So, in other words, you can’t prove they’re not true but you assume they‘re false anyway.
I've not made it past reading the first and last page of this thread, which would seem to reflect the overall ignorance, arrogance, and lack of intellect I've encountered in this forum, and most audio related forums. It's always so beautiful to witness these IQ 100 apes with brains stuffed with useless data they can't properly interpret so certain in their superiority, when the most wise statement they could ever come up with is "I know I know nothing".
Gee, you seem to want to brag about your measured IQ!
Due to better prenatal care the average now is a bit above 105, using the old standards.
Pretty sure there are folks who participate here who are smarter than you!
But please list your IQ, list of peer reviewed published and cited papers, academic achievements and of course your self-earned net worth!
Oh almost forgot one of my favorites, your work that has been cited by others’ patent applications.
Due to better prenatal care the average now is a bit above 105, using the old standards.
Pretty sure there are folks who participate here who are smarter than you!
But please list your IQ, list of peer reviewed published and cited papers, academic achievements and of course your self-earned net worth!
Oh almost forgot one of my favorites, your work that has been cited by others’ patent applications.
This just in! External magnetic fields and their effects on humans, NIH paper, especially with respect to our old friend Schumann resonance. Now, we’re getting somewhere. Out Googling the Google Scientists. 🤗
Excerpt from NIH paper,
”In the late 1950s, Schumann and Koenig measured a set of frequencies consistent with the mathematical model predicting an earth-ionospheric cavity resonance [59]. The frequency of the first Schumann resonance (SR), as they are now named, is approximately 7.83 Hz, with a (day/night) variation of about ±0.5 Hz. The other SR frequencies are ~14, 20, 26, 33, 39, and 45 Hz, which closely overlap with human brainwaves, such as alpha (8–12 Hz), beta (12–30 Hz), and gamma (30–100 Hz). This similarity between the frequencies produced by the brain and the SRs and the tendency of the electroencephalogram rhythms to become synchronous with SR activity was first reported by Koenig [60]. Pobachenko et al. [61] monitored the SRs and EEGs of 15 individuals over a six week period, and found that variations in the EEG were correlated with changes in the SR across the daily cycle, and the largest correlations between the EEGs and SRs were during periods of higher magnetic activity. Persinger et al. have also studied EEG activity and the SR in real-time, and demonstrated that several of the SR frequencies are clearly found in the spectral profiles of human brain activity [62,63]. In their studies, they found that the power within the EEG spectral profiles had repeated periods of coherence with the first three SR resonance frequencies (7–8 Hz, 13–14 Hz, and 19–20 Hz) in real-time. This suggests that changes in the SR parameters are related to changes in the solar wind, and that solar radiation can affect brain activity, including modulations in cognition and memory consolidation [63].”
Synchronization of Human Autonomic Nervous System Rhythms with Geomagnetic Activity in Human Subjects
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5551208/Excerpt from NIH paper,
”In the late 1950s, Schumann and Koenig measured a set of frequencies consistent with the mathematical model predicting an earth-ionospheric cavity resonance [59]. The frequency of the first Schumann resonance (SR), as they are now named, is approximately 7.83 Hz, with a (day/night) variation of about ±0.5 Hz. The other SR frequencies are ~14, 20, 26, 33, 39, and 45 Hz, which closely overlap with human brainwaves, such as alpha (8–12 Hz), beta (12–30 Hz), and gamma (30–100 Hz). This similarity between the frequencies produced by the brain and the SRs and the tendency of the electroencephalogram rhythms to become synchronous with SR activity was first reported by Koenig [60]. Pobachenko et al. [61] monitored the SRs and EEGs of 15 individuals over a six week period, and found that variations in the EEG were correlated with changes in the SR across the daily cycle, and the largest correlations between the EEGs and SRs were during periods of higher magnetic activity. Persinger et al. have also studied EEG activity and the SR in real-time, and demonstrated that several of the SR frequencies are clearly found in the spectral profiles of human brain activity [62,63]. In their studies, they found that the power within the EEG spectral profiles had repeated periods of coherence with the first three SR resonance frequencies (7–8 Hz, 13–14 Hz, and 19–20 Hz) in real-time. This suggests that changes in the SR parameters are related to changes in the solar wind, and that solar radiation can affect brain activity, including modulations in cognition and memory consolidation [63].”
Last edited:
Schumann frequency may inhibit cancer cell growth. Bingo!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30889982/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30889982/
Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on B16F10 cancer cells
Abstract
This paper presents a method to inhibit B16F10 cancer cells using extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) and to evaluate cell viability using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay. The study examined the effect of a natural EMF resonance frequency (7.83 Hz) and a power line frequency (60 Hz) on B16F10 cancer cells for 24 and 48 h. The B16F10 cancer cells were also exposed to sweep frequencies in several sweep intervals to quantitatively analyze the viability of cancer cells. The results yielded a 17% inhibition rate under 7.83 Hz compared with that of the control group. Moreover, sweep frequencies in narrow intervals (7.83 ± 0.1 Hz for the step 0.05 Hz) caused an inhibition rate of 26.4%, and inhibitory effects decreased as frequency sweep intervals increased. These results indicate that a Schumann resonance frequency of 7.83 Hz can inhibit the growth of cancer cells and that using a specific frequency type can lead to more effective growth inhibition
And due to the large wavelength it cures also all your other cells and neighborhood 
, as your dog, the girl nextdoor and the soldier that shoots in the next trench ! How democratic
There is a good and simple way to grossly estimate terristrians IQ :
, as your dog, the girl nextdoor and the soldier that shoots in the next trench ! How democratic There is a good and simple way to grossly estimate terristrians IQ :
- you believe in extrateristrian UFO : <80
- you doubt : > 80 to < 100
- you know it's BS because you switched on your brain to think ot it 5 minutes : > 100 to < 130
Too much datas... A question or two remain: are UFOs are in fact exploding X protos of Starchimp ? And does Elon smell musk ?
Note that you can be also septik when paradigms produce concrete and existing things like the quantum and the relativity that do not merge but are real science in each on their own corpus. Here we need to ask about ourselves and environment of perception which may not be universal (post Newton perception) or the whole truth. (And already we have to ask if only a truth can only exist in our own field, see Kant for instance that limits the knowledge on an elegant and acurate way)
So we always have to define limits in science, i.e. windowing the knowledge. Which all scientis having a good enough epistomology education is knowing. (Alas not all,some involve deities and so on, mixing all together like a badknwoledge soup)
"Scientific claims" is what does not work in the sentence, or at least it doesn't need the rest of the phrase
But at least if experiment is how science is verified (and what is Science), we should not forget it is staying a paradigm since better descriptions and experiments corpus that go further.
However it seems almost subttle when you se some people enter with the two feets in magic thinking and being influenced by the group phenomem. Tipically the Orson Welles effect, known as collective hysteria that have well known illustration in the History field since writting exists (and in a certain approximation before if you studdy the field of art and symbolic before that, in the prehistory field ).
At the end, there is no doubt that the foundation of an acurate knwoledge has its building of what can be checked as being universal and not stand on cultural opinions. It is all the beauty of what Science is !
The beauty is not about aesthetical, it says just you the whole truth, being confortable or not for you. It is the opposite of superstition.
Relative to the topic, the association of non identified flying object and non terrestrian origin is a superstitution as early some highligthed !
Last edited:
Well you know perfectly, an hypothesis is a non tested theory. It is how things progress and give platforms to better ideas that have more chances to work. (an people need to exist and justiofy their incomes, etc ... poor world). An hypothesis can be everything from the shadows of the cavern to somethings more refined. It is not because it is refined it is true (of course). But people like shorcuts and digest informations shorter and shorter, mixing quantity with quallity. We know it. It is a business.
Indeed it is a pain, and I see it often, that yet many people in the technical environment have not that basic understanding. Luckilly not all, of course. Often relative to the quality of your studies or post oneself continuoous education.
What to say about the majority of people ? Well, we see Education have some challlenges to take, and things like wokism and populism are worrying. People like formulas as they like hypothesis, i.e. already digested simple food that have zero nutritive valor. I am very worried when I see it is touching some big universities/colleges and well knwon newspapers in western countries where we have more requirements than everywhere.
And already, you see big mouths and nepostism have some future
Indeed it is a pain, and I see it often, that yet many people in the technical environment have not that basic understanding. Luckilly not all, of course. Often relative to the quality of your studies or post oneself continuoous education.
What to say about the majority of people ? Well, we see Education have some challlenges to take, and things like wokism and populism are worrying. People like formulas as they like hypothesis, i.e. already digested simple food that have zero nutritive valor. I am very worried when I see it is touching some big universities/colleges and well knwon newspapers in western countries where we have more requirements than everywhere.
And already, you see big mouths and nepostism have some future
Last edited:
You mean: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdimensional_UFO_hypothesis
Or perhaps it's time travelling humans known as 'extratempestrials'?
Although, that is a highly dubious claim!
Or perhaps it's time travelling humans known as 'extratempestrials'?
Although, that is a highly dubious claim!