New Markaudio Drivers

How do you mean “go with”? From my experience the sonic signatures of the several driver models you mentioned are different enough that they’d be distinguishable from each other in terms of timbre matching or dynamics & soundstage presentation. For example, I’d certainly endeavour to use the same model across the front row of a multi-channel home theatre set-up, although circumstances often preclude using identical enclosures there - or certainly always have for me.

by “go with” i meant, would the a7ms driver fit in the slim classic gr dMar-Ken7.3 plans? basically, looking for a slim design for the alpair 7 ms driver.
planet10 said:
There is a. specific one coming.

dave

probably should place the order already.

also, i'm in between the a7ms, a10.3m (friend's recommendation), and the a11ms. looking for a daily driver for a not too loud close listening sessions that also work as studio monitors, any recommendations?
 
Last edited:
by “go with” i meant, would the a7ms driver fit in the slim classic gr dMar-Ken7.3 plans?

While i suspect the same size box works, the tuning would need changing. But while with size is optimim for an A7.3 Mar-Ken, the appropriate size for the A7ms is closer to that of the EL70 (ie 13l vrs 9l).

Keep poking me guys, i have been lax getting myA7/11ms boxes out. A CGR will be a free plan, the more elaborate ones will fall into their own plan-sets.

also, i'm in between the a7ms, a10.3m, and the a11ms. looking for a daily driver for a not too loud close listening sessions that also work as studio monitors, any recommendations?

Of these the A99ms drivers are not near as well known as the A10.3. For near field use the smaller driver will be better. The A7s (include A7.3/p7HD) will likely reach lower than the A11ms.

dave
 
For nearfield the 7cm/70mm class are probably the Goldilocks size in the MA line-up. At approx $35USD lower cost than the A7.3, I’d be inclined to recommend the Pluvia 7 metal. I’ve not heard the paper version, but found the A7P that preceded to be not quite to my liking.
Now, if you can afford the slightly larger enclosure size they’d require, the 10cm class - A10M or P, or CHN110 would also be worth considering. I’ve been living with a trio of A10M as front row in my 7.1 HT for several years now, and with the bass management now available in AVRs they perform very well indeed, and I’ve not yet felt the need to upgrade.
 
I'm looking at the Alpair 5.3 for a small set of studio monitors. How can I calculate the optimal enclosure volume? Sealed or Ported?

Vented. 2-2.5 litres vented. I should have a plan for these posted — my 2 litre plan (the free one). More elaborate (same tuning and alignment, bigger boxes, including µMar-Kens with the vents down the side).

uMar-Ken52.jpg


If you want the most bass, the Frugel-Horn Lite, or possibly the not yet released Woden Festival ML-V. There is also Girrafe.

Worth noting that A5.2/3 CHN-50 all fit into the same boxes.

dave
 
I built a pair of Giraffe when we first got our hands on the A5.2 - a couple of years ago now. They worked well enough for their very small footprint, but as I’ve found with all 3 sizes of the FH family, the latter definitely delivers more low end than you’d think the driver should be capable of when compared to either MLTL/Pensil, or “standard” vented bookshelf/ monitor sized vented enclosures for the same driver.
That said, at the price of much greater build complexity and height requirements, the Olson / Nagaoka style manifolds take it a step further.
 
Thanks. The smallest designs you have are
mMar-Ken6 for Alpair 6 (milliSize)
mMarS for CHR-70 (milliSize/sealed 5.5 litre)
mMars for Alpair 7 (milliSize/sealed 5.5 litre)
is that correct?

Do you wire these directly to the amp? No passive BSC. Any high pass on the amp side?