Schade Common Gate (SCG) Preamp

ra7

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Lot of updates have happened. Version 2.0 PCB has been made and group buy completed. All PCBs sold, but if you want one, PM me.

Latest schematic and build docs
Test PCB Image
Power up procedure
Distortion measurements
Gain calculations
Part I Upgrade to original design
_____________________
Original Post

Introducing the Schade Common Gate (SCG) Preamp. Signal comes in at the bottom source follower (unity voltage gain) and is then amplified by the Schade-enabled top MOSFET operated in a common gate configuration. This gets around the problem of low impedance on the gate of the Schade device.

IMG_5522.JPG

Note: the schematics and information presented here is for personal and DIY use only and NOT for commercial use. Any other use needs my permission.

Inspiration came from George (tubelab) and Smoking-Amp, who were exploring the source-follower to common gate configuration for tube pentodes. I made a comment here that you could do this with MOSFETs too. Wrenchone and others have explored the Schade idea and Papa himself posted that really elegant Schade-enabled amplifier where the feedback connection is on the primary of the transformer to get around the problem of input impedance. I really like simplicity and elegance this circuit provides.

Here’s some of the pros of this approach:

  • Gain device operates in triode mode.
  • Low parts count.
  • No unobtanium transistors or tubes.
  • Low cost.
  • No cap on the input.
  • High input impedance and low output impedance (though I haven’t measured this yet).
  • Preserves the phase: the source follow and common gate stages both preserve phase.
I built the resistor-loaded circuit and also a CCS loaded one (next post). It sounds excellent. It has the negative phase H2 (blue goes down when red goes up and blue goes down when red goes down), which really brings out the magic. Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve compared it to my other preamps, the 801a and the LuminAria, and it is comparable in sound.

Here are some measurements of the resistor-loaded version. I haven’t played with the load line much, but raising the load from 500R to 1k does improve things. The CCS version has almost no distortion. Subjectively though, I prefer the resistor-loaded version, it has much more of that 3D and “live” sound of LuminAria.

The build is a rats nest right now. Used the existing LuminAria setup with the Salas shunt reg. Hope to put it in its own box.

SCG_FR.jpg


SCG_Rload_Distortion_1.3VrmsOut.jpg


H2_Phase.JPG


IMG_5519.JPG
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

ra7

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
CCS Version
The CCS-loaded version’s performance is out of this world for a single gain transistor. Subjectively, it sounds very sweet and clean, but somewhat recessed. On loud symphonic pieces and rock music, it sounds better, but on quieter stuff, it doesn’t quite have the presence and 3D-ness of the resistor-loaded version. This is kind of an amazing subjective result and shows that we (or at least me) probably want quite a bit of that negative phase H2.

The CCS is formed a pair of DN2540s that produce an extremely stable CCS. It is rock steady no matter what is happening in the rest of the circuit. The other benefit of the CCS is that you can set the current independently of the Vds on the gain MOSFET. It lets you explore a range of operating points. My power supply is a Salas Shunt Reg and I am limited to about 40 mA because of the shunt reg capability. There are probably other, better operating points elsewhere. See post below about the Schade/triode curves.

IMG_5521.JPG


SCG_CCS_Load_Right_Distortion_1.3VrmsOut.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

ra7

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Curves
Got some curves from the composite device including the 10k and 1k resistors using Mike’s Frankentracer. I wanted to see how the Vgs values and curves looked in the 0-100 mA and 0-100 V region. Not having the Tek scope, I used the ‘very poor man’s curve tracer’ and tried to draw by hand the curves I was seeing on the scope. Please excuse the drawing, the point was to try and see what was happening. It is pretty linear everywhere but there is quite a bit of ‘slop’ with increasing Vds. For the preamp, I tried various Vds points between 30 V and 95 V at about 35 mA and got the about the same results. But there may be other points and the loadline itself that you can play with.

All said and done, pretty good emulation of a triode.

IMG_5512.JPG


IMG_5506.JPG


IMG_5505.JPG
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
considering that Iq/biasing is set either with resistor or CCS, feel free to play with Schade resistor values, thus changing transfer function by your liking

also - voltage potential for upper mosfet - I prefer it firm as possible, at least in AC domain ....... meaning - I believe it is good having decent elco across 10K trimpot

in my shenanigans (difference - not line stages) , I did found 750R and 18K as nice Schade combo ......
 

ra7

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Thanks ZM!
I will try the bypass of the 10k pot. That would put the gate at ground for AC. Good idea.

Playing with the Schade feedback values—interesting. Will try that also. Will plot the curves first to see what different combos do.
 
Member
Joined 2002
Paid Member
This really looks like fun. Thanks for sharing.

It's interesting that you find a bit more magic in the resistor-loaded version even though the CCS is objectively 'better'.

Just want to confirm: Are the mosfets are fqp19n20 and fqp12p20? (Bad eyes so I can't tell if they are TO-220 parts)

Cheers,
Dennis
 

ra7

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Yes, that’s correct Dennis! They are TO-220 parts and the FQP ones, left over from past projects. Anybody who’s built an F5 or a BA-3 has them ;)

Yes, I was surprised by the result. The CCS sounds good but kind of recessed and sterile. The resistor loaded one sounds more 3D and live. In my experiments with the tube preamps and LuminAria, the ones with just H2 and nothing else have the most outstanding sound. My conclusion is that you can tolerate quite a bit of negative phase H2 and may even want more of it than we think. Of course, as the music gets complicated and high in level, you don’t want that all extra H2. Somehow the Sony devices manage this trick very well.
 
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
you can always combine good thing of having CCS up (ease of setting, possible lower rail) , and defining real load with shunting resistor after output cap

Pa did those things in Yore, when he was still messing with preamps (later he decided that younger one must deal with that preamp PITA, while he's dealing with kosher things :devilr: )

and, of course, those things were done from dawn of electronics
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user