Since NXP (and Nexperia) have discontinued manufacture of JFETS (EOL a couple of years ago), and in particular the BF862, what is the suggested low noise n-channel jfet? Well OK the LSK170 - but is there another tested alternative lurking?
Having asked the question I found BF862 is now End Of Life. Well that sucks. | Details | Hackaday.io so the demise has caused difficulties in the physics community. There is a suggestion in that link that the 2SK2394 is a viable alternative. It certainly has the same application area in am tuner and low noise applications. Has anyone looked at this device?
Craig
Having asked the question I found BF862 is now End Of Life. Well that sucks. | Details | Hackaday.io so the demise has caused difficulties in the physics community. There is a suggestion in that link that the 2SK2394 is a viable alternative. It certainly has the same application area in am tuner and low noise applications. Has anyone looked at this device?
Craig
Gerhard has done a good X-ref of the alternatives which can be found (I'll try and search if I get time).
At the time I didn't do the obvious and ask, but someone did about 6 months ago and was given 500 by a member.
At the time I didn't do the obvious and ask, but someone did about 6 months ago and was given 500 by a member.
What is the reason in the first place that all those Jfets are discontinued.
Is it because demand dried up ?
I still have a small pile of SK170 and SJ74 Fet’s that will probably never be used by me.
Hans
Is it because demand dried up ?
I still have a small pile of SK170 and SJ74 Fet’s that will probably never be used by me.
Hans
The demand for AM radios does not make a very exciting market - and this was the target application for the BF862.
Good question. Who can say Hans. But it cuts deep.
Renesas, which was what Hitachi semiconductors became, and which later acquired NEC, has obsoleted the vast majority of its extensive discrete semiconductor catalog. All JFETs and bipolars have gone, although they seem to be keeping MOSFET power devices going, presumably because of automotive applications.
On Semi, which acquired Fairchild and Sanyo have been working through a "rationalization" process that has seen the demise of many devices, among them the long time standard BC560 (although it lives on in SOT23 as the BC860). And daft things like continuing with a PNP but obsoleting the NPN, or complementary pairs the are now only available in different gain bands.
I note that Litteldiode has acquired IXYS fairly recently. Just a matter of time...
At least LIS is keeping the low noise JFET flame alive, including monolithic duals.
INTERFET too, but with punishing prices. The one detailed in HH, the IF3602 dual with stunning noise performance of measured 0.35nV/rootHz rising to a mere 0.6nV/rootHz at 10Hz, currently costs $100 each from Mouser. Idss is not well controlled, datasheet says 30-300mA. And of course the price to pay is very high capacitance.
Craig
Renesas, which was what Hitachi semiconductors became, and which later acquired NEC, has obsoleted the vast majority of its extensive discrete semiconductor catalog. All JFETs and bipolars have gone, although they seem to be keeping MOSFET power devices going, presumably because of automotive applications.
On Semi, which acquired Fairchild and Sanyo have been working through a "rationalization" process that has seen the demise of many devices, among them the long time standard BC560 (although it lives on in SOT23 as the BC860). And daft things like continuing with a PNP but obsoleting the NPN, or complementary pairs the are now only available in different gain bands.
I note that Litteldiode has acquired IXYS fairly recently. Just a matter of time...
At least LIS is keeping the low noise JFET flame alive, including monolithic duals.
INTERFET too, but with punishing prices. The one detailed in HH, the IF3602 dual with stunning noise performance of measured 0.35nV/rootHz rising to a mere 0.6nV/rootHz at 10Hz, currently costs $100 each from Mouser. Idss is not well controlled, datasheet says 30-300mA. And of course the price to pay is very high capacitance.
Craig
Last edited:
3R is 0,22nV/rtHz or -193dB.
Together with the 0.3nV/rtHz amp this gives -188dB, or 2dB more than the -190dB noise from the ZTX amp alone.
In that case the 1R cabling in series with the Cart can be almost completely ignored.
But the noise from the Cart alone is -194dB, so in combination with the 1R lead and the ZTX amp, you loose 6dB.
Depending on the output of the Cart, the question is whether a 0.3nV/rtHz ZTX amp is acceptable for this cart instead of worrying anout the 1R cabling.
Hans
Together with the 0.3nV/rtHz amp this gives -188dB, or 2dB more than the -190dB noise from the ZTX amp alone.
In that case the 1R cabling in series with the Cart can be almost completely ignored.
But the noise from the Cart alone is -194dB, so in combination with the 1R lead and the ZTX amp, you loose 6dB.
Depending on the output of the Cart, the question is whether a 0.3nV/rtHz ZTX amp is acceptable for this cart instead of worrying anout the 1R cabling.
Hans
I have an original Kondo Io from the late 70s!!! I used it with a Duncan head amp. Prior to that with a Tamura special order Tx loaned to me by Be Yamamura (RIP) who was a great friend. (Be gave me the cartridge which needs a new cantilever). I would like a simple head amp/riaa design!!!
3R is 0,22nV/rtHz or -193dB.
(...)
In that case the 1R cabling in series with the Cart can be almost completely ignored.
Rule of thumb: a series resistor 3 times smaller than the source resistance can be, noise wise, safely ignored.
brianco's Kondo Io has a coil resistance of 1 ohm - in which case the 1 ohm tone arm wire resistance degrades the source noise by 6dB.
However, with an output voltage of 0.12mV there is certainly a discussion to be had about the best method of amplifying such a small output from a 1 ohm source R.
There is no argument that as the cartridge R increases, the 1 ohm wiring resistance becomes rapidly less of an issue.
However, with an output voltage of 0.12mV there is certainly a discussion to be had about the best method of amplifying such a small output from a 1 ohm source R.
There is no argument that as the cartridge R increases, the 1 ohm wiring resistance becomes rapidly less of an issue.
I'm not sure if this has been pointed out already in the depths of this thread, but for low coil resistance MC cartridges such as many of the the 2 ohm Ortofon SPU's, the tonearm wiring can be a significant additional source of noise.
On the assumption that the internal wiring of a typical 9" arm is 0.4 metres (measured from an old set of SME wires), and using published data, the loop resistance is:
Old SME leads, measured 1.1 ohms
VDH MSS7, from spec 1.07 ohms
VDH MC300S silver, from spec 0.19 ohms
Cardas 34AWG, from spec 0.68 ohms
Cardas 33AWG, from spec 0.54 ohms
Audio Note silver, from spec 2.3 ohms
Connections, if clean, should add about 10 milliohms per connection, adding maybe a further 40 milliohms loop resistance which should be added to the above numbers.
So for anything other than the VDH pure silver single strand, which is seriously not cheap, it is prudent to add roughly an ohm for the arm wiring and connections. The only affordable (whatever the definition of that is) sub-ohm tone arm wire is the Cardas AWG33 at 0.54 ohms loop R.
Craig
If a connection only adds 10 mOhm, why not use a thicker wire inside the armtube and graft on a proper thin wire just before the exit?
Using Cardas 33 guage only adds about half an ohm loop resistance, so even with a 1 ohm cartridge only adds 1.75dB to the source noise.
There is a secondary effect. If such a 1 ohm cartridge is feeding a typical 10 ohm load, the half ohm lead resistance leads to a potential divider effect, reducing the signal voltage at the input by -0.4dB. Under those specific conditions the effective source noise is degraded by 1.75 + 0.4, or ~2.1dB
Whether that is worth a hill of beans in a practical context is debateable. However fakeall's concept of thicker wires in the arm tub transitioning to much thinner ones in the region of the arm pivot is not at all a bad idea, in the admittedly extreme example of a ~1 ohm cartridge.
There is a secondary effect. If such a 1 ohm cartridge is feeding a typical 10 ohm load, the half ohm lead resistance leads to a potential divider effect, reducing the signal voltage at the input by -0.4dB. Under those specific conditions the effective source noise is degraded by 1.75 + 0.4, or ~2.1dB
Whether that is worth a hill of beans in a practical context is debateable. However fakeall's concept of thicker wires in the arm tub transitioning to much thinner ones in the region of the arm pivot is not at all a bad idea, in the admittedly extreme example of a ~1 ohm cartridge.
Wow,But, as the standing joke goes 'I was attracted to vinyl because of the expense and inconvenience of it'
🙂
and all this time I thought it was because I didn't have any other choice.
But then as my wife and kid remind me, I'm the "OLDIE".
The good news is the people who know me don't tell me,
you have the cutest granddaughter. Then my wife tells them
that he's my father, don't let me kid you. -- Oh the joi.
Cheers,
Bonsai,
Did you move again? I thought you were in Asia.
Glad you appreciated the humor, as I did when I came
across your post. I laughed so much I had post my reply.
Cheers,
Did you move again? I thought you were in Asia.
Glad you appreciated the humor, as I did when I came
across your post. I laughed so much I had post my reply.
Cheers,
😀
Yes - in the UK now but who knows what the future holds. Came back at the end of 2015 after nearly 10 yrs out there. Still miss it I have to say!
Yes - in the UK now but who knows what the future holds. Came back at the end of 2015 after nearly 10 yrs out there. Still miss it I have to say!
- Home
- Source & Line
- Analogue Source
- Richard Lee's Ultra low Noise MC Head Amp