• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Western Electric assessing possibility of again producing tubes

Isn't the elephant in the room the danger that at some point inefficient tubes will pop up on some environmental radar and be outlawed in one fell swoop, à la ROHS? Chrome bumpers/catalysts/... on cars? Filament lightbulbs?

There was an April Fool's to that effect i saw some years ago, but it was quite credible unfortunately.

My son has just bought himself a box he plugs between his guitar and a solid state amp, and supposedly it will emulate all sorts of tube amplifiers. Are tubes an anachronism?
 
Might be part of a broader proposal that may ban non-switching amplifiers, or amplifiers over 10 watts in general. There may be different rules for commercial vs. home use. Commercial sector may be forced to go class D first, followed by everybody else. Perhaps power limits so they can “target” people making too much noise. Where there is loud obnoxious music, there is often other contraband.

I can lock my tubes in a gun safe, and have a rack or two full of illegal amplifiers behind a false wall.
 
Still plenty of old "classic" cars putting around on the weekends, spewing out clouds of smoke. Any efficiency ban would take the form of regulations on new production tubes. Since it has been possible to make heater-less tubes since 1991, using thin film tunneling cathodes (not the unreliable sharp point emitter cathodes you usually hear about), I don't see any issue with tube efficiency restrictions at all. Tube manufacturers would simply be forced to upgrade to superior known tube construction technique. The likely problem would be sales quantity dropping off with tubes that last way longer. But then, whoever does it first would probably corner the whole market for guitar Amps.
 
Last edited:
The thin film monolithic cathodes have good current density, good enough to make an OTL type tube. Tubes like Mosfets.

The 1st thin film cathode versions could be made with just electroplating of titanium over nickel (in solution). The later ones were multi-layer made by deposition in vacuum (reaching full room temperature emission). That was back in the late nineties. Been 20 years since then, could be amazing stuff available now. Physics World, October 2000, page 25 to 26 or Physical Review Letters 2000 Vol. 85 page 864.
"Two scientists, Vu Thien Binh and Christophe Adessi, have solved the problem of a room temperature thermionic emitter 50 years too late"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kodabmx
Any efficiency ban would take the form of regulations on new production tubes. Since it has been possible to make heater-less tubes since 1991, using thin film tunneling cathodes (not the unreliable sharp point emitter cathodes you usually hear about), I don't see any issue with tube efficiency restrictions at all.
Even if you got rid of the wasted heater power it wouldn’t make an “Energy Star” rating. Some of the class D commercial stuff does - it’s only a matter of time before it becomes mandatory.
 
Tubes/Valves are a very regional thing.

Smoking Amp says "who cares about Russian/Soviet tubes?" Is it sarcasm? I don't know

Well for me, yes I do care, and no I don't care for US tubes either....

I'd much rather find some nice Phillips, TFK, Mazda, Marconi....

But it would be nice for WE to make more, but I would likely not see them anyway, and certainly not pay the premium PSVane type price tags
 
  • Like
Reactions: kodabmx