F6 Illustrated Build Guide

Attachments

  • F6 labelled resistors.png
    F6 labelled resistors.png
    243.7 KB · Views: 130
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: freebee
Have visually inspected the resistors and all seem fine. Remember looking at both DMMs and, without changing the trim pots, the offset was completely off (way too high). Bizarre as the amp was working fine before remeasuring the bias and offset. Before I measured bias in Mv instead of ampere. Teaches me to stop fiddling when things are working.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220730_113040.jpg
    IMG_20220730_113040.jpg
    354.5 KB · Views: 96
I desoldered K170 and got the following measurements with an Atlas DCA75 Pro as seen in the photos:
Can anyone confirm this makes sense?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220730_124702.jpg
    IMG_20220730_124702.jpg
    303 KB · Views: 91
  • IMG_20220730_124709.jpg
    IMG_20220730_124709.jpg
    293 KB · Views: 96
  • IMG_20220730_124730.jpg
    IMG_20220730_124730.jpg
    349.9 KB · Views: 94
I also pulled one of the irfp 150 MOSFETs and it measures as follows:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220730_135943.jpg
    IMG_20220730_135943.jpg
    363.3 KB · Views: 81
  • IMG_20220730_135951.jpg
    IMG_20220730_135951.jpg
    286.3 KB · Views: 86
  • IMG_20220730_135956.jpg
    IMG_20220730_135956.jpg
    348.4 KB · Views: 82
  • IMG_20220730_140002.jpg
    IMG_20220730_140002.jpg
    304.7 KB · Views: 77
  • IMG_20220730_140009.jpg
    IMG_20220730_140009.jpg
    347.1 KB · Views: 85
If you were attempting to measure the bias across one of the source resistors with your DMM set to measure current, what you've effectively done is put another low-resistance path in place of the source resistor. Your DMM manual should tell you the value, but it's not too relevant. Given that the source resistors are 0R47 and 0R56 ... although you saw / smelt smoke, you may not have hurt much given that you likely did not change the current through the associated part 'dramatically'. I'd first check the output MOSFET directly associated with the resistor you were measuring across. It may measure OK on something like your Peak. However, I'd inspect the back of the part for visual thermal damage. If you have another pair of output devices, it couldn't hurt to swap them, particularly since you've already got the board out and one part removed.

My $0.02, and I'm sure I've likely missed something, or that I could be dead wrong. However, that's where I'd start the path to verification and a bit of the logic behind it.

Good luck!!!

BTW - if you have a DBT and/or a Variac, now may be the perfect time to back the bias back off and slowly ramp back up while taking a few measurements to check operation. You may have gotten pretty lucky and just heated up a part a bit too much w/o killing it. They're fairly robust. Also, if your amp is properly fused, you'd likely have blown a fuse before too much could go haywire unless you were quick, quick, quick to turn it off.
 
If you were attempting to measure the bias across one of the source resistors with your DMM set to measure current, what you've effectively done is put another low-resistance path in place of the source resistor. Your DMM manual should tell you the value, but it's not too relevant. Given that the source resistors are 0R47 and 0R56 ... although you saw / smelt smoke, you may not have hurt much given that you likely did not change the current through the associated part 'dramatically'. I'd first check the output MOSFET directly associated with the resistor you were measuring across. It may measure OK on something like your Peak. However, I'd inspect the back of the part for visual thermal damage. If you have another pair of output devices, it couldn't hurt to swap them, particularly since you've already got the board out and one part removed.

My $0.02, and I'm sure I've likely missed something, or that I could be dead wrong. However, that's where I'd start the path to verification and a bit of the logic behind it.

Good luck!!!

BTW - if you have a DBT and/or a Variac, now may be the perfect time to back the bias back off and slowly ramp back up while taking a few measurements to check operation. You may have gotten pretty lucky and just heated up a part a bit too much w/o killing it. They're fairly robust. Also, if your amp is properly fused, you'd likely have blown a fuse before too much could go haywire unless you were quick, quick, quick to turn it off.

I've measured the second IRFP150 and it measures practically the same as the other (see photos).

Should I just order 2 new ones or just use them? Also, should I replace the MOSFETs on the other board as well (they might match better if from the same batch)
 

Attachments

  • 16592805721481786485216606202425.jpg
    16592805721481786485216606202425.jpg
    344.9 KB · Views: 83
  • 16592805978515427355689900827321.jpg
    16592805978515427355689900827321.jpg
    371.8 KB · Views: 80
  • 16592806188094650953496975058781.jpg
    16592806188094650953496975058781.jpg
    376.9 KB · Views: 85
  • 1659280643806437908947134549407.jpg
    1659280643806437908947134549407.jpg
    372.7 KB · Views: 81
  • 16592806629984896779592061192144.jpg
    16592806629984896779592061192144.jpg
    341.8 KB · Views: 73
First power them up and see if you can set bias and offset.

If not, then, yes, something is toast.

2nd, if they bias up fine, hook the o-scope up to the binding posts for the possibly offensive channel. Feed the channel a 1kHz sine wave and see how it looks on the scope.

If 2nd worked, then try it hooked up to a load to see how the current delivery is holding up. A non-reactive 8ohm dummy load would be better but can use your speaker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freebee