AES: Evaluating Electrolytic Capacitors Specified for Audio Use

What is the right result?
I am talking from point of view 'how to find a difference'.
I believe caps are more different than it was seen in the article.
But if he intentionally have chosen this setup with usual for studios opamps (some 'standart setup') - then ok. Then we clearly see that there is almost not difference between different el. caps.
So he proves that el. caps are almost the same in some conditions (large enough capacity). He is of cause not wrong here. It is a right result.
 
Last edited:
Even if 50 million people believe a stupid thing, it still is a stupid thing ;-)

It is normal for all humans to believe some stupid things. They are less likely to do it in their field of expertise (if they have one), but they still do it in other areas.

It is also normal for humans to be far, far better at seeing other people's faults than at seeing their own faults. Humans are virtually blind to the latter. So, complain about others if you want, but probably wise not to feel to smug that you are better. That goes for all humans.
 
It is normal for all humans to believe some stupid things. They are less likely to do it in their field of expertise (if they have one), but they still do it in other areas.

It is also normal for humans to be far, far better at seeing other people's faults than at seeing their own faults. Humans are virtually blind to the latter. So, complain about others if you want, but probably wise not to feel to smug that you are better. That goes for all humans.

+100
 
The large values are clipping distortion from the op-amps, as mentioned in the article. For some reason it is somewhat worse with capacitors, presumably because high-pass filter overshoots make some op-amps clip a bit harder.

That made sense until revisiting figure 6, which shows no evidence of overload at any frequency at +20 dBu. Something about the test protocol?
 
What?? ..... How about run-in?? After 100hrs of run-in, any changes?? ...... Nothing.....
I see you are a firm Believer from the Church of Run In / Burn In 🙂

And then, no citations, no references nothing......You call this paper???
Maybe 6 Moons or some other Audiophile Approved site cares to publish these results.
Not holding my breath though, they lack the required subjective hyperbolic poetic effusion needed. 🙄
 
Read this and you will be astounded....
 

Attachments

  • 4960D60F-0516-41A9-9241-1AC566666068.png
    4960D60F-0516-41A9-9241-1AC566666068.png
    369.3 KB · Views: 150