Rate my filtering

The sharp peaks at 3.75 ms, 4.6 ms and maybe also at 4.1 ms look a bit funky. What are they? Reflections?

1747496894605.png
 
I don’t think the peaks should be problematic when designing a crossover. They are however to assess the system and/or components.

You ask us to rate the crossover. I’d say you don’t need the notch on the woofer coil nor the zobel (?) on the tweeter.

The proof of the pudding of course is in the eating. Build the crossover and measure the system. Then rate it yourself, I guess…
 
Regarding Filter:
I assume you are using LR4 crossovers, given the DEEP reverse null. LR4 gives a bump in the power response at the crossover but provides good phase matching. As I know you are interested in smooth power and in-room response, try 3rd order crossovers (Butterworth or Linkwitz-Riley). Simulate and save the different variations of 3rd order using xo points of 2000, 2400, 2800, and 3200. Now compare the Power and PIR and see which ones are getting you the best results, pick the one you like best and tweak from there. Note, however, you will not get a deep reverse null, but you can keep an eye on the phase of the individual drivers near the crossover point.

Measurements:
You have received a lot of feedback on your measurements because it "looks" like there may be issues. One way to check...wire up one of your crossovers, make sure all of the inductor DCR's are correct in VituixCAD, measure at 2m, and load the FRD into VituixCAD as an overlay. VituixCAD is very good IF you give it good inputs. If everything is good, you should be within about 0.5dB or less, between your measurement and your simulation, 20kHz down to 300Hz or so.

If things do NOT match well, then it is your measurements. If that ends up being the case, you should start a thread about the measurements and tell us more about the baffle dimensions, mic, REW settings, etc.