I've gotten to that point where I realize I only understand enough to know that this is not something I'm going to be able to figure out on my own - I've spent the last few weeks digging through information and reading.
I would like to try regulated power on the SuperSymmetry chip-amp I'm working up. I'm using two LM4780 chips per channel which should have a 10-15A capable supply. These will be monoblocks.
Worst case, I'll build it without regulation.
However, I would very much like to try a regulated supply.
The LM338 datasheet has a couple outlined, but they use obsolete chips in the circuit or are not recommended for more than 25V at best (though, I am not entirely clear where that voltage limit is being derived).
One of the things that has crossed my mind would be to supply each chip with its own regulator and not have a common power source (though I would still use one transformer and one rectifier bridge, and thus one capacitor bank behind the regulators). But I don't know if this is a good idea.
Other ideas and options are welcome.
Thanks!
C
I would like to try regulated power on the SuperSymmetry chip-amp I'm working up. I'm using two LM4780 chips per channel which should have a 10-15A capable supply. These will be monoblocks.
Worst case, I'll build it without regulation.
However, I would very much like to try a regulated supply.The LM338 datasheet has a couple outlined, but they use obsolete chips in the circuit or are not recommended for more than 25V at best (though, I am not entirely clear where that voltage limit is being derived).
One of the things that has crossed my mind would be to supply each chip with its own regulator and not have a common power source (though I would still use one transformer and one rectifier bridge, and thus one capacitor bank behind the regulators). But I don't know if this is a good idea.
Other ideas and options are welcome.
Thanks!
C
You can parrallel LT1083s without using an opamp, just 2 feet of 18g wire as ballast on each one (how do you make that look nice, i do not know )
http://www.linear.com/pc/downloadDocument.do?navId=H0,C1,C1003,C1040,C1055,P1281,D3741
on page 12
that resistor with the arrow pointing to the chips output means that the resistor must be physically connected as close as possible to that pin.
that chip is a bit harder to find and more expensive than a 338.
)http://www.linear.com/pc/downloadDocument.do?navId=H0,C1,C1003,C1040,C1055,P1281,D3741
on page 12
that resistor with the arrow pointing to the chips output means that the resistor must be physically connected as close as possible to that pin.
that chip is a bit harder to find and more expensive than a 338.
Because it's easyer to get the LM338 regulator chip, here's the schematic of paralleling three items to get a 15A voltage supply from the original datasheet :LM138/338 Datasheet
Attachments
Are you bridging the chips?
I'm having the same dilemma. If you are bridging
you should be able to use one set of lm338 per chip.
If you are paralleling them then the V of the power supplies should
be close to each other.
I'm planning to do this by using 0.1% resistor and using
a trim pot to get the voltages within a few mV.
I don't know if this works but I don't see why not.
Harry
I'm having the same dilemma. If you are bridging
you should be able to use one set of lm338 per chip.
If you are paralleling them then the V of the power supplies should
be close to each other.
I'm planning to do this by using 0.1% resistor and using
a trim pot to get the voltages within a few mV.
I don't know if this works but I don't see why not.
Harry
if you must, use an external pass transistor with the LM338 (National has the details on their site) -- much less expensive than paralleling multiple discrete regulators -- you can also use a much less expensive regulator -- like an LM317 with an external pass device -- the approximate current that the "regulator" will have to bear is just the base drive (something approximating the output current by the beta of the pass transistor). the LM317 is less expensive than the LM338 and may be less noisy (although each device can be "cleaned up" if you read the application note by Wenzel Associates.)
be advised that you are adding another feedback loop into your circuitry when you "regulate" -- "not necessarily a good thing" to paraphrase Martha Stewart with her orange jumper and ankle bracelet.
be advised that you are adding another feedback loop into your circuitry when you "regulate" -- "not necessarily a good thing" to paraphrase Martha Stewart with her orange jumper and ankle bracelet.
slackman said:
Do you really want 15A capacity? Remember that an unregulated supply has basically zero Amps capacity except for the capacitors at the supply output. The amp runs on those caps except for the 20% of the time that the diodes conduct to recharge the caps and supply the amp if necessary.
So a very efficient regulated setup would be say one 338 with 5A capacity with say 10.000 uF of capacitance at the output. The amp will run 95% of the time on the regulated supply, and when you really need very high output pulses for bass drums etc the caps will provide that. A full 15A or more supply is a prime example of overkill.
Jan Didden
janneman said:
Jan, I'm using 2,200uf on the LM3886 chips (after the LM338 regs).
This works very well.
But 10,000uf can kill a regulator at power-on, no?
Anyway, I think that the regs are fast enough to keep up with the demands, and 2,200uf seems ok.
They need some capacitance before them and around 10V difference between input and output so that they can regulate in the most demanding conditions, even accounting with some voltage sag (in this case they can give 12A peak current).
cjd, the LM338 regs can regulate at much higher voltages.
The limitation is the input to output voltage differential, not the regulated voltage.
PS: I would not parallel regulators. Better use a pass transistor.
carlosfm said:
I knew the 338's could regulate high voltages - the one example from the data-sheet that was posted here suggests 25V max, which I assumed was not due to the 338 but something else in the circuit. But, being unsure of WHAT is causing the 25V limit (if it's even a fair limit), and not really enjoying the thought of blowing something up in discovery, I decided it was better to admit my lack of knowledge and ask.
Pass transistor gives me something to look into. A couple of you have mentioned this and it seems to make sense if I understand the concept correctly. Now I just get to figure out how to actually implement it.
janneman: I don't need 15A probably, though it never hurts to have more capacity than needed. 5A seems to me to be too little though, even though I may never use it. The fact that the chips *could* draw more than 5A though...
C
Is 5A/7A/12A going to never have problems supplying power to two LM4780 chips?
(do you now have to ask "how loud do you play"? )
I'm actually having trouble finding documentation that explains anything enough (for me, given my level of understanding) regarding an external pass transistor. I can probably put the basic circuit together, just can't tell what parts go where. As if that's importnant.
C
(do you now have to ask "how loud do you play"?
)I'm actually having trouble finding documentation that explains anything enough (for me, given my level of understanding) regarding an external pass transistor. I can probably put the basic circuit together, just can't tell what parts go where. As if that's importnant.
C
cjd said:
We are powering an amp, not an industrial welder! Music has an average to peak ratio of, what 10%? 2%? The vast majority of the time you are listening to just a few watts.
The 338 seems to be able to supply up to 7 amps short term. Assuming dual supplies, that's 5A RMS. Assuming, again, 4 ohms load, that means that a simple 338 without anything else can supply this amp up to a level of 100 watts. ONLY with peak loudness above 100W equivalent, the capacitors would need to come in to help the reg. I would be very surprised if that is 1 sec per day. If your amp is able to output 100W or more, which it probably isn't.
And yes, it can hurt to have more then necessary. Paralleling 338's or using pass transistors will degrade the performance of the total reg package in terms of either dynamic Zout or stability or both. And that will influence the sound 100% of the time.
Jan Didden
Re: poweramp regulated supply
Elso, that is your experience with your amps and PSUs.
In my experience with regulated PSU and these chips, it's the most impressive bass slam I have heard out of them.
But notice that I use 2,200uf caps after the regs, and the PSU is not so conventional.
It is fully snubberized, which makes a whole of a difference.
Elso Kwak said:
Elso, that is your experience with your amps and PSUs.
In my experience with regulated PSU and these chips, it's the most impressive bass slam I have heard out of them.
But notice that I use 2,200uf caps after the regs, and the PSU is not so conventional.
It is fully snubberized, which makes a whole of a difference.
Re: Re: poweramp regulated supply
Please don't snubber to me!
carlosfm said:Elso, that is your experience with your amps and PSUs.
In my experience with regulated PSU and these chips, it's the most impressive bass slam I have heard out of them.
But notice that I use 2,200uf caps after the regs, and the PSU is not so conventional.
It is fully snubberized, which makes a whole of a difference.
Please don't snubber to me!
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.