Only if you think those reports are accurate...
I think there are a lot of credible witnesses to those high accelerations. So I believe it.
One of the most commonly researched areas is in hypothetically reducing a craft’s mass, preferably to zero, using electromagnetism.
Here's one theoretical study into altering inertial mass.
(PDF) Advances in the proposed electromagnetic zero-point field theory of inertia
Yes, this is an interesting one.
There are highly focused pulse lasers which can create 3D holograms in daylight.
They don't even require mist or fog.
They don't even require mist or fog.
Would you need a landbase platform to generate a 3D hologram? A lot of the Naval sightings happen over water in the middle of an ocean.
There are highly focused pulse lasers which can create 3D holograms in daylight.
They don't even require mist or fog.
It seems improbable anyone would create such a high tech expensive charade. It seems like something a conspiracy theorist might dream up.
Well, in the spirit of this thread, I would think that anything would at least be be possible! 😉
What makes you think the technology can't be installed aboard an ocean going vessel?Would you need a landbase platform to generate a 3D hologram? A lot of the Naval sightings happen over water in the middle of an ocean.
What makes you think the technology can't be installed aboard an ocean going vessel?
Of course it can be, but a lot of the Naval sightings happened in restricted area in which no unknown aircrafts or ocean vessels are allowed.
Sorry, what has to make sense?It has to make sense regardless which side you're on.
These links about laser holograms were posted in the other now closed "UFO" thread.
U.S. Navy Laser Creates Plasma ‘UFOs’
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1033176.pdf
Can this Navy patent explain away many UAP sightings? - Sandboxx
U.S. Navy Laser Creates Plasma ‘UFOs’
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1033176.pdf
Can this Navy patent explain away many UAP sightings? - Sandboxx
If you didn't know these were made by lasers, you would probably call them UFOs
Aerial Burton 3D display projects images into mid-air #DigInfo - YouTube
Aerial Burton 3D display projects images into mid-air #DigInfo - YouTube
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Yes, this is an interesting one.
No, it’s been debunked several times as flawed.
e.g. Yefim S. Levin, in Phys. Rev. A 79, 012114 – Published 27 January 2009
ABSTRACT
In the article by Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff (HRP) [Phys. Rev. A 49, 678 (1994)], an explanation of inertia as an “electromagnetic resistance arising from the known spectral distortion of the zero-point field in accelerated frames” is proposed. In this paper, we show that this result is an error due to incorrect physical and mathematical assumptions associated with taking a nonrelativistic approach.
I wonder how far Japanese firm Aerial Burton have advanced their pulsed laser technology?If you didn't know these were made by lasers, you would probably call them UFOs
Aerial Burton 3D display projects images into mid-air #DigInfo - YouTube
I haven't found any recent information on their progress.
The pulsed laser ionizes the molecules at specific spots in the air, which results in the flashes of light that make up each point in the aerial image.
I wonder if there is an article that debunks the debunkers? 😀No, it’s been debunked several times as flawed.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Not often, as soon as somebody does a better, more thorough or more accurate analysis the original proposal is dead in the water, you can’t really debunk better math, or analysis that is more complete because it removes simplifying assumptions and throws out conclusions that no longer work.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- US Naval pilots "We see UFO everyday for at least a couple of years"