Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)

Currently simulating an asymmetrical 130 degree R-OSSE waveguide to be used with the Peerless DFM-2535 down to 1 kHz. I have some questions. Which R-OSSE operation or which combination of operators controlls the pattern with between 1-2 kHz? I am mostly satisfied with the device in general by now but would need to reduce vertical pattern width just above LF cut-off.
 
Last edited:
Is this good or bad? 🙂

It appears to be difficult to find criteria, let alone explanatios. In any case, this appears to be a common standard for studio monitors:

2.5 Decay time

The decay time ts is defined as the time taken for a reduction of the sound pressure to a value 1/e (about 0.37) times the initial value. A sinusoidal tone burst shall be used as an input signal.

The decay time should not exceed the following limit:
ts ≤ 2.5/f
where: f is the frequency.

EBU Tech. 3276 of the EBU Technical Recommendation R22-1999.

Less strict:

7.2.2.4 Transient fidelity

The decay time measured on an oscilloscope to a level of 1/e (approximately 0.37) of the original level, (on the main
axis only) should be:
ts < 5/f
where f: frequency.

That means the decay time of a sinusoidal tone burst may not exceed five times the period of the corresponding sine
wave.

Rec. ITU-R BS.1116-1

The latter is also the criterium of AESTD1001.1.01-10.
 
Last edited:
That sounds almost like a joke. Where do these numbers come from? 1/e, that's roughly -8.7 dB SPL.

It doesn't seem that strict though. With a smooth-enough frequency response, this is reasonable, IMO.
It's tau, or a time constant. It's a pretty standard way to describe decay rates in other engineering fields. You usually see it as 63% drop, and it's handy to work with when you're doing e^(-jwt) related math.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psytron
1724866006631.png
1724866086192.png


I'm testing a new idea of the assembly scheme. All simple, easy-to-print parts with some locks (which I've not decided how to do yet), so they can be easily added one by one in a straightforward way, including a complete dry run. And even if the seams remain apparent in the end, which they always tend to, in this case it could be still fine visually, I hope.
 
Last edited:
Is there a way to design a horn in ATH4 that is curved at the termination? I.e. to match a baffle curved in one dimension?

I assume I could just use ath4 to make the throat and conical section and then truncate it in Fusion 360? But then I would need to make my own curve for the termination.
 
Has anyone explored further designs using the superformula feature? I know there were some posts early on in the thread about it, but it seems like interest died off. It may be a dead end, but given that the complexity increases substantially once you add in the superformula variables, I've been using a genetic algorithm to improve on this style waveguide over a few hundred iterations. Drawing inspiration from @Patrick Bateman's extensive research on the image control waveguide. This one measures at 320x320x140mm with a 1" throat.

I've got a few other variations of this that I've printed and tested, but so far this one looks to be the most promising, so I'll start on a physical prototype next week.

jakehorn v3.png
jakehorn v2.png
quadminimeh20norm.png
quadminimehimp2.png

1725211248914.png