The dome midrange thread

I want to use a 3" dome in a large WG.

I want to integrate two of the M74A with a T34B in MTM and TMM into the enclosure baffle. I wish I had a CNC option for this. The transition to a large cone driver would be so easy and the offset depth would integrate nicely for time alignment.
This caught my attention, as now that I have the M74Ts in hand I am thinking about the next step. I have been planning along the lines of using them as direct radiators but have been intrigued by the idea of using them and the T34Bs both in WGs (sort of like a K+H 420 as an example). I have mostly let it go as I think they would do well as direct radiators, I don't have the skills to design the WG, and I think removing the grill of the M74 drivers has potential downsides/maybe they have to be ordered from the factory to enable this(?).

But it sure is an appealing idea...

Bill
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arez
Ouch, that is a lot more than I paired and mine came matched with the waveguide.

From what I heard though....... they are worth every penny of even that inflated price. I am talking about out of EVERY ultra high end system I heard, these domes blow them all away. I think just about every commercially available driver was being utilized somewhere in that convention. Plus a lot of bespoke drivers. This would stood out head and shoulders above the rest.


I would suggest not buying until I have measurements. Not that the measurments really matter to me at this point. I know what they sound like. That said, it will be interesting to see the distortion. It might have super high H2 and maybe that is what I like. Time to link distortion plots to my preferences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IamJF, Zvu and Arez
Oh no, I'm not pushing for duplicating the WG. I respect that more than anyone as I had a patent ripped off several years back. The dome is a 2" type, so its not that big compared to the 3" SS or Bliesma. I just wanted to identify the manufacturer of the dome itself. WGs can be engineered and figured out. I want to use a 3" dome in a large WG.

I want to integrate two of the M74A with a T34B in MTM and TMM into the enclosure baffle. I wish I had a CNC option for this. The transition to a large cone driver would be so easy and the offset depth would integrate nicely for time alignment.
I will have CNC available in a couple of months and what you speak of sounds very interesting!

I am based in Sweden however so integrated into baffle might lead to prohibitive shipping costs.. the cnc will be capable of aluminium though so a compromise would be a "mini baffle" in aluminium housing the 3 bliesma drivers that can be later incorporated into the larger baffle.

If you were to produce such a design i would be able to machine it for both of us and send you a pair for the cost of shipping and raw materials only.

I could of course be able to machine a complete baffle aswell if shipping would work out reasonably.

Cnc will have a work area of 1275x1275mm
 
@Bmsluite High H2 will show itself in looking at the difference of close range FR to further back. There will be a rising response from further back. Besides, its not a deal breaker my any means, only if you're using the driver for critical monitoring applications, not to embellish the mids. For consumer use, it only helps (to a point).
 
I measure the impedence. I have been prepping for a big fishing trip for the last week so I didn't have time after work to take FR measurements. I only took this to try out the new DATS V3. Dats is ******* awesome. 30 seconds you have ZMA and TS parameters.

So are the wavecor domes available for sale? The speaker designer told me it took him quite a while to figure out the waveguide configuration to get what he wanted out of them. I don't know that I would feel right about reverse engineering his work and sharing it with the world considering he did help me source these drivers.
View attachment 1463595
Best used between 700Hz and 3Khz.

Current drive it for the win!
 
Mid domes respond well to basic conical profiles if the mouth termination is smooth. The Bliesma drivers are all wide directivity in their design and trying to reduce that directivity significantly with a waveguide seems counterproductive. I don't think there is any need to remove the protective screen to have a waveguide function as the inbuilt waveguide lip mates to a conical profile without any apparent issue in simulation. Unless the reason to do so is to keep the CTC low which is the opposite of what most waveguides will do.

Screenshot 2025-05-24 at 6.17.50 pm.png
 
I've found that even from the manufacturer the alignment can be off considerably.
😳 Do you see this in THD measurements? With the ones I used these where very consistent. I have one T74S sample, maybe I give it a try with this one.

The price is eyewatering, but for making a WG to fit the driver these have a excellent starting point, 75mm soft dome.
Meant as substitution for the lack of ATC supply, used from 380hz ->.
From the same page as before:

https://www.avitech.at/en/startseite/995-pmc-ersatz-mitteltoener.html
Crazy. And when it's the Volt version you won't get the 380Hz cross over frequency.
You can use 2 nice M74x in a .5 configuration and be superior in every way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: profiguy
@IamJF On one of the four M74A I had to fuss with (loose front ring from insufficiently clamping, bottomed out screws), 3rd order HD was elevated than the rest. I had to center the VC with a 400 hz sine. The HD dropped considerably (0.4 - 0.25%), but the other three were only trivially improved. Using the speced Fs guaranteed exciting a slight wobble mode in the dome at about 4V drive. Almost every big dome suffers from a similar issue, which is why I always measure a new mid with 4V sweeps.
 
And don't let anyone tell you that dome drivers with single suspensions don't suffer from wobble modes or aren't even negatively effected by these non-linear resonance modes. Every single surround dome I've come across can be pushed into a wobble mode of some kind. It can show itself as a tipping motion or a combination of tilt and radial wobble (like a plate being set down unevenly on a table top, gradually wobbling itself to a standstill). This is why an LCR notch at Fs is important for any single suspension dome driver being crossed very low around that range.
 
Mid domes respond well to basic conical profiles if the mouth termination is smooth. The Bliesma drivers are all wide directivity in their design and trying to reduce that directivity significantly with a waveguide seems counterproductive. I don't think there is any need to remove the protective screen to have a waveguide function as the inbuilt waveguide lip mates to a conical profile without any apparent issue in simulation. Unless the reason to do so is to keep the CTC low which is the opposite of what most waveguides will do.

View attachment 1464315
Is there such a waveguide for M74B?
 
@LewinskiH01 I'm not aware of any refined WG designs for the M74A. Here's a link to someone who's trying something similar, but more like the Neumann setup.

 
Is there such a waveguide for M74B?
The profile exists but I have not made it into an STL that can be printed. There is a fair bit of time and effort involved in turning a simulated idea into a printable model that fits properly on the actual driver and can be mounted in a sensible way. I haven't and don't intend to do that, but if someone else wants to I will provide the profile as a base to use, like I did for the T25A waveguide. The full surface is elliptical but in that configuration the vertical directivity narrows quite early, the horizontal as shown above could be used all the way round, the vertical and horizontal would then be equal but the CTC distances would increase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryguy
The idea comes up every now and then. There have been people who listened via the opening where the horn would attach, i.e. through the 1', 1.4", or 2" opening. One guy loved it. That never seemed to make as much sense to me as removing the back cover such that you are looking at and listening to the convex side. The problem that is always pointed out is the minuscule Xmax of compression drivers. Regardless, it would be interesting to see a good set of measurements.

Bill