Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)

Haven't you considered sharing the existing results?
I am planning to share, but I have thought I should not bore the forum with all the failed attempts.

I can show some measurements of the current model when I'm back at the computer in the beginning of next week.

I have worked with the throat overhanging the surround somewhat, so it's very cool if you would include this possibility in your tool.
 
In fact, almost anything axisymmetric is possible with the new scripting add-on (the waveguide doesn't have to be axisymmetric, only the throat does) -
Even phase plugs for compression drivers but it would probably be too tedious doing it this way. Definitely possible.
 

Attachments

  • script-plug2.PNG
    script-plug2.PNG
    63 KB · Views: 472
  • script-plug22.PNG
    script-plug22.PNG
    249.7 KB · Views: 433
  • script-plug23.PNG
    script-plug23.PNG
    68.4 KB · Views: 453
Last edited:
I am planning to share, but I have thought I should not bore the forum with all the failed attempts.

I can show some measurements of the current model when I'm back at the computer in the beginning of next week.

I have worked with the throat overhanging the surround somewhat, so it's very cool if you would include this possibility in your tool.

My entire post history is full of failure, people seem to enjoy it 🙂
 
Just a try - 1.4" throat, free standing, only ⌀280 mm:
(It's still more on the "spiral" side, I'd prefer it more on the "beamwidth control" side. Now it's possible to freely mix the two.)

Interesting to see improved 'loading', detriment of some beaming.
 

Attachments

  • spiral-mesh.PNG
    spiral-mesh.PNG
    136.7 KB · Views: 376
  • spiral-polars.png
    spiral-polars.png
    17.4 KB · Views: 163
  • spiral-pmap.png
    spiral-pmap.png
    24.3 KB · Views: 165
  • spiral-imp.png
    spiral-imp.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 152
Last edited:
I was playing a bit with the Bliesma waveguide but so far nothing I would really like. Anyway, this is the tweeter simluated alone in a infinite baffle (just the diaphragm with surround) compared to the measured data from HiFiCompass (.com). The radiation impedance included, to put things into perspective -
 

Attachments

  • bliesma_imp.png
    bliesma_imp.png
    18.4 KB · Views: 491
  • T34.png
    T34.png
    117.6 KB · Views: 514
The point WG0 is pre-defined automatically at [0, d/2], where d is the throat diameter of the horn (=Throat.Diameter). This is about the only way to ensure the mesh is cohesive. So the line p5 - WG0 is simply a line between the point p5 and this point.

The parameter zoff is used when the origin for z axis in the drawing is not where the horn starts, like in the example. They need to match (horn starts always at z=0, this is the plane of the throat).

I will start a thread dedicated to version 4.6 in the "Software Tools" section and leave this thread for a more general discussion. I'm still not finished with the documentation (a lot of new things)...
 
I was playing a bit with the Bliesma waveguide but so far nothing I would really like. Anyway, this is the tweeter simluated alone in a infinite baffle (just the diaphragm with surround) compared to the measured data from HiFiCompass (.com). The radiation impedance included, to put things into perspective -

That's look pretty great 🙂

Sorry if I've missed it in the thread (or manual), but is there somewhere you've written instructions or explained the parameters for how to model a dome?
 
I'm really not able to say.

- Now when I think about it, by means of this new source definition feature it will be possible to simulate just any horn profile you can imagine, as long as it is axisymmetric - simply define it as the part of the source (from line segments) and add nothing more. Probably a profile import function would make more sense for that, it would allow for the other non axisymmetric features (like morphing to rectangle), this is just a by-product.
 
Last edited:
I was playing a bit with the Bliesma waveguide but so far nothing I would really like. Anyway, this is the tweeter simluated alone in a infinite baffle (just the diaphragm with surround) compared to the measured data from HiFiCompass (.com). The radiation impedance included, to put things into perspective -

Whether a tweeter works with a waveguide largely depends on the size, shape and the material of the dome and the surround.
Ring radiators usually work well, as do flattened/segmental domes. Hemispherical domes are generally less suited as the radiation pattern seems to interfere with the waveguide, especially if it's deep.

The large dome of the T-34A appears to be (almost) hemispherical and therefore may not be the ideal candidate for waveguide loading.
 

Attachments

  • bliesma-t34a-4-aluminium-magnesium-dome-tweeter-ma.jpg
    bliesma-t34a-4-aluminium-magnesium-dome-tweeter-ma.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 124
Last edited: