great dr bora"

not only happy but deeply honored is what i fell.

I use to say, to people in my place, that i am his friend, that he send me messages from time to time...that he even answer some of my messages.

hehehehe... This promotes me a lot...you do not imagine the respect they look at me.

The man is an Engineer, a skilled one, not a young engineer, a senior one!... with expertise and passion for audio, the man is a College teacher... anything can be better than that!

Lucky... very lucky we are.

regards,

Carlos

Like "Unsung Hero"..... I would call, Carlos.
His designs are unusual but performs surprisingly good.

Just Build & Listen. Than comment on it. hehehehe

Cheers.......Raj
 
hey, looking at Legend Quasor, each channel output is kind of split in two, with each their own dedicated driverstage
The obvious thing, it seem like its easy to totally seperate output into two biamp outputs

and if set up that way, and one wants the full output, its only a matter of paralel output terminals
double zobels might be a small issue thou

not that Im a fan of biamping, nor is it my goal, but would it work :scratch2: with appropriate lower voltage, ofcourse
 
My DOGC-Mk3

Many thanks to Dr Bora, who share many of his amplifiers. I thought that I should try at least one: DOGC-Mk3.

The main reason for me to choose DOGC is Dr Bora's introduction to this amplifier:

"Amplifier is absolutely stabile in operation and will deliver extremely high quality of sound. It posses remarkable dynamic and transparency as well as excellent extension of frequency spectrum on both ends. Give it appropriate and capable PSU and sufficient heatsink and you will be amazed with what this amp can deliver, having on mind its simplicity and overall costs! You won't be ashamed to use it side by side with most brand name amps of similar power within 1000-1500US$ price class."

First at all, the amp is very easy to build & there is no adjustment. I bought all my parts (excluding the PSU & BJT ouput transistors) from Farnell and it cost me less than $20.

I have to agree with every word in Dr Bora's comments quoted above - the amp sounds great & smooth - it adds air to the music. I don't have the audiophile's vocab & that is the best that I can describe the sound.

It does require a robust PSU, the DOGC sounds quite thin with a PSU with 4x8200uF filter caps and swapping to a PSU with 8x8200uF filter caps transform the amp into a great-sounding amp.

It does require a generous heatsink - my heatsink is a bit small & it is about 55C at idle. The temperature does not go up much for normal listening as the driver bias is set at 330mA.

Attached is some pictures.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2223.JPG
    DSC_2223.JPG
    461.3 KB · Views: 1,485
  • DSC_2231.JPG
    DSC_2231.JPG
    426.8 KB · Views: 1,388
Until present day I build only one of Dr. Bora's projects, that is Clepsidra preamp. Right now Clepsidra is working as temporary preamp packed in parfume box, but this little thingy plays very good. Preamp is awaiting proper box and wiring.
There is no output cap's, DC offset is lower than 1mV and stable. PCB's are also DIY.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5553.JPG
    IMG_5553.JPG
    132.8 KB · Views: 1,268
  • IMG_5555.JPG
    IMG_5555.JPG
    243.8 KB · Views: 1,169
  • IMG_5557.JPG
    IMG_5557.JPG
    229.5 KB · Views: 1,173
No, builder is probably thinking, otherwise he won’t produce anything, but I have to agree with AndrewT about first two statements – the way of mounting and orientation of fins.
Here is about optimal (if not even oversized) heatsink used by Croatian builder “zikinho” for his version of DOGC MK3.
 

Attachments

  • ZIKI-Dogc mk3-slika.jpg
    ZIKI-Dogc mk3-slika.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 788
Main problem in this case is not heat sink orientation, but the way devices are mounted

The shown paper on heatsink orientation doesnt suggest to mount devices on one of the cooling finns
Mounting base is there fore a reason


If devices fore any practical reason have to be mounted on finning that way, it would be much much better with fins facing down, and mounting base up
But there should be a free airflow below, and on heatsink ends
and on top of box, to have an active airflow
Thats important
But you wont find that in the books
 
Heatsink orientation

I agree that the mounting of the output devices are not optimal but there are other contraints - like the shape & size of the mountable surfaces.

First at all, I did not pay for the heatsink, they are recycled parts from a computer power supply. I have nine of these heatsinks so they are perfect for prototyping.

The base of the heatsink is not flat so I could not mount the output devices there.

If the amplfilier is good enough to be cased, the original computer power supply case can also serve as a good monoblock case.

I have attached pictures of my first DIY project - a LM3886 kit from eBay with DIY PSU board - it shows the look of the monoblock amplifier.


Cheers, Stanley
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2235.JPG
    DSC_2235.JPG
    459 KB · Views: 1,261
  • DSC_2234.JPG
    DSC_2234.JPG
    370.2 KB · Views: 1,335
  • DSC_2232.JPG
    DSC_2232.JPG
    441.3 KB · Views: 1,446
May I suggest fan cooling if you need it to run cooler? You don't need a lot of airflow to make a huge difference.

If this is "not by much", then what is...

Wrong graph. That is for horizontal fins and vertical baseplate, the orientation that is indeed a bad performer. Here is the graph for vertical fins/horizontal baseplate, like shown in the picture:
 

Attachments

  • correct graph.png
    correct graph.png
    24.9 KB · Views: 1,130
Last edited:
even being less effective, horisontal oriented finns may make up for some of the loss by improved horisontal spread of heat

Im certain horisontal upwards curved finning would be the absolute winner
 

Attachments

  • Heatsink curved finns.JPG
    Heatsink curved finns.JPG
    12.1 KB · Views: 993
I agree that the mounting of the output devices are not optimal but there are other contraints - like the shape & size of the mountable surfaces.

First at all, I did not pay for the heatsink, they are recycled parts from a computer power supply. I have nine of these heatsinks so they are perfect for prototyping.

The base of the heatsink is not flat so I could not mount the output devices there.

If the amplfilier is good enough to be cased, the original computer power supply case can also serve as a good monoblock case.

I have attached pictures of my first DIY project - a LM3886 kit from eBay with DIY PSU board - it shows the look of the monoblock amplifier.


Cheers, Stanley

Hi, have you missplaced the 220pF?

Check this image, red dots mark the right position.
 

Attachments

  • 1da9cd9f.jpg
    1da9cd9f.jpg
    69.2 KB · Views: 429