So if I program York as 3 channels I2S stream, then standard Windows drivers will detect York as 5.1 sound card?
Another question, if I sometimes want to listen to a 2.1 stereo stream instead of 5.1, do I need to change the settings in Windows from 5.1 to stereo, or reprogram York? Will it be possible to switch from 5.1 to 2.1 under Windows without problems? Or does Windows not support the 2.1 configuration?
Now it will be seen as just 2/4/8 channel. To tell windows the exact configuration (3.1/5.1/7.1) a modification of USB descriptor is required. I have plan to do so but it is not there yet.
It depends on the software, sometimes it is possible to override "global" settings in windows inside the app. If you're up to do some experiments, I'll send you Nano board, I think it would fit into your DSP amplifier project. Please send me PM with address.
A new firmware is available:
v4.7 build 2434 (28 April 2025)
Bug fix: Mute signal in multichannel mode
v4.6 build 2424 (27 April 2025)
Bug fix: I2S input channel swap in slave mode
Please use latest config tool for update.
v4.7 build 2434 (28 April 2025)
Bug fix: Mute signal in multichannel mode
v4.6 build 2424 (27 April 2025)
Bug fix: I2S input channel swap in slave mode
Please use latest config tool for update.
In relation to York, just sugestion! 2.54 pins and I2S is not an good option in my opinion, thats an antenna + pickup antenna. And if possible an miniature board like esp32 or bluetooth module, something like this would be very good option for those who need things real modular in much smaller possible form = the better! That case users have choice to have miniature York and other to have miniature board + carier board whith size of current York, that way you have two options for selling and we have also two options for buying! In my case I not like the current size of the York and also not like those 2.54 pin headers. Just my sugestion for your further work on improving your York.
Attachments
Last edited:
There is a miniature version:
https://www.tindie.com/products/eclipsevl/york-nano-pic32mz-development-board/
It is still 2.54 but in smaller format. I was thinking of making this version with constellated holes, but it is too expensive for small batches.
https://www.tindie.com/products/eclipsevl/york-nano-pic32mz-development-board/
It is still 2.54 but in smaller format. I was thinking of making this version with constellated holes, but it is too expensive for small batches.
Yes but the issue is not related to paneling.
The constellated holes option triggers more expensive assembly option. And just because of that manufacturing cost for batch of 25 boards doubles (!)
The constellated holes option triggers more expensive assembly option. And just because of that manufacturing cost for batch of 25 boards doubles (!)
You should use v-cut on the side that do not have holes, and make square pads with oval holes so that you cut the rest of panel yourself, that way I think it not cost twice?
If I understood you correctly, you propose to cut the boards after production to get kind of constellated holes.
In that case there will be issue with metallization - the existing metallization in the holes can be damaged and there will be no metallization on the edge of the board. This is the whole point of constellated holes option.